Report an error
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Australia correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in literature | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| US production of fluid beverage milk | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Alexander | r=0.94 | 43yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Alexandre | r=0.92 | 43yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to do magic' | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in Visual and performing arts | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of tailors, dressmakers, and custom sewers in Alabama | r=0.87 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Hanna | r=0.83 | 43yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Australia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
