Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Ohio | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Education | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'call of duty' | r=0.85 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Semaj | r=0.85 | 23yrs | Yes! |
The number of parking enforcement workers in Ohio | r=0.82 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of geoscientists in Ohio | r=0.81 | 20yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Djibouti | r=0.79 | 22yrs | No |
Asthma prevalence in American children | r=0.77 | 17yrs | No |
Unemployment Rate in the United States | r=0.68 | 23yrs | No |
Freeport-McMoRan's stock price (FCX) | r=0.51 | 22yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)