Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Popularity of the first name Cinthia | r=0.97 | 23yrs | No | 
| Kerosene used in Malawi | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No | 
| Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No | 
| US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.94 | 20yrs | Yes! | 
| Popularity of the 'gangnam style' meme | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No | 
| Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' | r=0.93 | 20yrs | Yes! | 
| Arson in Minnesota | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No | 
GMO use in corn grown in Minnesota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
