Report an error
Movie ticket sales in the U.S. and Canada by year correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Votes for Libertarian Senators in Minnesota | r=0.96 | 7yrs | No | 
| The number of first-line retail sales supervisors in New Mexico | r=0.92 | 13yrs | Yes! | 
| The number of school teachers in Kentucky | r=0.9 | 13yrs | No | 
| Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.81 | 34yrs | Yes! | 
| The divorce rate in Massachusetts | r=0.8 | 23yrs | No | 
| Total annual cinema attendance in the UK | r=0.79 | 22yrs | No | 
| The marriage rate in California | r=0.78 | 23yrs | No | 
| Academy Awards Ceremony Audience Size | r=0.77 | 23yrs | No | 
| The wind speed in Dallas | r=0.73 | 24yrs | No | 
| Runs scored by the Baltimore Orioles | r=0.48 | 43yrs | No | 
Movie ticket sales in the U.S. and Canada by year also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
