about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,770 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme and the second variable is Google searches for 'numberphile'.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The 'i don't always' meme led to a surge in Internet traffic, thereby inadvertently promoting an interest in mathematical concepts and prompting people to seek out Numberphile for mind-bending number facts. It's a prime example of meme-athematics at work!

Create a meme inspired by the i dont always meme that in some way references Google searches for 'numberphile'. Try to emulate the style of the meme - don’t violate the copyright, just make it look and feel like the original meme.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme positively influenced numberphile (Google searches for 'numberphile'). Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile': The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'

The Journal of Internet Meme Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme and Google searches for 'numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile'": The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we harnessed the power of internet culture and data analytics to explore the connection between the viral 'i don't always' meme and online interest in 'Numberphile'. Leveraging Google Trends data from 2006 to 2023, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding light on the intricate web of internet humor and curiosity. While the famous Dos Equis spokesman may not have explicitly endorsed mathematical explorations, our results hint at a curious link between his enigmatic proclamations and the quest for numerical knowledge. This investigation reinforces the notion that internet memes, like a good dose of humor, have the power to engage and inspire interest in unexpected domains, leaving researchers with perhaps more questions than answers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme and Google searches for 'numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile'": The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we harnessed the power of internet culture and data analytics to explore the connection between the viral 'i don't always' meme and online interest in 'Numberphile'. Leveraging Google Trends data from 2006 to 2023, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding light on the intricate web of internet humor and curiosity. While the famous Dos Equis spokesman may not have explicitly endorsed mathematical explorations, our results hint at a curious link between his enigmatic proclamations and the quest for numerical knowledge. This investigation reinforces the notion that internet memes, like a good dose of humor, have the power to engage and inspire interest in unexpected domains, leaving researchers with perhaps more questions than answers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between internet memes and societal trends has become a subject of burgeoning interest in recent years. With the ever-evolving landscape of online culture, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries behind the virality and impact of these digital phenomena. In this study, we delve into the enigmatic realm of internet memes, focusing specifically on the 'i don't always' meme, and explore its potential connection to online searches for 'Numberphile'. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate entities has led to intriguing speculation, prompting us to embark on this investigative endeavor.

The 'i don't always' meme, popularized by its humorous and often absurd captions overlaid on the image of the suave Dos Equis spokesman, has permeated the digital sphere with its witty and relatable musings. Meanwhile, the curiosity-inducing 'Numberphile' channel on YouTube has garnered a dedicated following seeking to unravel the mysteries of mathematics. Our research aims to untangle the web of correlations between the propagation of this meme and the intellectual quest for numerical enlightenment, and to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful intersection between the two.

While one might initially assume that the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' exist in disparate spaces within the digital realm, our preliminary observations hint at a potential connection that piques the curiosity of both internet enthusiasts and researchers alike. As we embark on this quest for understanding, we anticipate uncovering insights that traverse the boundaries of humor and intellectual curiosity, helping to illuminate the intricate ways in which internet culture and scholarly pursuits intertwine.

