Report an error
The number of mathematicians in California correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Michael Schumacher's Formula One Ranking | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
| How insightful LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Kahn Academy' | r=0.86 | 16yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ahmed | r=0.86 | 20yrs | No |
| Gasoline pumped in Chad | r=0.81 | 19yrs | No |
| Popularity of the 'not sure if' meme | r=0.8 | 17yrs | No |
| Super Bowl TV viewership | r=0.78 | 20yrs | No |
| Customer satisfaction with Dillard's | r=0.72 | 18yrs | No |
The number of mathematicians in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
