Report an error
Popularity of the first name Cruz correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.97 | 32yrs | No |
| The number of statisticians in New York | r=0.96 | 20yrs | No |
| Total number of live births in Australia | r=0.95 | 48yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Connecticut | r=0.94 | 47yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Transportation | r=0.93 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.92 | 44yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Nursing | r=0.92 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.92 | 43yrs | No |
| Budget for largest movie production | r=0.87 | 47yrs | No |
| The number of statisticians in Alabama | r=0.84 | 20yrs | Yes! |
| The number of movies Helena Bonham Carter appeared in | r=0.56 | 40yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Cruz also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
