about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,550 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the second variable is Viewership count for Days of Our Lives.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The shortage led to a lack of food-related subplots and characters, making the show less engaging for food enthusiasts.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. In a bustling kitchen scene, depict dietetic technicians preparing a variety of tasty treats and snacks, with their arms moving swiftly to create an assortment of munchies. On a nearby TV screen, show the dramatic soap opera "Days of Our Lives" playing, with viewers indulging in the delicious snacks. As the dietetic technicians gradually disappear, depict the kitchen becoming empty, and the TV screen showing a dwindling viewership count, symbolizing the decline in interest in the soap opera without the tempting treats. Ensure the visual depiction is simple, without any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Psychedelic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Voxel art Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives, in the following situation: As dietetic technicians disappeared, so did the tempting treats and snacks they prepared. With fewer delicious snacks available, viewers lost interest in stress-eating while watching dramatic soap operas like Days of Our Lives. As a result, the viewership count decreased as North Carolinians realized they couldn't fully enjoy the show without their assortment of munchies. It seems that without the culinary creations of the dietetic technicians, the drama just wasn't as sweet for the fans of the show.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a kitchen, the bustling dietetic technicians are seen preparing a variety of tasty treats and snacks, their arms moving swiftly to create an assortment of munchies. On the nearby TV screen, the dramatic soap opera "Days of Our Lives" is playing, with viewers indulging in the delicious snacks. However, as the dietetic technicians gradually disappear, the kitchen becomes empty, and the TV screen shows a dwindling viewership count, symbolizing the decline in interest in the soap opera without the tempting treats.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a kitchen, the bustling dietetic technicians are seen preparing a variety of tasty treats and snacks, their arms moving swiftly to create an assortment of munchies. On the nearby TV screen, the dramatic soap opera "Days of Our Lives" is playing, with viewers indulging in the delicious snacks. However, as the dietetic technicians gradually disappear, the kitchen becomes empty, and the TV screen shows a dwindling viewership count, symbolizing the decline in interest in the soap opera without the tempting treats. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. In a bustling kitchen scene, depict dietetic technicians preparing a variety of tasty treats and snacks, with their arms moving swiftly to create an assortment of munchies. On a nearby TV screen, show the dramatic soap opera "Days of Our Lives" playing, with viewers indulging in the delicious snacks. As the dietetic technicians gradually disappear, depict the kitchen becoming empty, and the TV screen showing a dwindling viewership count, symbolizing the decline in interest in the soap opera without the tempting treats. Ensure the visual depiction is simple, without any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina caused Viewership count for Days of Our Lives to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina

Journal of Culinary Communications and Cultural Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected yet fascinating association between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera, Days of Our Lives. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, a thorough analysis was conducted for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 elucidates a striking positive relationship, with p < 0.01, presenting a compelling argument for the entwined nature of dietary expertise and daytime drama. The implications of this correlation are discussed, shedding light on the potential implications for both the healthcare profession and the television industry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected yet fascinating association between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera, Days of Our Lives. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, a thorough analysis was conducted for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 elucidates a striking positive relationship, with p < 0.01, presenting a compelling argument for the entwined nature of dietary expertise and daytime drama. The implications of this correlation are discussed, shedding light on the potential implications for both the healthcare profession and the television industry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of dietetic technicians and daytime television may seem like quite the odd couple at first glance. One wonders what connection, if any, could exist between individuals dedicated to fostering healthy eating habits and a beloved afternoon soap opera that has thrived for decades. However, in the realm of statistical analysis, one often encounters unexpected pairings that spark curiosity and warrant further investigation.

This paper serves to unravel the intertwined relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the enduring viewership count for Days of Our Lives. While on the surface, these entities may appear as disparate as oil and water, a deeper scrutiny of the data reveals a rather surprising correlation that begs for elucidation.

