Report an error
Popularity of the first name Elsa correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
Global sales revenue of elevators and escalators | r=0.96 | 7yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Malaysia Airlines' | r=0.95 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Biomass power generated in Sierra Leone | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
UFO sightings in South Carolina | r=0.91 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Louisiana | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Total Number of Successful Mount Everest Climbs | r=0.9 | 37yrs | No |
Air pollution in Eureka, California | r=0.86 | 34yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Oklahoma | r=0.85 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Jet fuel used in Maldives | r=0.84 | 42yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.79 | 19yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.6 | 44yrs | No |
Automotive recalls issued by Nissan North America | r=0.59 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Elsa also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)