Report an error
Annual count of part-time employees in the United States correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Petroluem consumption in Australia | r=0.96 | 33yrs | No |
| Petroluem consumption in Kuwait | r=0.96 | 32yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Branson | r=0.96 | 33yrs | No |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.94 | 32yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Sophia | r=0.91 | 33yrs | No |
| Number of Lawyers in the United States | r=0.91 | 33yrs | No |
| Number of public school students in Kindergarten | r=0.91 | 33yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Aubrey | r=0.89 | 33yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Dental assisting | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
| Number of public school students in 3rd grade | r=0.83 | 33yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Kansas | r=0.81 | 32yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'batman' | r=0.7 | 19yrs | No |
| The number of movies Gemma Arterton appeared in | r=0.6 | 21yrs | No |
| Arson in Oregon | r=-0.93 | 33yrs | No |
Annual count of part-time employees in the United States also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
