Report an error
Popularity of the first name Katlin correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the 'weird flex but ok' meme | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Germany | r=0.95 | 25yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on books | r=0.93 | 16yrs | No |
| The marriage rate in Colorado | r=0.92 | 17yrs | No |
| Motor vehicle thefts in Pennsylvania | r=0.92 | 31yrs | No |
| Arson in Pennsylvania | r=0.92 | 31yrs | No |
| Violent crime rates | r=0.9 | 31yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'slaps roof of car' meme | r=0.9 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon | r=0.88 | 29yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'expanding brain' meme | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
| The number of vending machine repairers in New Hampshire | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
| How fun Vihart's YouTube video titles are | r=0.84 | 7yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Katlin also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)