Report an error
Patents granted to Texas Instruments correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Hydopower energy generated in Guinea | r=0.93 | 11yrs | No |
The number of postal service clerks in Puerto Rico | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
The number of postal service clerks in Florida | r=0.89 | 12yrs | No |
The number of computer hardware engineers in Florida | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
Academy Award Best Actor Winner's Age | r=0.85 | 12yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with United Airlines | r=0.82 | 11yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on other household products | r=0.79 | 12yrs | No |
Wins for the Pittsburgh Pirates | r=-0.91 | 12yrs | No |
Patents granted to Texas Instruments also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)