Beginning with the assumption that statistical analysis is much like peeling an onion, one layer at a time, we delve into the historical context and the evolution of these seemingly distinct realms. At the intersection of nutrition education and daytime drama, we venture into uncharted territory, where numbers and narratives converge in an unexpectedly cohesive manner.

Lurking behind the scenes of this peculiar correlation is the potential for humor and irony, much like the plot twists and character drama of the soap opera itself. Though our study maintains a steadfast commitment to empirical rigor, one cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research topic. After all, who could have predicted that dietary expertise and television entertainment could be so tightly entwined?

Join us as we embark on this soapy affair of statistical inquiry, where the numbers on dietetic technicians and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives reveal themselves to be more than just figures on a spreadsheet. With a hint of skepticism and a dash of curiosity, let us uncover the mysteries that lie at the crossroads of public health and popular culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected yet fascinating association between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera, Days of Our Lives. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, a thorough analysis was conducted for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 elucidates a striking positive relationship, with p < 0.01, presenting a compelling argument for the entwined nature of dietary expertise and daytime drama. The implications of this correlation are discussed, shedding light on the potential implications for both the healthcare profession and the television industry.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of dietetic technicians and daytime television may seem like quite the odd couple at first glance. One wonders what connection, if any, could exist between individuals dedicated to fostering healthy eating habits and a beloved afternoon soap opera that has thrived for decades. However, in the realm of statistical analysis, one often encounters unexpected pairings that spark curiosity and warrant further investigation.
This paper serves to unravel the intertwined relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the enduring viewership count for Days of Our Lives. While on the surface, these entities may appear as disparate as oil and water, a deeper scrutiny of the data reveals a rather surprising correlation that begs for elucidation.
Beginning with the assumption that statistical analysis is much like peeling an onion, one layer at a time, we delve into the historical context and the evolution of these seemingly distinct realms. At the intersection of nutrition education and daytime drama, we venture into uncharted territory, where numbers and narratives converge in an unexpectedly cohesive manner.
Lurking behind the scenes of this peculiar correlation is the potential for humor and irony, much like the plot twists and character drama of the soap opera itself. Though our study maintains a steadfast commitment to empirical rigor, one cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research topic. After all, who could have predicted that dietary expertise and television entertainment could be so tightly entwined?
Join us as we embark on this soapy affair of statistical inquiry, where the numbers on dietetic technicians and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives reveal themselves to be more than just figures on a spreadsheet. With a hint of skepticism and a dash of curiosity, let us uncover the mysteries that lie at the crossroads of public health and popular culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The present inquiry begins with a robust exploration of the scholarly landscape surrounding the entwined domains of dietary expertise and daytime drama. While this unusual pairing may initially appear as incongruous as mixing oil and vinegar, a thorough review of the literature exposes a tapestry of unexpected connections and correlations. Smith et al. (2017) elucidate the significance of dietary education in facilitating healthy eating habits, while Doe's seminal work (2015) underscores the enduring appeal of serial storytelling in the realm of television programming.

As we transition to the more whimsical side of the literature, it is imperative to note the unexpected sources of inspiration that have contributed to this exploratory endeavor. "The Joy of Cooking" provides a culinary lens through which to examine dietary themes, offering tantalizing recipes that may pique the interest of even the most fervent soap opera enthusiasts. Likewise, "Soap Opera Digest" serves as a captivating compendium of fictional relationships and melodramatic plotlines, offering a nuanced perspective into the world of daytime television that transcends the boundaries of empirical inquiry.

Turning to the domain of fiction, one cannot ignore the subtle influence of literary works that harbor thematic resonances with our peculiar research subject. "Eat, Pray, Love" offers a whimsical yet introspective exploration of nutritional and emotional sustenance, weaving a narrative that beckons readers to ponder the interplay between dietary choices and personal fulfillment. Furthermore, "Dietland" presents a satirical examination of societal attitudes toward body image and consumption, echoing the underlying themes of our investigation in a manner that is both thought-provoking and lighthearted.

Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, "The Game of Life" serves as a playful reminder of the intricate pathways that intertwine the realms of health and entertainment. As players navigate the virtual landscape of career choices and life events, they are reminded of the unpredictable nature of existence, mirroring the serendipitous discovery of the correlation between dietetic technicians and soap opera viewership in our own empirical pursuits.

In synthesizing the serious and the whimsical, the empirical and the imaginative, the literature review serves as a springboard into the uncharted waters of statistical inquiry. With a nod to the unexpected and a wink to the whimsical, this examination of the scholarly landscape sets the stage for a thought-provoking exploration of the soapy affair between dietetic technicians and Days of Our Lives viewership in North Carolina.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected yet fascinating association between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera, Days of Our Lives. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, a thorough analysis was conducted for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 elucidates a striking positive relationship, with p < 0.01, presenting a compelling argument for the entwined nature of dietary expertise and daytime drama. The implications of this correlation are discussed, shedding light on the potential implications for both the healthcare profession and the television industry.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of dietetic technicians and daytime television may seem like quite the odd couple at first glance. One wonders what connection, if any, could exist between individuals dedicated to fostering healthy eating habits and a beloved afternoon soap opera that has thrived for decades. However, in the realm of statistical analysis, one often encounters unexpected pairings that spark curiosity and warrant further investigation.
This paper serves to unravel the intertwined relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the enduring viewership count for Days of Our Lives. While on the surface, these entities may appear as disparate as oil and water, a deeper scrutiny of the data reveals a rather surprising correlation that begs for elucidation.
Beginning with the assumption that statistical analysis is much like peeling an onion, one layer at a time, we delve into the historical context and the evolution of these seemingly distinct realms. At the intersection of nutrition education and daytime drama, we venture into uncharted territory, where numbers and narratives converge in an unexpectedly cohesive manner.
Lurking behind the scenes of this peculiar correlation is the potential for humor and irony, much like the plot twists and character drama of the soap opera itself. Though our study maintains a steadfast commitment to empirical rigor, one cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research topic. After all, who could have predicted that dietary expertise and television entertainment could be so tightly entwined?
Join us as we embark on this soapy affair of statistical inquiry, where the numbers on dietetic technicians and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives reveal themselves to be more than just figures on a spreadsheet. With a hint of skepticism and a dash of curiosity, let us uncover the mysteries that lie at the crossroads of public health and popular culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the enigmatic relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives, a multidimensional approach was employed, likened to traversing the convoluted plotlines of a daytime soap opera. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the bastion of knowledge, Wikipedia, our research team embarked on a journey through the digital landscape in search of quantitative treasures from the years 2003 to 2021.

The first step in our research odyssey involved the identification and extraction of pertinent numerical data regarding the employment statistics of dietetic technicians across North Carolina's health care landscape. This involved navigating through labyrinthine databases and statistical archives, mirroring the resilience of a soap opera character during a dramatic plot arc.

Simultaneously, the viewership count for Days of Our Lives across the same period was unravelled from digital repositories, showcasing a parallel narrative trajectory to that of our data collection endeavor. Much like a seasoned detective pursuing a compelling lead, the team meticulously documented the ebb and flow of audience engagement with the soap opera, revealing patterns reminiscent of the episodic structure that defines this beloved television genre.

As we journeyed through this maze of data, the team harnessed the powers of statistical software, assuming the roles of alchemists transforming raw data into meaningful insights. Utilizing correlation analysis, the swirling currents of numerical data were harnessed to reveal the underlying connection between the employment of dietetic technicians and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives, not unlike the unexpected reveal of a long-lost character in a soap opera plot twist.

Furthermore, in a bid to enhance the robustness of our findings, we performed a sensitivity analysis to test the stability of our inferences and ensure the strength of our conclusions against perturbations in the data. This was akin to the deliberations of a cunning scriptwriter, meticulously crafting plotlines to withstand the scrutiny of fervent fans and relentless critics alike.

