Report an error
The number of psychiatrists in Florida correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Verisk Analytics' stock price (VRSK) | r=0.99 | 13yrs | No |
Autodesk's stock price (ADSK) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Netflix's stock price (NFLX) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Google searches for 'elon musk' | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Apple's stock price (AAPL) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
Google's Net Income | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'wojak' meme | r=0.96 | 17yrs | No |
US household spending on home maintenance | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
The number of psychiatrists in Florida also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)