In the following sections, we elaborate on the methodology employed in our investigation, present the empirical findings derived from our data analysis, and discuss the implications of our discoveries. Through this rigorous exploration, we aim to contribute to the understanding of the deeper workings of internet culture and its impact on knowledge dissemination and engagement. So, grab your metaphorical magnifying glass and join us on this journey through the interconnected realms of memes and mathematical curiosity! We promise it'll be a "meme-orable" experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme and Google searches for 'numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile'": The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we harnessed the power of internet culture and data analytics to explore the connection between the viral 'i don't always' meme and online interest in 'Numberphile'. Leveraging Google Trends data from 2006 to 2023, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding light on the intricate web of internet humor and curiosity. While the famous Dos Equis spokesman may not have explicitly endorsed mathematical explorations, our results hint at a curious link between his enigmatic proclamations and the quest for numerical knowledge. This investigation reinforces the notion that internet memes, like a good dose of humor, have the power to engage and inspire interest in unexpected domains, leaving researchers with perhaps more questions than answers.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between internet memes and societal trends has become a subject of burgeoning interest in recent years. With the ever-evolving landscape of online culture, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries behind the virality and impact of these digital phenomena. In this study, we delve into the enigmatic realm of internet memes, focusing specifically on the 'i don't always' meme, and explore its potential connection to online searches for 'Numberphile'. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate entities has led to intriguing speculation, prompting us to embark on this investigative endeavor.
The 'i don't always' meme, popularized by its humorous and often absurd captions overlaid on the image of the suave Dos Equis spokesman, has permeated the digital sphere with its witty and relatable musings. Meanwhile, the curiosity-inducing 'Numberphile' channel on YouTube has garnered a dedicated following seeking to unravel the mysteries of mathematics. Our research aims to untangle the web of correlations between the propagation of this meme and the intellectual quest for numerical enlightenment, and to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful intersection between the two.
While one might initially assume that the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' exist in disparate spaces within the digital realm, our preliminary observations hint at a potential connection that piques the curiosity of both internet enthusiasts and researchers alike. As we embark on this quest for understanding, we anticipate uncovering insights that traverse the boundaries of humor and intellectual curiosity, helping to illuminate the intricate ways in which internet culture and scholarly pursuits intertwine.
In the following sections, we elaborate on the methodology employed in our investigation, present the empirical findings derived from our data analysis, and discuss the implications of our discoveries. Through this rigorous exploration, we aim to contribute to the understanding of the deeper workings of internet culture and its impact on knowledge dissemination and engagement. So, grab your metaphorical magnifying glass and join us on this journey through the interconnected realms of memes and mathematical curiosity! We promise it'll be a "meme-orable" experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To contextualize our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the 'i don't always' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile', we begin our literature review with a survey of relevant scholarly studies. Smith and Doe (2016) conducted a rigorous analysis of internet memes and their impact on online search behavior, noting that memes have the potential to influence user engagement with varied content. In a similar vein, Jones (2018) explored the interconnected nature of digital humor and intellectual pursuits, shedding light on the subtle ways in which seemingly unrelated online phenomena can intersect.

Transitioning to the broader landscape of cultural phenomena, "Viral Cultures: How Memes, Kittens, and Emojis are Rewiring Our World" by Johnson (2019) offers a comprehensive examination of the societal impact of internet memes, albeit without a direct focus on mathematical inquiries. On the other hand, "The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number" by Livio (2002) provides insights into the allure of mathematical concepts, which could potentially intersect with the audience of 'Numberphile' and the ethos of the 'i don't always' meme.

Expanding our purview beyond academic literature, let us reflect on the fictional realm for a moment. In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Adams (1979), the enigmatic and humorously philosophical nature of the 'i don't always' meme finds a semblance of kinship with the whimsical musings encountered in the pursuit of knowledge. Furthermore, the juxtaposition of absurdity and intellectual curiosity in "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Carroll (1865) bears an uncanny resemblance to the inherent duality of the 'i don't always' meme and the scholarly endeavors of 'Numberphile' enthusiasts.

Moreover, in our perusal of digital archives and social media discourse, a tweet by @Memelord42 surfaces, provocatively musing, "What if the Dos Equis guy was secretly a math buff? #ConspiracyTheory #Numberphile". While the authenticity and veracity of such conjectures remain dubious, the tweet serves as a poignant reminder of the imaginative tangents that emerge in the cultural discourse surrounding memes and their unforeseen connections.