Finally, recognizing the potential for lurking confounding variables and spurious correlations akin to the hidden motivations of soap opera villains, the team delved into a comprehensive multivariate regression analysis. This allowed us to scrutinize the relationship between dietetic technicians and Days of Our Lives viewership through the lens of multiple influencing factors, revealing a nuanced understanding similar to that of unraveling the mystery behind a character's motives in the soap opera's storyline.

In summary, our methodology blended the rigor of statistical analysis with the dramatic flair of soap opera storytelling, culminating in the unveiling of a compelling correlation between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9240274, r-squared of 0.8538266, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected yet fascinating association between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera, Days of Our Lives. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, a thorough analysis was conducted for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 elucidates a striking positive relationship, with p < 0.01, presenting a compelling argument for the entwined nature of dietary expertise and daytime drama. The implications of this correlation are discussed, shedding light on the potential implications for both the healthcare profession and the television industry.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of dietetic technicians and daytime television may seem like quite the odd couple at first glance. One wonders what connection, if any, could exist between individuals dedicated to fostering healthy eating habits and a beloved afternoon soap opera that has thrived for decades. However, in the realm of statistical analysis, one often encounters unexpected pairings that spark curiosity and warrant further investigation.
This paper serves to unravel the intertwined relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the enduring viewership count for Days of Our Lives. While on the surface, these entities may appear as disparate as oil and water, a deeper scrutiny of the data reveals a rather surprising correlation that begs for elucidation.
Beginning with the assumption that statistical analysis is much like peeling an onion, one layer at a time, we delve into the historical context and the evolution of these seemingly distinct realms. At the intersection of nutrition education and daytime drama, we venture into uncharted territory, where numbers and narratives converge in an unexpectedly cohesive manner.
Lurking behind the scenes of this peculiar correlation is the potential for humor and irony, much like the plot twists and character drama of the soap opera itself. Though our study maintains a steadfast commitment to empirical rigor, one cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research topic. After all, who could have predicted that dietary expertise and television entertainment could be so tightly entwined?
Join us as we embark on this soapy affair of statistical inquiry, where the numbers on dietetic technicians and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives reveal themselves to be more than just figures on a spreadsheet. With a hint of skepticism and a dash of curiosity, let us uncover the mysteries that lie at the crossroads of public health and popular culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives yielded some fascinating results. For the time period from 2003 to 2021, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 was identified, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8538266 further cemented the robustness of this association.

Upon a casual glance at the scatterplot (Fig. 1), one cannot help but marvel at the tight clustering of data points, which tell the tale of a soap opera entangling itself with the world of dietary expertise in a manner that is both unexpected and bemusing. The p-value of less than 0.01 fortified the statistical significance of this correlation, prompting us to delve deeper into this curious connection.

While the allure of soap opera drama may seem distant from the realm of dietetic technicians, our findings suggest that there exists a palpable link between the two, akin to a dramatic plot twist. Whether this association is driven by the dietary habits of soap opera enthusiasts or the stress-relieving allure of daytime television for dietetic professionals remains an enigma that captures the imagination.

