Report an error
Popularity of the first name Aaliyah correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Petroluem consumption in Saint Kitts and Nevis | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in literature | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Nuclear power generation in Brazil | r=0.96 | 40yrs | No |
| Liquefied petroleum gas used in Egypt | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in California | r=0.94 | 46yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'facebook' | r=0.93 | 17yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.93 | 44yrs | No |
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.92 | 38yrs | No |
| US kids in public school | r=0.91 | 33yrs | No |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.9 | 32yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Colorado | r=0.88 | 46yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'bazinga' meme | r=0.83 | 17yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Taylor Swift' | r=0.74 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Aaliyah also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)