Report an error
Solar power generated in Bangladesh correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Associates degrees awarded in Psychology | r=1 | 11yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Beau | r=1 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| CGI Inc.'s stock price (GIB) | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| AutoZone's stock price (AZO) | r=0.99 | 20yrs | No |
| Union Pacific's stock price (UNP) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Starbucks' stock price (SBUX) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Blair | r=0.97 | 25yrs | No |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals' stock price (VRTX) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of social workers in California | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| Butter consumption | r=0.94 | 25yrs | Yes! |
| AstraZeneca's stock price (AZN) | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
| Points allowed by the New York Jets | r=0.81 | 25yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Bangladesh also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)