about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,788 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Education and the second variable is Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Education Master's degrees awarded decreased, there were fewer teachers commuting to work. With fewer teachers on the road, there was a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions contributing to air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. The correlation between the two may seem far-fetched, but it appears that in this case, less education has led to cleaner air!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of an idyllic suburban street in Appleton, Wisconsin, with charming whimsical graphics. The scene should depict a decrease in traffic as fewer teachers commute to work, perhaps by showing fewer cars on the road and a clearer sky. The image should convey a sense of tranquility and a positive environmental impact, with a touch of playful fantasy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Pop art Sci-fi fantacy Glitch art Cutsy graphics
ChatGPT: Cutsy graphics

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin, in the following situation: As the number of Education Master's degrees awarded decreased, there were fewer teachers commuting to work. With fewer teachers on the road, there was a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions contributing to air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. The correlation between the two may seem far-fetched, but it appears that in this case, less education has led to cleaner air!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Appleton, Wisconsin, we see fewer teachers commuting to work due to a decrease in Education Master's degrees awarded. The streets appear less crowded with cars, and the air seems clearer. The reduction in traffic has significantly lowered greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to cleaner air in the city.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy graphics ] and depicting this scene: In Appleton, Wisconsin, we see fewer teachers commuting to work due to a decrease in Education Master's degrees awarded. The streets appear less crowded with cars, and the air seems clearer. The reduction in traffic has significantly lowered greenhouse gas emissions, contributing to cleaner air in the city. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of an idyllic suburban street in Appleton, Wisconsin, with charming whimsical graphics. The scene should depict a decrease in traffic as fewer teachers commute to work, perhaps by showing fewer cars on the road and a clearer sky. The image should convey a sense of tranquility and a positive environmental impact, with a touch of playful fantasy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in Education caused Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience

The Journal of Eclectic Environmental Education

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the pivotal link between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the atmospheric quality in the delightful locale of Appleton, Wisconsin. While many may assume that the connection between advanced degrees in education and air pollution is as thin as the air in a smog-filled city, our findings may just blow your mind. Our research team meticulously crunched the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, and what we discovered might leave you breathless. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and a p-value of less than 0.01 spanning from 2012 to 2021, our results indicate a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. So, put on your thinking cap and take a deep breath as we dive into the surprising connections between education and environmental ambiance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the pivotal link between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the atmospheric quality in the delightful locale of Appleton, Wisconsin. While many may assume that the connection between advanced degrees in education and air pollution is as thin as the air in a smog-filled city, our findings may just blow your mind. Our research team meticulously crunched the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, and what we discovered might leave you breathless. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and a p-value of less than 0.01 spanning from 2012 to 2021, our results indicate a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. So, put on your thinking cap and take a deep breath as we dive into the surprising connections between education and environmental ambiance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the sweet scent of academic inquiry and the crisp aroma of statistical analysis come together in this study to explore the unexpected relationship between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in the charming city of Appleton, Wisconsin. While one might think that the only fumes prevalent in the halls of academia are from the coffee pot in the faculty lounge, our research has uncovered a correlation that may leave you gasping for breath. Hold onto your pocket protectors, because we're about to embark on a scholarly journey that will not only educate, but also ventilate your understanding of the interconnectedness of human knowledge and environmental well-being.

As researchers, we are constantly inundated with the phrase "correlation does not imply causation," but what if we told you that sometimes correlations can leave a lingering scent of causation in the air? Well, that's precisely what we aim to unpack in this paper. We're delving into the intersection of scholarly pursuits and the quality of the air we breathe, because nothing says academic research like unraveling the mysteries of the universe while also reducing our carbon footprint.

Now, you might be contemplating how we even ended up exploring such an unusual pairing of variables. Picture this – a group of intrepid academics, armed with spreadsheets and air quality monitors, venturing forth to scrutinize the synergy between the pursuit of Master's degrees in Education and the levels of air pollutants swirling around in Appleton. It's like a high-stakes game of "Guess That Correlation," but with a lot more textbooks and a lot less oxygen.

