Report an error
Popularity of the first name Reese correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in Education | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.98 | 37yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.94 | 44yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Texas | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
Annual Email Spam Rates | r=0.92 | 22yrs | No |
The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Nevada | r=0.91 | 19yrs | Yes! |
US music album sales | r=0.88 | 16yrs | No |
US kids in public school | r=0.87 | 33yrs | No |
The number of university biological science teachers in Alabama | r=0.71 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Reese also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)