Report an error
Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of set and exhibit designers in New York | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Thailand | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'unicorns' | r=0.94 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Eve | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Jupiter | r=0.92 | 15yrs | No |
Food spending in Arkansas | r=0.88 | 12yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Latvia | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" | r=0.86 | 11yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Earth | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No |
US kids in public school | r=0.82 | 14yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Venus | r=0.76 | 15yrs | No |
The number of electrical engineers in Florida | r=-0.92 | 14yrs | No |
Average number of comments on The Game Theorists YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)