The implications of this correlation, while amusing to ponder, present an opportunity for further inquiry into the interplay of popular culture and public health. It is clear that the world of daytime television and the pursuit of optimal nutrition are not as distant as one might assume. Our study ultimately emphasizes the multifaceted nature of statistical analysis, where unexpected relationships occasionally steal the spotlight and leave us all spellbound with their quirks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected yet fascinating association between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera, Days of Our Lives. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, a thorough analysis was conducted for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 elucidates a striking positive relationship, with p < 0.01, presenting a compelling argument for the entwined nature of dietary expertise and daytime drama. The implications of this correlation are discussed, shedding light on the potential implications for both the healthcare profession and the television industry.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The present inquiry begins with a robust exploration of the scholarly landscape surrounding the entwined domains of dietary expertise and daytime drama. While this unusual pairing may initially appear as incongruous as mixing oil and vinegar, a thorough review of the literature exposes a tapestry of unexpected connections and correlations. Smith et al. (2017) elucidate the significance of dietary education in facilitating healthy eating habits, while Doe's seminal work (2015) underscores the enduring appeal of serial storytelling in the realm of television programming.
As we transition to the more whimsical side of the literature, it is imperative to note the unexpected sources of inspiration that have contributed to this exploratory endeavor. "The Joy of Cooking" provides a culinary lens through which to examine dietary themes, offering tantalizing recipes that may pique the interest of even the most fervent soap opera enthusiasts. Likewise, "Soap Opera Digest" serves as a captivating compendium of fictional relationships and melodramatic plotlines, offering a nuanced perspective into the world of daytime television that transcends the boundaries of empirical inquiry.
Turning to the domain of fiction, one cannot ignore the subtle influence of literary works that harbor thematic resonances with our peculiar research subject. "Eat, Pray, Love" offers a whimsical yet introspective exploration of nutritional and emotional sustenance, weaving a narrative that beckons readers to ponder the interplay between dietary choices and personal fulfillment. Furthermore, "Dietland" presents a satirical examination of societal attitudes toward body image and consumption, echoing the underlying themes of our investigation in a manner that is both thought-provoking and lighthearted.
Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, "The Game of Life" serves as a playful reminder of the intricate pathways that intertwine the realms of health and entertainment. As players navigate the virtual landscape of career choices and life events, they are reminded of the unpredictable nature of existence, mirroring the serendipitous discovery of the correlation between dietetic technicians and soap opera viewership in our own empirical pursuits.
In synthesizing the serious and the whimsical, the empirical and the imaginative, the literature review serves as a springboard into the uncharted waters of statistical inquiry. With a nod to the unexpected and a wink to the whimsical, this examination of the scholarly landscape sets the stage for a thought-provoking exploration of the soapy affair between dietetic technicians and Days of Our Lives viewership in North Carolina.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives yielded some fascinating results. For the time period from 2003 to 2021, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 was identified, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8538266 further cemented the robustness of this association.
Upon a casual glance at the scatterplot (Fig. 1), one cannot help but marvel at the tight clustering of data points, which tell the tale of a soap opera entangling itself with the world of dietary expertise in a manner that is both unexpected and bemusing. The p-value of less than 0.01 fortified the statistical significance of this correlation, prompting us to delve deeper into this curious connection.
While the allure of soap opera drama may seem distant from the realm of dietetic technicians, our findings suggest that there exists a palpable link between the two, akin to a dramatic plot twist. Whether this association is driven by the dietary habits of soap opera enthusiasts or the stress-relieving allure of daytime television for dietetic professionals remains an enigma that captures the imagination.
The implications of this correlation, while amusing to ponder, present an opportunity for further inquiry into the interplay of popular culture and public health. It is clear that the world of daytime television and the pursuit of optimal nutrition are not as distant as one might assume. Our study ultimately emphasizes the multifaceted nature of statistical analysis, where unexpected relationships occasionally steal the spotlight and leave us all spellbound with their quirks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation unequivocally affirm the surprising yet undeniable link between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Remarkably, our findings not only align with prior research but also shed light on the whimsical undercurrents that pervade the realms of dietary expertise and daytime drama.

Smith et al. (2017) emphasized the pivotal role of dietary education in cultivating healthy eating habits, a theme that resonates with the premise of our inquiry. It seems that the loyal viewers of Days of Our Lives, enthralled by the captivating plotlines, might also exhibit dietary preferences that align with the principles advocated by dietetic technicians. Could it be that the quintessential "Days" fan subconsciously seeks culinary inspiration from the tantalizing recipes of "The Joy of Cooking," contributing to the observed correlation? This intriguing possibility beckons for further exploration and perhaps a cooking show spinoff featuring the characters of Salem indulging in nutritious delights.

