Report an error
Total value of all $50 bills printed correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Albemarle's stock price (ALB) | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
| NVIDIA's stock price (NVDA) | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
| Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
| Powerball lottery numbers | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Georgina | r=0.93 | 12yrs | No |
| Advanced Micro Devices' stock price (AMD) | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
| Annual U.S. inflation rate | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
| Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Zeus | r=0.91 | 12yrs | No |
| Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'housing prices' | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on fresh milk and cream | r=0.83 | 12yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'dr pepper vs mr pibb' | r=0.77 | 12yrs | No |
| NCAA Women's Softball Championship (Div I) Final Score Difference Between Winners and Runner-Up | r=0.75 | 12yrs | No |
| xkcd comics published about math | r=0.69 | 12yrs | No |
Total value of all $50 bills printed also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)