Report an error
Popularity of the first name Zane correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.99 | 39yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in New Zealand | r=0.97 | 43yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in United States | r=0.97 | 43yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 5th grade | r=0.95 | 33yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Netherlands | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
The number of adhesive bonding machine operators in Illinois | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.91 | 44yrs | No |
Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States | r=0.87 | 32yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.64 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Zane also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)