So, buckle up and take a deep breath (hopefully not too deep if you're in Appleton), because we're about to embark on a journey that will not only illuminate the impact of education but also leave you feeling lighter than air... unless, of course, you're inhaling some of that Wisconsin smog.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the pivotal link between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the atmospheric quality in the delightful locale of Appleton, Wisconsin. While many may assume that the connection between advanced degrees in education and air pollution is as thin as the air in a smog-filled city, our findings may just blow your mind. Our research team meticulously crunched the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, and what we discovered might leave you breathless. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and a p-value of less than 0.01 spanning from 2012 to 2021, our results indicate a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. So, put on your thinking cap and take a deep breath as we dive into the surprising connections between education and environmental ambiance.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet scent of academic inquiry and the crisp aroma of statistical analysis come together in this study to explore the unexpected relationship between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in the charming city of Appleton, Wisconsin. While one might think that the only fumes prevalent in the halls of academia are from the coffee pot in the faculty lounge, our research has uncovered a correlation that may leave you gasping for breath. Hold onto your pocket protectors, because we're about to embark on a scholarly journey that will not only educate, but also ventilate your understanding of the interconnectedness of human knowledge and environmental well-being.
As researchers, we are constantly inundated with the phrase "correlation does not imply causation," but what if we told you that sometimes correlations can leave a lingering scent of causation in the air? Well, that's precisely what we aim to unpack in this paper. We're delving into the intersection of scholarly pursuits and the quality of the air we breathe, because nothing says academic research like unraveling the mysteries of the universe while also reducing our carbon footprint.
Now, you might be contemplating how we even ended up exploring such an unusual pairing of variables. Picture this – a group of intrepid academics, armed with spreadsheets and air quality monitors, venturing forth to scrutinize the synergy between the pursuit of Master's degrees in Education and the levels of air pollutants swirling around in Appleton. It's like a high-stakes game of "Guess That Correlation," but with a lot more textbooks and a lot less oxygen.
So, buckle up and take a deep breath (hopefully not too deep if you're in Appleton), because we're about to embark on a journey that will not only illuminate the impact of education but also leave you feeling lighter than air... unless, of course, you're inhaling some of that Wisconsin smog.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Emissions and Education: A Multivariate Analysis of Air Quality and Graduate Degrees" by Smith et al., the authors find a surprising relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in urban areas. They suggest that as the number of education degrees increases, so does the concentration of particulate matter in the atmosphere. The research team at the Center for Atmospheric Studies at the University of Smog City delves deep into the statistical methodologies to unpack this intriguing association. However, as intriguing as this study may sound, it pales in comparison to the revelations we are about to uncover in our own investigation.

Moving on to "Learning to Breathe: The Impact of Education on Air Quality" by Doe, the study examines the potential influence of educational attainment on environmental well-being. The findings reveal a nuanced interplay between knowledge acquisition and atmospheric conditions, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate the unexpected ties between scholarly pursuits and the purity of the air we breathe. But hold onto your oxygen masks, because we're about to make a leap from educational theory to pop culture references and fictional realms that are in no way related to our study, but we're going there anyway!

Let's take a detour into some non-fiction works that might seem relevant, such as Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth: The Atmospheric Ramifications of Education Reform." Perhaps we'll also delve into "Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson, not because it's directly related to our research, but because we just want to leaf through it for some fresh air, if you know what we mean.

Now, let's bring some fiction into the mix because why not? How about "The Airbender's Education: An Avatar's Guide to Atmospheric Mastery" by Aang or "The Smog of War: A Study in Airborne Anarchy" by George R.R. Smogin'? These fictitious literary works may not hold any scientific value for our study, but hey, we could all use a good laugh in the midst of academic toil, right?

And who could forget the classic battle of "Monopoly: Air Pollution Edition," where players compete to see who can amass the most carbon emissions? Ah, the timeless joy of real estate and environmental degradation – what a combination! Unfortunately, this game has as much to do with our research as a cat has to do with calculus, but we just couldn't resist bringing it up.

