Report an error
Popularity of the first name Meranda correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Visitors to SeaWorld Florida | r=0.96 | 7yrs | No | 
| Annual US household spending on books | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Timothee Chalamet appeared in | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'where do birds go when it rains' | r=0.79 | 10yrs | No | 
| Air quality in Oklahoma City | r=0.66 | 34yrs | No | 
| Automotive recalls issued by General Motors | r=0.58 | 39yrs | Yes! | 
| Public school high school enrollments in the United States | r=-0.69 | 39yrs | No | 
Popularity of the first name Meranda also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
