Report an error
Ticket sales for Los Angeles Angels games correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| xkcd comics published about romance | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No | 
| Number of registered Yamaha motorcycles in the UK | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 't-rex' | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No | 
| Electricity generation in Czechia | r=0.91 | 27yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Kate | r=0.77 | 45yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Diego | r=0.7 | 45yrs | No | 
| Popularity of the first name Mariana | r=0.7 | 45yrs | No | 
Ticket sales for Los Angeles Angels games also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