Now, with these unorthodox literary and pop culture references, we resurface from the depths of whimsy into the sobering realm of academic analysis. But fear not, dear reader, for our findings are as refreshing as a gust of wind on a sultry day. Stay tuned as we unravel the mystifying connection between Master's degrees in Education and the air pollution swirling through the avenues of Appleton, Wisconsin. It's an adventure that will leave you asthmatic...with laughter, of course.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the pivotal link between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the atmospheric quality in the delightful locale of Appleton, Wisconsin. While many may assume that the connection between advanced degrees in education and air pollution is as thin as the air in a smog-filled city, our findings may just blow your mind. Our research team meticulously crunched the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, and what we discovered might leave you breathless. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and a p-value of less than 0.01 spanning from 2012 to 2021, our results indicate a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. So, put on your thinking cap and take a deep breath as we dive into the surprising connections between education and environmental ambiance.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet scent of academic inquiry and the crisp aroma of statistical analysis come together in this study to explore the unexpected relationship between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in the charming city of Appleton, Wisconsin. While one might think that the only fumes prevalent in the halls of academia are from the coffee pot in the faculty lounge, our research has uncovered a correlation that may leave you gasping for breath. Hold onto your pocket protectors, because we're about to embark on a scholarly journey that will not only educate, but also ventilate your understanding of the interconnectedness of human knowledge and environmental well-being.
As researchers, we are constantly inundated with the phrase "correlation does not imply causation," but what if we told you that sometimes correlations can leave a lingering scent of causation in the air? Well, that's precisely what we aim to unpack in this paper. We're delving into the intersection of scholarly pursuits and the quality of the air we breathe, because nothing says academic research like unraveling the mysteries of the universe while also reducing our carbon footprint.
Now, you might be contemplating how we even ended up exploring such an unusual pairing of variables. Picture this – a group of intrepid academics, armed with spreadsheets and air quality monitors, venturing forth to scrutinize the synergy between the pursuit of Master's degrees in Education and the levels of air pollutants swirling around in Appleton. It's like a high-stakes game of "Guess That Correlation," but with a lot more textbooks and a lot less oxygen.
So, buckle up and take a deep breath (hopefully not too deep if you're in Appleton), because we're about to embark on a journey that will not only illuminate the impact of education but also leave you feeling lighter than air... unless, of course, you're inhaling some of that Wisconsin smog.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Now, onto the nitty-gritty details of how we meticulously untangled the web of statistical correlations between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in Appleton. Our research approach was as methodical as an asthmatic statistician carefully measuring their p-values.

Illuminating Data Collection:
First off, we had to get our hands on the juicy data that would fuel this academic escapade. We delved into the digital depths of the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, armed with nothing but determination and a voracious appetite for spreadsheets. We scoured through the datasets, sifting through numbers and variables like enthusiastic treasure hunters in pursuit of the ultimate statistical gold.

Alright, "Data Cleaning" – it's not as glamorous as it sounds:
Once we had our grubby hands on the data, it was time to roll up our sleeves and get messy with some good ol' data cleaning. We ferreted out missing values, bid farewell to outliers, and massaged the numbers until they were as pristine as a freshly sterilized laboratory pipette. After all, you can't build a sturdy statistical house on a shaky foundation of messy data. We donned our metaphorical hazmat suits and scrubbed those datasets until they sparkled.

Enter the Statistical Cauldron:
With clean data in hand, we brewed up a potent statistical potion to test the relationship between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution. We stirred in a hearty dose of correlation analysis, sprinkled in some regression models, and let it all simmer over the bubbling cauldron of statistical significance. The result? A concoction so statistically robust, it could rival Snape's most potent brews.

Adjusting for Confounding Variables – Unraveling the Mystery:
The road to statistical enlightenment is never smooth, especially when confounding variables are lurking in the shadows. We took a cautious approach, making sure to account for any sneaky influences that could muddy the waters of our analysis. It was like conducting a forensic investigation, except instead of fingerprints, we were scrutinizing coefficients and covariates. We meticulously combed through the data, untangling the threads of causation from the spider's web of correlation.

Time Travel with Trend Analysis:
To add a touch of temporal flair to our analysis, we dabbled in trend analysis across the years 2012 to 2021. It was like embarking on a statistical journey through time, observing how the relationship between education and air quality evolved over the years. We pored over the data like time-traveling sleuths, unraveling the mysteries of statistical change across the temporal landscape.

The Multifaceted Lens of Sensitivity Analysis:
Finally, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected our analysis to the scrutiny of sensitivity tests. It was like stress-testing a bridge to ensure it could withstand the weight of statistical scrutiny. We probed and poked at our models, checking for any vulnerabilities and reinforcing them like statistical fortresses.

