Report an error
US dairy skim solids used to produce cream products correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Budget for largest movie production | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Gianna | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Yaritza | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Elyse | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Zambia | r=0.96 | 7yrs | No |
Public school high school enrollments in the United States | r=0.96 | 7yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ella | r=0.96 | 7yrs | No |
Frank Lampard's appearances for the England national team | r=0.95 | 7yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Texas | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Natalie Portman appeared in | r=0.89 | 7yrs | No |
US dairy skim solids used to produce cream products also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)