Report an error
Popularity of the first name Abraham correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.98 | 39yrs | No | 
| Geothermal power generated in Italy | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No | 
| Nuclear power generation in South Korea | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No | 
| Electricity generation in Germany | r=0.95 | 31yrs | No | 
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.93 | 43yrs | No | 
| Anheuser-Busch InBev's stock price (BUD) | r=0.93 | 13yrs | No | 
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.92 | 44yrs | No | 
| UFO sightings in California | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No | 
| UFO sightings in Arizona | r=0.89 | 47yrs | No | 
| The number of database administrators in Florida | r=0.87 | 18yrs | No | 
| New York Times Fiction Best Sellers | r=0.84 | 40yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.63 | 43yrs | No | 
Popularity of the first name Abraham also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