With our trusty statistical toolbox and a dash of academic moxie, we unleashed the full force of our research methodology, leaving no statistical stone unturned as we pursued the elusive link between education and atmospheric purity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8295542, r-squared of 0.6881601, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the pivotal link between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the atmospheric quality in the delightful locale of Appleton, Wisconsin. While many may assume that the connection between advanced degrees in education and air pollution is as thin as the air in a smog-filled city, our findings may just blow your mind. Our research team meticulously crunched the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, and what we discovered might leave you breathless. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and a p-value of less than 0.01 spanning from 2012 to 2021, our results indicate a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. So, put on your thinking cap and take a deep breath as we dive into the surprising connections between education and environmental ambiance.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the sweet scent of academic inquiry and the crisp aroma of statistical analysis come together in this study to explore the unexpected relationship between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in the charming city of Appleton, Wisconsin. While one might think that the only fumes prevalent in the halls of academia are from the coffee pot in the faculty lounge, our research has uncovered a correlation that may leave you gasping for breath. Hold onto your pocket protectors, because we're about to embark on a scholarly journey that will not only educate, but also ventilate your understanding of the interconnectedness of human knowledge and environmental well-being.
As researchers, we are constantly inundated with the phrase "correlation does not imply causation," but what if we told you that sometimes correlations can leave a lingering scent of causation in the air? Well, that's precisely what we aim to unpack in this paper. We're delving into the intersection of scholarly pursuits and the quality of the air we breathe, because nothing says academic research like unraveling the mysteries of the universe while also reducing our carbon footprint.
Now, you might be contemplating how we even ended up exploring such an unusual pairing of variables. Picture this – a group of intrepid academics, armed with spreadsheets and air quality monitors, venturing forth to scrutinize the synergy between the pursuit of Master's degrees in Education and the levels of air pollutants swirling around in Appleton. It's like a high-stakes game of "Guess That Correlation," but with a lot more textbooks and a lot less oxygen.
So, buckle up and take a deep breath (hopefully not too deep if you're in Appleton), because we're about to embark on a journey that will not only illuminate the impact of education but also leave you feeling lighter than air... unless, of course, you're inhaling some of that Wisconsin smog.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our rigorous statistical analysis revealed an eye-opening correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the level of air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin from 2012 to 2021. If we were any more astonished, we'd have to check our pulse to make sure we were still breathing, albeit in a non-polluted area.

The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 (not to toot our own horn, but it's pretty impressive) depicts the strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's like watching a beautiful symphony of data points, with the Master's degrees in Education on one end and the air pollution levels on the other, harmonizing in a statistical ballet that even Tchaikovsky would envy. Who knew that educational attainment and atmospheric quality could waltz so elegantly together?

The r-squared value of 0.6881601 emphasizes that a substantial 68.8% of the variation in air pollution levels in Appleton can be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education. In the grand scheme of statistical relationships, this is like finding a perfect matching pair of socks in a drawer full of mismatched ones – surprisingly rare and incredibly satisfying.

Now, for the moment you've all been waiting for – the p-value. Let's just say that the p-value is so small, it makes an atom look like King Kong. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently assert that this correlation is not a statistical fluke; it's as real as the air you're breathing. Well, perhaps not as real if you're in Appleton, but you get the drift.

In conclusion, our results suggest that the pursuit of advanced degrees in Education may indeed have an impact on the ambient air quality in Appleton, Wisconsin. So, the next time someone tells you to "go educate yourself," you might want to consider doing it for the betterment of the air we all share. After all, who knew that education could not only enlighten minds but also clear the air?

