Report an error
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Virginia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of movies Joan Crawford appeared in | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags | r=0.99 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Gasoline pumped in Mozambique | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Nigeria | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Mozambique | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Pearl | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in New Caledonia | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Zambia | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
US Shoe Store Sales | r=0.89 | 8yrs | No |
Number of websites on the internet | r=0.88 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Cameron Diaz appeared in | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
Number of firearms manufactured in the US | r=0.87 | 9yrs | No |
Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position | r=0.85 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls issued by Chrysler | r=0.81 | 11yrs | No |
The number of movies Emma Thompson appeared in | r=0.78 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Viola Davis appeared in | r=0.75 | 6yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Virginia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)