Report an error
Popularity of the first name Maeve correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Adobe's stock price (ADBE) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.99 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Amazon.com's stock price (AMZN) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
Abbott Laboratories' stock price (ABT) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Hungary | r=0.99 | 14yrs | Yes! |
NIKE, Inc.'s stock price (NKE) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
Costco Wholesale's stock price (COST) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
S&P Global's stock price (SPGI) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company's stock price (TSM) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Apple's stock price (AAPL) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Lululemon's stock price (LULU) | r=0.98 | 15yrs | No |
DexCom's stock price (DXCM) | r=0.98 | 17yrs | No |
Microsoft's stock price (MSFT) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Autodesk's stock price (ADSK) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Accenture's stock price (ACN) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
Nasdaq's stock price (NDAQ) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Maeve also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)