Report an error
Nuclear power generation in Romania correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The number of actuaries in New York | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Romeo | r=0.95 | 26yrs | Yes! |
| Total number of live births in Australia | r=0.95 | 26yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Parker | r=0.94 | 26yrs | Yes! |
| US household spending on pets, toys, and hobbies | r=0.91 | 22yrs | No |
| The number of zoologists in Arizona | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.91 | 26yrs | Yes! |
| The number of cooks, institution and cafeteria in Minnesota | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
| The number of urban planners in California | r=0.87 | 19yrs | No |
| Cristiano Ronaldo's domestic league goal tally | r=0.8 | 18yrs | No |
| The number of cardiovascular technicians in Ohio | r=0.72 | 19yrs | No |
| The number of anesthesiologists in California | r=0.65 | 19yrs | No |
Nuclear power generation in Romania also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