In wrapping up this literature review, we acknowledge the nuanced and multifaceted cultural phenomena at play, intertwined with the humor and intellectual pursuits that characterize both the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile'. These explorations set the stage for our empirical investigation, where we delve into the quantitative underpinnings of the perceived correlation between these digital domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme and Google searches for 'numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends . You used data from 2006 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile'": The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we harnessed the power of internet culture and data analytics to explore the connection between the viral 'i don't always' meme and online interest in 'Numberphile'. Leveraging Google Trends data from 2006 to 2023, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding light on the intricate web of internet humor and curiosity. While the famous Dos Equis spokesman may not have explicitly endorsed mathematical explorations, our results hint at a curious link between his enigmatic proclamations and the quest for numerical knowledge. This investigation reinforces the notion that internet memes, like a good dose of humor, have the power to engage and inspire interest in unexpected domains, leaving researchers with perhaps more questions than answers.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between internet memes and societal trends has become a subject of burgeoning interest in recent years. With the ever-evolving landscape of online culture, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries behind the virality and impact of these digital phenomena. In this study, we delve into the enigmatic realm of internet memes, focusing specifically on the 'i don't always' meme, and explore its potential connection to online searches for 'Numberphile'. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate entities has led to intriguing speculation, prompting us to embark on this investigative endeavor.
The 'i don't always' meme, popularized by its humorous and often absurd captions overlaid on the image of the suave Dos Equis spokesman, has permeated the digital sphere with its witty and relatable musings. Meanwhile, the curiosity-inducing 'Numberphile' channel on YouTube has garnered a dedicated following seeking to unravel the mysteries of mathematics. Our research aims to untangle the web of correlations between the propagation of this meme and the intellectual quest for numerical enlightenment, and to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful intersection between the two.
While one might initially assume that the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' exist in disparate spaces within the digital realm, our preliminary observations hint at a potential connection that piques the curiosity of both internet enthusiasts and researchers alike. As we embark on this quest for understanding, we anticipate uncovering insights that traverse the boundaries of humor and intellectual curiosity, helping to illuminate the intricate ways in which internet culture and scholarly pursuits intertwine.
In the following sections, we elaborate on the methodology employed in our investigation, present the empirical findings derived from our data analysis, and discuss the implications of our discoveries. Through this rigorous exploration, we aim to contribute to the understanding of the deeper workings of internet culture and its impact on knowledge dissemination and engagement. So, grab your metaphorical magnifying glass and join us on this journey through the interconnected realms of memes and mathematical curiosity! We promise it'll be a "meme-orable" experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The primary aim of this study was to scrutinize the correlation between the 'i don't always' meme's popularity and the frequency of Google searches for 'Numberphile'. Leveraging the vast expanse of the internet, we utilized Google Trends as our primary data source due to its comprehensive coverage of search queries. The data spanned from 2006 to 2023, encompassing a wide spectrum of internet trends and inquiries. Our team performed rigorous data collection and cleaning procedures, ensuring that the datasets were devoid of any extraneous noise or spurious fluctuations. Despite the digital ocean of data, we treaded carefully to sift through the myriad of internet musings to extract the essence of our research inquiry.

Correlation Analysis:
To untangle the multifaceted relationship between the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' searches, we harnessed the prowess of statistical analyses. Through the implementation of complex algorithms and mathematical computations, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the two variables. Employing nuances of cross-correlation functions and time-series analysis, we endeavored to unveil the hidden patterns and latent connections that underpin the perplexing interplay of internet memes and mathematical curiosity. With bated breath and caffeinated determination, we delved into the depths of statistical software, allowing it to crunch numbers and reveal the empirical bond between these seemingly unrelated domains.

Statistical Significance:
In our pursuit of scientific rigor, we sternly scrutinized the statistical significance of the observed correlation. Employing hypothesis testing and bootstrapping techniques, we aimed to ascertain the veracity of our findings. Our quest for a p-value less than 0.01 led us down the winding road of confidence intervals and probability distributions, culminating in a statistical verdict that tantalizingly affirmed the substantial association between the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' searches. As we immersed ourselves in the statistical nitty-gritty, the interplay of humor and mathematics danced before our very eyes, evoking both awe and chuckles in equal measure.

