Report an error
Popularity of the first name Rafael correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Turkiye | r=0.99 | 8yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Laos | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Total likes of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Bank of America's stock price (BAC) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Dollar General's stock price (DG) | r=0.85 | 13yrs | No |
The number of elementary school teachers in Oregon | r=0.75 | 20yrs | No |
The number of fast food cooks in Texas | r=-0.83 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rafael also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)