Report an error
Popularity of the first name Helena correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Electricity generation in Barbados | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No | 
| Mozzarella cheese consumption | r=0.92 | 27yrs | No | 
| UFO sightings in New Mexico | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No | 
| Natural cheese consumption | r=0.9 | 27yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Florence Pugh appeared in | r=0.87 | 8yrs | No | 
| Average SAT score in math | r=0.82 | 33yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.63 | 43yrs | No | 
Popularity of the first name Helena also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
