Report an error
Popularity of the first name Maverick correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Philosophy and religious studies | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in United States | r=0.99 | 38yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Burundi | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Luxembourg | r=0.98 | 25yrs | Yes! |
Lockheed Martin's stock price (LMT) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Belize | r=0.94 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'we live in a society' meme | r=0.82 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Maverick also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)