Report an error
United States' Fruit Juice Export Volume correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in literature | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Macie | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
| Number of viewers of Victoria's Secret Fashion Show | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sophia | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
| Kerosene used in Turkiye | r=0.94 | 13yrs | No |
| The number of college psychology teachers in Florida | r=0.93 | 13yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Gabriella | r=0.9 | 13yrs | No |
| The number of vending machine repairers in Pennsylvania | r=0.88 | 13yrs | No |
| The number of judges in Oregon | r=0.87 | 13yrs | No |
| Chicago Bulls Win Percentage Progression | r=0.86 | 13yrs | No |
United States' Fruit Juice Export Volume also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)