Report an error
UK Service Retail Price Index correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Number of internet users | r=1 | 17yrs | No |
| Super Bowl TV viewership | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Rex | r=0.94 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.94 | 15yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ali | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Chanel | r=0.9 | 19yrs | No |
| Annual comic book sales in North America | r=0.9 | 16yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'batman' | r=0.83 | 15yrs | No |
| Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.81 | 19yrs | No |
| The number of sound engineering technicians in New Jersey | r=0.8 | 16yrs | No |
| How clickbait-y Numberphile YouTube video titles are | r=0.72 | 8yrs | No |
UK Service Retail Price Index also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
