Report an error
Electricity generation in Netherlands correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
| The number of event planners in Colorado | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Lukas | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Julian | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.97 | 34yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.96 | 33yrs | No |
| Inflation in the US | r=0.95 | 30yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.93 | 32yrs | No |
| Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.93 | 32yrs | No |
| The number of tire repairers and changers in Utah | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
| Budget for largest movie production | r=0.9 | 42yrs | No |
| Votes for Republican Senators in Tennessee | r=0.7 | 14yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Netherlands also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
