Report an error
Wins for the Colorado Rockies correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| How professional-sounding Technology Connections YouTube video titles are | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
| Total Runs Scored by Chicago Cubs Team in National League (Central and East Division) | r=0.75 | 30yrs | No |
| Miss World's Age | r=0.7 | 30yrs | No |
| The number of movies Jonah Hill appeared in | r=0.6 | 20yrs | No |
| How provocative LEMMiNO YouTube video titles are | r=0.59 | 12yrs | No |
| The number of retail salespersons in Colorado | r=0.56 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' | r=-0.78 | 20yrs | No |
Wins for the Colorado Rockies also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