Robustness Checks:
To fortify the validity of our results, we conducted a battery of robustness checks and sensitivity analyses. From bootstrapping the data to conducting Monte Carlo simulations, we subjected our findings to a battery of challenges, much like a knight dueling with statistical uncertainties. Our intention was steadfast – to ensure that the knightly correlation we unearthed was not merely a mirage in the digital desert, but a steadfast bond forged in the crucible of internet humor and intellectual curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme and Google searches for 'numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and Google Trends .

For the time period 2006 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9412246, r-squared of 0.8859037, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile'": The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we harnessed the power of internet culture and data analytics to explore the connection between the viral 'i don't always' meme and online interest in 'Numberphile'. Leveraging Google Trends data from 2006 to 2023, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding light on the intricate web of internet humor and curiosity. While the famous Dos Equis spokesman may not have explicitly endorsed mathematical explorations, our results hint at a curious link between his enigmatic proclamations and the quest for numerical knowledge. This investigation reinforces the notion that internet memes, like a good dose of humor, have the power to engage and inspire interest in unexpected domains, leaving researchers with perhaps more questions than answers.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between internet memes and societal trends has become a subject of burgeoning interest in recent years. With the ever-evolving landscape of online culture, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries behind the virality and impact of these digital phenomena. In this study, we delve into the enigmatic realm of internet memes, focusing specifically on the 'i don't always' meme, and explore its potential connection to online searches for 'Numberphile'. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate entities has led to intriguing speculation, prompting us to embark on this investigative endeavor.
The 'i don't always' meme, popularized by its humorous and often absurd captions overlaid on the image of the suave Dos Equis spokesman, has permeated the digital sphere with its witty and relatable musings. Meanwhile, the curiosity-inducing 'Numberphile' channel on YouTube has garnered a dedicated following seeking to unravel the mysteries of mathematics. Our research aims to untangle the web of correlations between the propagation of this meme and the intellectual quest for numerical enlightenment, and to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful intersection between the two.
While one might initially assume that the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' exist in disparate spaces within the digital realm, our preliminary observations hint at a potential connection that piques the curiosity of both internet enthusiasts and researchers alike. As we embark on this quest for understanding, we anticipate uncovering insights that traverse the boundaries of humor and intellectual curiosity, helping to illuminate the intricate ways in which internet culture and scholarly pursuits intertwine.
In the following sections, we elaborate on the methodology employed in our investigation, present the empirical findings derived from our data analysis, and discuss the implications of our discoveries. Through this rigorous exploration, we aim to contribute to the understanding of the deeper workings of internet culture and its impact on knowledge dissemination and engagement. So, grab your metaphorical magnifying glass and join us on this journey through the interconnected realms of memes and mathematical curiosity! We promise it'll be a "meme-orable" experience.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our study revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the 'i don't always' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile' over the period from 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 indicates a highly significant association (p < 0.01) between the two variables, while the r-squared value of 0.8859037 suggests that approximately 88.59% of the variability in 'Numberphile' searches can be explained by the variability in the prevalence of the 'i don't always' meme. These findings provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between internet meme trends and intellectual pursuits, shedding light on the interconnectedness of online humor and educational curiosity.

Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' searches. The plot demonstrates a clear pattern, with an upward trend suggesting a simultaneous increase in the popularity of the meme and the level of interest in mathematical content, as represented by searches for 'Numberphile'. It's almost as if the Dos Equis spokesman's enigmatic statements are enticing individuals to seek out mathematical enlightenment, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can share a common thread in the vast tapestry of internet culture.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of mere statistical numbers. This connection between a popular meme and academic curiosity hints at the potential influence of humor on intellectual exploration, challenging the traditional boundaries of online entertainment and educational content. The Dos Equis spokesman may have never explicitly mentioned the wonders of number theory, but our results suggest that his cryptic declarations may have inadvertently sparked an interest in mathematical investigations among internet users. As we unravel the intricate dynamics at play, we are reminded of the sheer unpredictability and whimsy of internet culture, where even the most frivolous of memes can sow the seeds of intellectual inquisitiveness.

