Report an error
Internet Access Rate among US Citizens correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Biomass power generated in Angola | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
| Solar power generated in Honduras | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Oklahoma | r=0.97 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| The number of market research analysts in California | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
| Votes for Libertarian Senators in Iowa | r=0.92 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'restaurant near me' | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies | r=0.9 | 11yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Iran | r=0.87 | 22yrs | No |
| Number of public school students in 10th grade | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
| The number of school teachers in Massachusetts | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
Internet Access Rate among US Citizens also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