Our findings open the door to a myriad of future investigations and interventions, and we can only hope that this study serves as a breath of fresh air for the field of education and environmental research. There you have it, folks – the unexpected, the illuminating, and the statistically significant connection between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in Appleton. Keep on breathing, and keep on learning – the two may just go hand in hand more than we ever realized.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the pivotal link between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the atmospheric quality in the delightful locale of Appleton, Wisconsin. While many may assume that the connection between advanced degrees in education and air pollution is as thin as the air in a smog-filled city, our findings may just blow your mind. Our research team meticulously crunched the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, and what we discovered might leave you breathless. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and a p-value of less than 0.01 spanning from 2012 to 2021, our results indicate a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. So, put on your thinking cap and take a deep breath as we dive into the surprising connections between education and environmental ambiance.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Emissions and Education: A Multivariate Analysis of Air Quality and Graduate Degrees" by Smith et al., the authors find a surprising relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and levels of air pollution in urban areas. They suggest that as the number of education degrees increases, so does the concentration of particulate matter in the atmosphere. The research team at the Center for Atmospheric Studies at the University of Smog City delves deep into the statistical methodologies to unpack this intriguing association. However, as intriguing as this study may sound, it pales in comparison to the revelations we are about to uncover in our own investigation.
Moving on to "Learning to Breathe: The Impact of Education on Air Quality" by Doe, the study examines the potential influence of educational attainment on environmental well-being. The findings reveal a nuanced interplay between knowledge acquisition and atmospheric conditions, leaving readers with a breath of fresh air as they contemplate the unexpected ties between scholarly pursuits and the purity of the air we breathe. But hold onto your oxygen masks, because we're about to make a leap from educational theory to pop culture references and fictional realms that are in no way related to our study, but we're going there anyway!
Let's take a detour into some non-fiction works that might seem relevant, such as Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth: The Atmospheric Ramifications of Education Reform." Perhaps we'll also delve into "Silent Spring" by Rachel Carson, not because it's directly related to our research, but because we just want to leaf through it for some fresh air, if you know what we mean.
Now, let's bring some fiction into the mix because why not? How about "The Airbender's Education: An Avatar's Guide to Atmospheric Mastery" by Aang or "The Smog of War: A Study in Airborne Anarchy" by George R.R. Smogin'? These fictitious literary works may not hold any scientific value for our study, but hey, we could all use a good laugh in the midst of academic toil, right?
And who could forget the classic battle of "Monopoly: Air Pollution Edition," where players compete to see who can amass the most carbon emissions? Ah, the timeless joy of real estate and environmental degradation – what a combination! Unfortunately, this game has as much to do with our research as a cat has to do with calculus, but we just couldn't resist bringing it up.
Now, with these unorthodox literary and pop culture references, we resurface from the depths of whimsy into the sobering realm of academic analysis. But fear not, dear reader, for our findings are as refreshing as a gust of wind on a sultry day. Stay tuned as we unravel the mystifying connection between Master's degrees in Education and the air pollution swirling through the avenues of Appleton, Wisconsin. It's an adventure that will leave you asthmatic...with laughter, of course.

[[RESULTS]]
Our rigorous statistical analysis revealed an eye-opening correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the level of air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin from 2012 to 2021. If we were any more astonished, we'd have to check our pulse to make sure we were still breathing, albeit in a non-polluted area.
The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 (not to toot our own horn, but it's pretty impressive) depicts the strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's like watching a beautiful symphony of data points, with the Master's degrees in Education on one end and the air pollution levels on the other, harmonizing in a statistical ballet that even Tchaikovsky would envy. Who knew that educational attainment and atmospheric quality could waltz so elegantly together?
The r-squared value of 0.6881601 emphasizes that a substantial 68.8% of the variation in air pollution levels in Appleton can be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education. In the grand scheme of statistical relationships, this is like finding a perfect matching pair of socks in a drawer full of mismatched ones – surprisingly rare and incredibly satisfying.
Now, for the moment you've all been waiting for – the p-value. Let's just say that the p-value is so small, it makes an atom look like King Kong. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently assert that this correlation is not a statistical fluke; it's as real as the air you're breathing. Well, perhaps not as real if you're in Appleton, but you get the drift.
In conclusion, our results suggest that the pursuit of advanced degrees in Education may indeed have an impact on the ambient air quality in Appleton, Wisconsin. So, the next time someone tells you to "go educate yourself," you might want to consider doing it for the betterment of the air we all share. After all, who knew that education could not only enlighten minds but also clear the air?
Our findings open the door to a myriad of future investigations and interventions, and we can only hope that this study serves as a breath of fresh air for the field of education and environmental research. There you have it, folks – the unexpected, the illuminating, and the statistically significant connection between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in Appleton. Keep on breathing, and keep on learning – the two may just go hand in hand more than we ever realized.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have blown away any lingering doubts about the relationship between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. The correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 illuminated a powerful link between these variables, much like a storm illuminates the sky – unpredictably and with a bang.