Our investigation highlights the symbiotic relationship between humor and knowledge-seeking behaviors, underscoring the multifaceted impact of internet memes on digital engagement. The unlikely correlation we have uncovered serves as a testament to the captivating interplay between seemingly unrelated facets of online discourse, leaving us to marvel at the serendipitous connections that emerge in the ever-evolving landscape of internet culture. Indeed, the Dos Equis spokesman's "most interesting man in the world" persona may have unwittingly also become the unofficial ambassador for mathematical fascination. This discovery fuels our enthusiasm to delve deeper into the whimsical world of internet phenomena and their unforeseen consequences, urging us to approach our research endeavors with a healthy dose of humor and an open mind.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme and Google searches for 'numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile'": The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we harnessed the power of internet culture and data analytics to explore the connection between the viral 'i don't always' meme and online interest in 'Numberphile'. Leveraging Google Trends data from 2006 to 2023, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding light on the intricate web of internet humor and curiosity. While the famous Dos Equis spokesman may not have explicitly endorsed mathematical explorations, our results hint at a curious link between his enigmatic proclamations and the quest for numerical knowledge. This investigation reinforces the notion that internet memes, like a good dose of humor, have the power to engage and inspire interest in unexpected domains, leaving researchers with perhaps more questions than answers.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the 'i don't always' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile', we begin our literature review with a survey of relevant scholarly studies. Smith and Doe (2016) conducted a rigorous analysis of internet memes and their impact on online search behavior, noting that memes have the potential to influence user engagement with varied content. In a similar vein, Jones (2018) explored the interconnected nature of digital humor and intellectual pursuits, shedding light on the subtle ways in which seemingly unrelated online phenomena can intersect.
Transitioning to the broader landscape of cultural phenomena, "Viral Cultures: How Memes, Kittens, and Emojis are Rewiring Our World" by Johnson (2019) offers a comprehensive examination of the societal impact of internet memes, albeit without a direct focus on mathematical inquiries. On the other hand, "The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number" by Livio (2002) provides insights into the allure of mathematical concepts, which could potentially intersect with the audience of 'Numberphile' and the ethos of the 'i don't always' meme.
Expanding our purview beyond academic literature, let us reflect on the fictional realm for a moment. In "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Adams (1979), the enigmatic and humorously philosophical nature of the 'i don't always' meme finds a semblance of kinship with the whimsical musings encountered in the pursuit of knowledge. Furthermore, the juxtaposition of absurdity and intellectual curiosity in "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" by Carroll (1865) bears an uncanny resemblance to the inherent duality of the 'i don't always' meme and the scholarly endeavors of 'Numberphile' enthusiasts.
Moreover, in our perusal of digital archives and social media discourse, a tweet by @Memelord42 surfaces, provocatively musing, "What if the Dos Equis guy was secretly a math buff? #ConspiracyTheory #Numberphile". While the authenticity and veracity of such conjectures remain dubious, the tweet serves as a poignant reminder of the imaginative tangents that emerge in the cultural discourse surrounding memes and their unforeseen connections.
In wrapping up this literature review, we acknowledge the nuanced and multifaceted cultural phenomena at play, intertwined with the humor and intellectual pursuits that characterize both the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile'. These explorations set the stage for our empirical investigation, where we delve into the quantitative underpinnings of the perceived correlation between these digital domains.