Moreover, Doe's (2015) seminal work on the enduring allure of serial storytelling in television programming echoes the captivating pull of Days of Our Lives on our unsuspecting dietetic cohorts. The inexplicably high correlation coefficient acts as a testament to the enduring magnetism of the soap opera, drawing in dietetic technicians like moths to a melodramatic flame. The soap opera's ability to weave intricate narratives seems to cast a spell not only on its viewers but also on those tasked with ensuring optimal nutrition, blurring the boundaries between professional responsibility and guilty pleasure.

The galvanizing impact of literature, be it the whimsy of "The Game of Life" or the satirical introspections of "Dietland," highlights the diverse sources that have subtly influenced our study's pursuits. The statistical robustness of the observed correlation is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains, akin to a complex recipe where the unexpected fusion of ingredients yields a delectable dish.

As we grapple with the implications of our findings, one cannot overlook the thought-provoking revelation that the world of daytime television and the pursuit of optimal nutrition share a peculiar kinship. Whether this correlation is driven by the dietary habits of soap opera enthusiasts, the stress-relieving allure of daytime television for dietetic professionals, or a serendipitous amalgamation of both, remains an enigma worthy of further investigation. The interactive dynamics between popular culture and public health have revealed a complexity that beckons for a more nuanced inquiry, ensnaring us in a web of wonder and curiosity.

In conclusion, our study has not only validated previous research but has also unraveled a soapy affair that challenges conventional wisdom and beckons for further exploration. The enigmatic interplay between dietetic technicians and Days of Our Lives viewership transcends mere statistical correlation, encapsulating a narrative that promises to unravel the entwined threads of dietary expertise and daytime drama in a manner that is both captivating and unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and Viewership count for Days of Our Lives. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected yet fascinating association between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera, Days of Our Lives. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, a thorough analysis was conducted for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 elucidates a striking positive relationship, with p < 0.01, presenting a compelling argument for the entwined nature of dietary expertise and daytime drama. The implications of this correlation are discussed, shedding light on the potential implications for both the healthcare profession and the television industry.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of dietetic technicians and daytime television may seem like quite the odd couple at first glance. One wonders what connection, if any, could exist between individuals dedicated to fostering healthy eating habits and a beloved afternoon soap opera that has thrived for decades. However, in the realm of statistical analysis, one often encounters unexpected pairings that spark curiosity and warrant further investigation.
This paper serves to unravel the intertwined relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the enduring viewership count for Days of Our Lives. While on the surface, these entities may appear as disparate as oil and water, a deeper scrutiny of the data reveals a rather surprising correlation that begs for elucidation.
Beginning with the assumption that statistical analysis is much like peeling an onion, one layer at a time, we delve into the historical context and the evolution of these seemingly distinct realms. At the intersection of nutrition education and daytime drama, we venture into uncharted territory, where numbers and narratives converge in an unexpectedly cohesive manner.
Lurking behind the scenes of this peculiar correlation is the potential for humor and irony, much like the plot twists and character drama of the soap opera itself. Though our study maintains a steadfast commitment to empirical rigor, one cannot help but acknowledge the whimsical nature of our research topic. After all, who could have predicted that dietary expertise and television entertainment could be so tightly entwined?
Join us as we embark on this soapy affair of statistical inquiry, where the numbers on dietetic technicians and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives reveal themselves to be more than just figures on a spreadsheet. With a hint of skepticism and a dash of curiosity, let us uncover the mysteries that lie at the crossroads of public health and popular culture.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives yielded some fascinating results. For the time period from 2003 to 2021, a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 was identified, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8538266 further cemented the robustness of this association.
Upon a casual glance at the scatterplot (Fig. 1), one cannot help but marvel at the tight clustering of data points, which tell the tale of a soap opera entangling itself with the world of dietary expertise in a manner that is both unexpected and bemusing. The p-value of less than 0.01 fortified the statistical significance of this correlation, prompting us to delve deeper into this curious connection.
While the allure of soap opera drama may seem distant from the realm of dietetic technicians, our findings suggest that there exists a palpable link between the two, akin to a dramatic plot twist. Whether this association is driven by the dietary habits of soap opera enthusiasts or the stress-relieving allure of daytime television for dietetic professionals remains an enigma that captures the imagination.
The implications of this correlation, while amusing to ponder, present an opportunity for further inquiry into the interplay of popular culture and public health. It is clear that the world of daytime television and the pursuit of optimal nutrition are not as distant as one might assume. Our study ultimately emphasizes the multifaceted nature of statistical analysis, where unexpected relationships occasionally steal the spotlight and leave us all spellbound with their quirks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the entwined relationship between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for Days of Our Lives has proven to be a captivating enigma worthy of contemplation. Our study, while rooted in empirical rigor, has undeniably tickled the funny bone with its unexpected findings. As we peered into the statistical looking glass, the soapy affair between dietary expertise and daytime drama emerged as a tale of intrigue and amusement, much like a well-crafted soap opera plot.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9240274, with its p-value of less than 0.01, speaks to a connection that is as compelling as a cliffhanger episode. The scatterplot, with its tightly knit data points, almost resembles the intricate web of character relationships in a daytime soap. While our findings may initially raise eyebrows, they beckon us to consider the playful dance between serious matters of health and the lighthearted escape offered by television drama.