Our results definitely support the prior research highlighted in our literature review, albeit with a touch of whimsy. Just like how the Center for Atmospheric Studies at the University of Smog City delved deep into statistical methodologies, we dug deep into our data, unearthing a correlation so strong it could lift a house off its foundation – though we do not recommend testing this hypothesis.

Moving on to the unexpected ties between scholarly pursuits and air purity, our study not only chuckled along but also provided substantial evidence to indicate that education attainment and atmospheric conditions are like two peas in a pod, assuming that pod is an environmentally conscious vegetable garden.

Our scatterplot – the Leonardo da Vinci of data visualization, if we do say so ourselves – depicted a strong linear relationship between Master's degrees and air pollution levels. It's almost as if the data points were dancing a tango of statistical significance, with each step revealing a new twist in the narrative of educational impact on the air we breathe. It's as though the data formed a compelling argument of its own, surprising us like a plot twist in a suspense novel.

The r-squared value of 0.6881601 further cemented the weight of our findings like a well-anchored boat in choppy waters. This value shows that a substantial 68.8% of the variation in air pollution levels in Appleton can be attributed to the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education. That's a higher percentage than the success rate of most blind dates.

The p-value was so small, it made the Higgs boson balloon into an ego problem. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the correlation is as clear as the air you'd hope to breathe in Appleton. In essence, our results are not a statistical fluke but a bonafide revelation, proving that education can not only enlighten minds but also clear the air – quite literally.

In conclusion, our study shone a light on the unexpected and statistically significant connection between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. It's as if we stumbled upon a diamond in a field of pseudoscientific rocks, and we hope that our findings serve as a breath of fresh air for the fields of education and environmental research. After all, who knew that obtaining a Master's degree could not only elevate one's knowledge but also have an impact on the ambient air we share? Ah, the mysteries of statistics – surprising and delightful as a cosmic joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Education and Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to uncover the pivotal link between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the atmospheric quality in the delightful locale of Appleton, Wisconsin. While many may assume that the connection between advanced degrees in education and air pollution is as thin as the air in a smog-filled city, our findings may just blow your mind. Our research team meticulously crunched the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, and what we discovered might leave you breathless. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and a p-value of less than 0.01 spanning from 2012 to 2021, our results indicate a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. So, put on your thinking cap and take a deep breath as we dive into the surprising connections between education and environmental ambiance.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the sweet scent of academic inquiry and the crisp aroma of statistical analysis come together in this study to explore the unexpected relationship between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in the charming city of Appleton, Wisconsin. While one might think that the only fumes prevalent in the halls of academia are from the coffee pot in the faculty lounge, our research has uncovered a correlation that may leave you gasping for breath. Hold onto your pocket protectors, because we're about to embark on a scholarly journey that will not only educate, but also ventilate your understanding of the interconnectedness of human knowledge and environmental well-being.
As researchers, we are constantly inundated with the phrase "correlation does not imply causation," but what if we told you that sometimes correlations can leave a lingering scent of causation in the air? Well, that's precisely what we aim to unpack in this paper. We're delving into the intersection of scholarly pursuits and the quality of the air we breathe, because nothing says academic research like unraveling the mysteries of the universe while also reducing our carbon footprint.
Now, you might be contemplating how we even ended up exploring such an unusual pairing of variables. Picture this – a group of intrepid academics, armed with spreadsheets and air quality monitors, venturing forth to scrutinize the synergy between the pursuit of Master's degrees in Education and the levels of air pollutants swirling around in Appleton. It's like a high-stakes game of "Guess That Correlation," but with a lot more textbooks and a lot less oxygen.
So, buckle up and take a deep breath (hopefully not too deep if you're in Appleton), because we're about to embark on a journey that will not only illuminate the impact of education but also leave you feeling lighter than air... unless, of course, you're inhaling some of that Wisconsin smog.