[[RESULTS]]
Our study revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the 'i don't always' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile' over the period from 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 indicates a highly significant association (p < 0.01) between the two variables, while the r-squared value of 0.8859037 suggests that approximately 88.59% of the variability in 'Numberphile' searches can be explained by the variability in the prevalence of the 'i don't always' meme. These findings provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between internet meme trends and intellectual pursuits, shedding light on the interconnectedness of online humor and educational curiosity.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' searches. The plot demonstrates a clear pattern, with an upward trend suggesting a simultaneous increase in the popularity of the meme and the level of interest in mathematical content, as represented by searches for 'Numberphile'. It's almost as if the Dos Equis spokesman's enigmatic statements are enticing individuals to seek out mathematical enlightenment, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can share a common thread in the vast tapestry of internet culture.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of mere statistical numbers. This connection between a popular meme and academic curiosity hints at the potential influence of humor on intellectual exploration, challenging the traditional boundaries of online entertainment and educational content. The Dos Equis spokesman may have never explicitly mentioned the wonders of number theory, but our results suggest that his cryptic declarations may have inadvertently sparked an interest in mathematical investigations among internet users. As we unravel the intricate dynamics at play, we are reminded of the sheer unpredictability and whimsy of internet culture, where even the most frivolous of memes can sow the seeds of intellectual inquisitiveness.
Our investigation highlights the symbiotic relationship between humor and knowledge-seeking behaviors, underscoring the multifaceted impact of internet memes on digital engagement. The unlikely correlation we have uncovered serves as a testament to the captivating interplay between seemingly unrelated facets of online discourse, leaving us to marvel at the serendipitous connections that emerge in the ever-evolving landscape of internet culture. Indeed, the Dos Equis spokesman's "most interesting man in the world" persona may have unwittingly also become the unofficial ambassador for mathematical fascination. This discovery fuels our enthusiasm to delve deeper into the whimsical world of internet phenomena and their unforeseen consequences, urging us to approach our research endeavors with a healthy dose of humor and an open mind.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide compelling evidence for a strong positive correlation between the popularity of the 'i don't always' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile', underscoring the intriguing interconnectedness of internet humor and intellectual pursuits. Our findings corroborate prior research by Smith and Doe (2016), as well as Jones (2018), who hinted at the potential influence of memes on user engagement with diverse content. Moreover, the whimsical musings encountered in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Adams (1979) parallel the enigmatic nature of the 'i don't always' meme, reinforcing the notion that seemingly disparate phenomena can intersect in unexpected ways. The serendipitous relationship we have uncovered between a viral meme and academic curiosity sparks a playful sense of wonder, reminiscent of the imaginative tangents ubiquitous in online cultural discourse.

Beyond the statistical realm, our results hint at the Dos Equis spokesman's inadvertent role as an ambassador for mathematical fascination, sparking an interest in number theory among internet users. While Dos Equis may not overtly endorse mathematical inquiries, it appears that the perplexing allure of his proclamations has led individuals to seek out numerical enlightenment, lending a touch of whimsy to the pursuit of scholastic stimulation. It seems that the Dos Equis spokesman's "most interesting man in the world" persona has taken on a new dimension, becoming an unlikely advocate for intellectual curiosity.

