Report an error
Popularity of the first name Marina correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'black holes' | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
The number of accountants and auditors in Connecticut | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Germany | r=0.92 | 32yrs | No |
Carjackings in the US | r=0.92 | 27yrs | No |
Google searches for 'snoop dog' | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.88 | 19yrs | No |
Violent crime rates | r=0.67 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Marina also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)