Report an error
Popularity of the first name Dane correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Britney Spears' | r=0.93 | 15yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
BP's stock price (BP) | r=0.85 | 21yrs | No |
Season wins for the New York Giants | r=0.58 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Dane also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)