This investigation highlights the unpredictability and whimsy of internet culture, where even the most frivolous of memes can sow the seeds of intellectual inquisitiveness. The unexpected correlation we have uncovered between a popular meme and academic curiosity reinforces the notion that online entertainment and educational content are not mutually exclusive, hinting at the potential influence of humor on knowledge-seeking behavior. Thus, our research endeavors have been imbued with a healthy dose of humor and an open mind, as we navigate the ever-evolving landscape of internet culture and its unforeseen consequences.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme and Google searches for 'numberphile'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile'": The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we harnessed the power of internet culture and data analytics to explore the connection between the viral 'i don't always' meme and online interest in 'Numberphile'. Leveraging Google Trends data from 2006 to 2023, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding light on the intricate web of internet humor and curiosity. While the famous Dos Equis spokesman may not have explicitly endorsed mathematical explorations, our results hint at a curious link between his enigmatic proclamations and the quest for numerical knowledge. This investigation reinforces the notion that internet memes, like a good dose of humor, have the power to engage and inspire interest in unexpected domains, leaving researchers with perhaps more questions than answers.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between internet memes and societal trends has become a subject of burgeoning interest in recent years. With the ever-evolving landscape of online culture, researchers have sought to unravel the mysteries behind the virality and impact of these digital phenomena. In this study, we delve into the enigmatic realm of internet memes, focusing specifically on the 'i don't always' meme, and explore its potential connection to online searches for 'Numberphile'. The juxtaposition of these two seemingly disparate entities has led to intriguing speculation, prompting us to embark on this investigative endeavor.
The 'i don't always' meme, popularized by its humorous and often absurd captions overlaid on the image of the suave Dos Equis spokesman, has permeated the digital sphere with its witty and relatable musings. Meanwhile, the curiosity-inducing 'Numberphile' channel on YouTube has garnered a dedicated following seeking to unravel the mysteries of mathematics. Our research aims to untangle the web of correlations between the propagation of this meme and the intellectual quest for numerical enlightenment, and to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful intersection between the two.
While one might initially assume that the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' exist in disparate spaces within the digital realm, our preliminary observations hint at a potential connection that piques the curiosity of both internet enthusiasts and researchers alike. As we embark on this quest for understanding, we anticipate uncovering insights that traverse the boundaries of humor and intellectual curiosity, helping to illuminate the intricate ways in which internet culture and scholarly pursuits intertwine.
In the following sections, we elaborate on the methodology employed in our investigation, present the empirical findings derived from our data analysis, and discuss the implications of our discoveries. Through this rigorous exploration, we aim to contribute to the understanding of the deeper workings of internet culture and its impact on knowledge dissemination and engagement. So, grab your metaphorical magnifying glass and join us on this journey through the interconnected realms of memes and mathematical curiosity! We promise it'll be a "meme-orable" experience.

[[RESULTS]]
Our study revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between the popularity of the 'i don't always' meme and Google searches for 'Numberphile' over the period from 2006 to 2023. The correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 indicates a highly significant association (p < 0.01) between the two variables, while the r-squared value of 0.8859037 suggests that approximately 88.59% of the variability in 'Numberphile' searches can be explained by the variability in the prevalence of the 'i don't always' meme. These findings provide compelling evidence for an intriguing relationship between internet meme trends and intellectual pursuits, shedding light on the interconnectedness of online humor and educational curiosity.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' searches. The plot demonstrates a clear pattern, with an upward trend suggesting a simultaneous increase in the popularity of the meme and the level of interest in mathematical content, as represented by searches for 'Numberphile'. It's almost as if the Dos Equis spokesman's enigmatic statements are enticing individuals to seek out mathematical enlightenment, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can share a common thread in the vast tapestry of internet culture.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of mere statistical numbers. This connection between a popular meme and academic curiosity hints at the potential influence of humor on intellectual exploration, challenging the traditional boundaries of online entertainment and educational content. The Dos Equis spokesman may have never explicitly mentioned the wonders of number theory, but our results suggest that his cryptic declarations may have inadvertently sparked an interest in mathematical investigations among internet users. As we unravel the intricate dynamics at play, we are reminded of the sheer unpredictability and whimsy of internet culture, where even the most frivolous of memes can sow the seeds of intellectual inquisitiveness.
Our investigation highlights the symbiotic relationship between humor and knowledge-seeking behaviors, underscoring the multifaceted impact of internet memes on digital engagement. The unlikely correlation we have uncovered serves as a testament to the captivating interplay between seemingly unrelated facets of online discourse, leaving us to marvel at the serendipitous connections that emerge in the ever-evolving landscape of internet culture. Indeed, the Dos Equis spokesman's "most interesting man in the world" persona may have unwittingly also become the unofficial ambassador for mathematical fascination. This discovery fuels our enthusiasm to delve deeper into the whimsical world of internet phenomena and their unforeseen consequences, urging us to approach our research endeavors with a healthy dose of humor and an open mind.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation unveils a compelling correlation between the meteoric rise of the 'i don't always' meme and the burgeoning interest in 'Numberphile', indicating a noteworthy interplay between internet humor and intellectual curiosity. The robust statistical evidence we have amassed reinforces the idea that seemingly unrelated digital phenomena can coalesce in unexpected ways, akin to the fusion of unassuming elements in a whimsical chemical reaction. Our findings underscore the influence of online humor on the pursuit of knowledge, prompting a reevaluation of the traditional demarcations between leisurely entertainment and scholarly exploration.

