Report an error
Popularity of the first name Israel correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Electricity generation in Italy | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No | 
| Gasoline pumped in United States | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No | 
| Electricity generation in South Africa | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No | 
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.95 | 39yrs | No | 
| Number of highschoolers in the US | r=0.93 | 33yrs | No | 
| USA Population | r=0.92 | 48yrs | No | 
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.9 | 43yrs | No | 
| Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Tetris | r=0.88 | 22yrs | No | 
| Number of Grand Slam Finals played by Roger Federer | r=0.86 | 13yrs | Yes! | 
| Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Dwayne Johnson | r=0.85 | 21yrs | No | 
Popularity of the first name Israel also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
