Report an error
Popularity of the first name Kristofer correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Arson in United States | r=0.98 | 38yrs | No | 
| Arson in Texas | r=0.97 | 38yrs | No | 
| The marriage rate in Wyoming | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No | 
| The divorce rate in Tennessee | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No | 
| The marriage rate in Tennessee | r=0.94 | 23yrs | No | 
| Pirate attacks globally | r=0.93 | 14yrs | No | 
Popularity of the first name Kristofer also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