The insights gleaned from this study not only illuminate the captivating dance of internet memes and academic inquisitiveness but also underscore the need for interdisciplinary perspectives in unraveling the mysteries of online culture. As we bid adieu to this particular avenue of inquiry, buoyed by the revelatory discoveries we have made, we are reminded of the ever-rippling effects of internet phenomena and the uncontainable nature of intellectual contagion. The Dos Equis spokesman's suave declarations, once confined to mere entertainment, now linger in the digital ether as inadvertent catalysts for mathematical wonderment, exemplifying the whimsy of internet culture.

It is with a sense of fulfillment and a dash of wonder that we cautiously declare that no further research is necessary in this particular domain, accepting that even the most improbable of connections can hold valuable insights. And with that, we leave the 'i don't always' meme and 'Numberphile' to continue their peculiar tête-à-tête in the annals of internet lore, forever intertwined in the digital landscape as a testament to the peculiar and unpredictable nature of viral phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile': The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Internet Meme Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile': The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association of Internet Culture Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled I Don't Always Research Internet Memes, but When I Do, I Google 'Numberphile': The Correlation Between the Popularity of the 'i don't always' Meme and Google Searches for 'Numberphile' with an abstract of In this study, we harnessed the power of internet culture and data analytics to explore the connection between the viral 'i don't always' meme and online interest in 'Numberphile'. Leveraging Google Trends data from 2006 to 2023, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9412246 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena, shedding light on the intricate web of internet humor and curiosity. While the famous Dos Equis spokesman may not have explicitly endorsed mathematical explorations, our results hint at a curious link between his enigmatic proclamations and the quest for numerical knowledge. This investigation reinforces the notion that internet memes, like a good dose of humor, have the power to engage and inspire interest in unexpected domains, leaving researchers with perhaps more questions than answers.

ChatGPT:

'i don't always', meme, Numberphile, Google Trends data, correlation coefficient, p-value, internet culture, data analytics, Dos Equis spokesman, mathematical explorations, internet humor, curiosity, viral meme

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i dont always meme' (without quotes, in the United States)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.

See what else correlates with Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme

Google searches for 'numberphile'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'numberphile' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'numberphile'

Correlation r = 0.9412246 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8859037 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'numberphile') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme) over the 18 years from 2006 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.0E-9. 0.0000000059500176194028880000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 6.0E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 168,066,729 random variables You don't actually need 168 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme (Relative popularity)7.083333.52.545453.555563.89.8181838.833358.2553.083362.083350.583337.833331.666731.2522.2514.514.666711.5
Google searches for 'numberphile' (Rel. search volume)12.166672.166670.6666670.5833330.2522.2547.2565.333359.083349.7548.753738.916729.666716.666717.416712.4444




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7.08333,3.5,2.54545,3.55556,3.8,9.81818,38.8333,58.25,53.0833,62.0833,50.5833,37.8333,31.6667,31.25,22.25,14.5,14.6667,11.5,])
array_2 = np.array([1,2.16667,2.16667,0.666667,0.583333,0.25,22.25,47.25,65.3333,59.0833,49.75,48.75,37,38.9167,29.6667,16.6667,17.4167,12.4444,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the 'i dont always' meme"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'numberphile'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 5770 · Black Variable ID: 25150 · Red Variable ID: 1491
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0