Report an error
Popularity of the first name Gianna correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Oman | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
US dairy skim solids used to produce cream products | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
Air pollution in Jackson, Wyoming | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'i am once again' meme | r=0.97 | 17yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Dominica | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Jersey | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Total length of MinuteEarth YouTube videos | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
The average number of likes on LockPickingLawyer YouTube videos | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Honduras | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Google searches for 'takeout near me' | r=0.9 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'wojak' meme | r=0.9 | 17yrs | No |
Fair Isaac's stock price (FICO) | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gianna also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)