However, as we reflect on the implications of this study, we find ourselves at a crossroads. While the statistical tango between dietetic technicians and Days of Our Lives viewership has provided ample food for thought (pun intended), we are left with the resounding conclusion that no further research in this area is warranted. As such, we bid adieu to this soapy statistical playground, content in the knowledge that empirical inquiry has once again delivered unexpected delight.

Thus, with a twinkle in our eyes and a chuckle in our hearts, we affirm that this quirky intersection of dietary expertise and daytime television has been thoroughly explored, leaving nary a crumb of curiosity behind. In the grand theater of statistical analysis, this peculiar pairing has taken its final bow, leaving us with a fond farewell and a lingering smile.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Culinary Communications and Cultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Soap Opera and Nutritional Sciences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Weight of Soap Opera: A Soapy Affair between Dietetic Technicians and Days of Our Lives Viewership in North Carolina with an abstract of This paper delves into the unexpected yet fascinating association between the number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina and the viewership count for the long-running soap opera, Days of Our Lives. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, a thorough analysis was conducted for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9240274 elucidates a striking positive relationship, with p < 0.01, presenting a compelling argument for the entwined nature of dietary expertise and daytime drama. The implications of this correlation are discussed, shedding light on the potential implications for both the healthcare profession and the television industry.

ChatGPT:

Days of Our Lives viewership, dietetic technicians in North Carolina, correlation analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics data, Wikipedia data, soap opera viewership, dietary expertise, healthcare profession, television industry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of dietetic technicians in North Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina

Viewership count for Days of Our Lives
Detailed data title: Metered viewership count for Days of Our Lives
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Viewership count for Days of Our Lives

Correlation r = 0.9240274 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8538266 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Viewership count for Days of Our Lives) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-8. 0.0000000163001233485839500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.6E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 61,349,229 random variables You don't actually need 61 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina (Dietetic Technicians)810700710620460420320370350370370400350280300260270260130
Viewership count for Days of Our Lives (Nielson share)3100000270000026000002300000210000022000002200000200000020000002100000190000020500001800000160000016000001600000140000012000001200000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([810,700,710,620,460,420,320,370,350,370,370,400,350,280,300,260,270,260,130,])
array_2 = np.array([3100000,2700000,2600000,2300000,2100000,2200000,2200000,2000000,2000000,2100000,1900000,2050000,1800000,1600000,1600000,1600000,1400000,1200000,1200000,])
array_1_name = "The number of dietetic technicians in North Carolina"
array_2_name = "Viewership count for Days of Our Lives"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 2550 · Black Variable ID: 12390 · Red Variable ID: 87
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0