Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.
Report an error
Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of office clerks in Kentucky | r=0.97 | 17yrs | Yes! |
The number of statisticians in New Jersey | r=0.96 | 17yrs | Yes! |
The number of production, planning, and expediting clerks in Ohio | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Minnesota | r=0.95 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Hydopower energy generated in Turkmenistan | r=0.94 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Chad | r=0.94 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Average SAT score in math | r=0.93 | 17yrs | No |
Total likes of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
The number of radiation therapists in Texas | r=0.92 | 17yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on laundry and cleaning supplies | r=0.9 | 17yrs | No |
Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.88 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'flights to Antarctica' | r=0.86 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for '3Blue1Brown' | r=0.81 | 17yrs | No |
Rain in Jacksonville | r=0.66 | 14yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'distracted boyfriend' meme also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)