[[RESULTS]]
Our rigorous statistical analysis revealed an eye-opening correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education and the level of air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin from 2012 to 2021. If we were any more astonished, we'd have to check our pulse to make sure we were still breathing, albeit in a non-polluted area.
The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 (not to toot our own horn, but it's pretty impressive) depicts the strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's like watching a beautiful symphony of data points, with the Master's degrees in Education on one end and the air pollution levels on the other, harmonizing in a statistical ballet that even Tchaikovsky would envy. Who knew that educational attainment and atmospheric quality could waltz so elegantly together?
The r-squared value of 0.6881601 emphasizes that a substantial 68.8% of the variation in air pollution levels in Appleton can be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in Education. In the grand scheme of statistical relationships, this is like finding a perfect matching pair of socks in a drawer full of mismatched ones – surprisingly rare and incredibly satisfying.
Now, for the moment you've all been waiting for – the p-value. Let's just say that the p-value is so small, it makes an atom look like King Kong. With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently assert that this correlation is not a statistical fluke; it's as real as the air you're breathing. Well, perhaps not as real if you're in Appleton, but you get the drift.
In conclusion, our results suggest that the pursuit of advanced degrees in Education may indeed have an impact on the ambient air quality in Appleton, Wisconsin. So, the next time someone tells you to "go educate yourself," you might want to consider doing it for the betterment of the air we all share. After all, who knew that education could not only enlighten minds but also clear the air?
Our findings open the door to a myriad of future investigations and interventions, and we can only hope that this study serves as a breath of fresh air for the field of education and environmental research. There you have it, folks – the unexpected, the illuminating, and the statistically significant connection between Master's degrees in Education and air pollution in Appleton. Keep on breathing, and keep on learning – the two may just go hand in hand more than we ever realized.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has revealed a surprising and statistically significant relationship between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the air pollution levels in Appleton, Wisconsin. It seems that the pursuit of knowledge is not just about expanding minds but also about clearing the air – quite literally!

Who would have thought that the academic pursuits of educators could have such an impact on the atmospheric ambiance of a city? It's like a real-life version of "The Fresh Prince of Air Pollution," where the education community swoops in to save the day, armed with diplomas and air purifiers.

Our findings not only emphasize the importance of education for intellectual enrichment but also highlight its potential role in environmental improvement. It's like hitting two birds with one stone, except in this case, we're enriching minds and cleansing the air instead of causing harm to innocent birds.

By demonstrating a correlation coefficient that could knock the wind out of you (figuratively speaking, of course), and a p-value so small, you'd need a microscope to see it, our study has truly breathed new life into the intersection of academic achievement and air quality. It's the kind of revelation that makes you want to throw your mortarboard in the air (just be sure to wash off the soot first).

So, as we wrap up this study, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. We've shed light on a connection that no one saw coming, and it's time for the academic community to bask in the glow of this groundbreaking revelation – for now, anyway. Who knows what other unexpected relationships are waiting to be unearthed? But for now, let's simply savor the sweet scent of this scientific victory.

And with that, we conclude our investigation, leaving the world with a little more knowledge and a little less pollution. It's a win-win situation that we can all breathe a sigh of relief about.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Environmental Education


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Environmental Education and Academic Analysis (CE3A)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breathing Degrees: The Relationship between Master's Degrees in Education and Air Pollution in Appleton's Ambience with an abstract of In this study, we set out to uncover the pivotal link between the attainment of Master's degrees in Education and the atmospheric quality in the delightful locale of Appleton, Wisconsin. While many may assume that the connection between advanced degrees in education and air pollution is as thin as the air in a smog-filled city, our findings may just blow your mind. Our research team meticulously crunched the numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Environmental Protection Agency, and what we discovered might leave you breathless. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8295542 and a p-value of less than 0.01 spanning from 2012 to 2021, our results indicate a strong and statistically significant relationship between the two variables. So, put on your thinking cap and take a deep breath as we dive into the surprising connections between education and environmental ambiance.

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees in Education, air pollution, atmospheric quality, correlation coefficient, p-value, National Center for Education Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency, relationship between education and environmental ambiance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Education
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Education
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Education

Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Appleton, WI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin

Correlation r = 0.8295542 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6881601 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Education) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.003. 0.0029896073043173720000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.3% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 334 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.42, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Education (Degrees awarded)179047164652154655146581145792145624146368146429146989153756
Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin (Bad air quality days)3.278690.2739730.82191800.57306600.2770080.5479450.5464480.826446




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([179047,164652,154655,146581,145792,145624,146368,146429,146989,153756,])
array_2 = np.array([3.27869,0.273973,0.821918,0,0.573066,0,0.277008,0.547945,0.546448,0.826446,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Education"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 4788 · Black Variable ID: 1319 · Red Variable ID: 20276
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0