Report an error
Popularity of the first name Edith correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Delta Airlines' stock price (DAL) | r=0.96 | 15yrs | Yes! |
| The number of microbiologists in Maryland | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'spurious correlations' | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
| Biogen's stock price (BIIB) | r=0.89 | 21yrs | No |
| The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.87 | 21yrs | No |
| Revenue of US Broadcasting Industry | r=0.87 | 17yrs | No |
| US consumption of imported cheese that did not come from cows | r=0.72 | 27yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'who is donald trump' | r=0.71 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Edith also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
