about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,838 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and the second variable is Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Nicolas Cage's on-screen presence grew, so did the desire for a truly independent choice, leading Georgians to vote for the Libertarian candidate in hopes of experiencing a National Treasure of a leader who could Face/Off against conventional politics, Con Air their way to smaller government, and perhaps even leave behind a Ghost Rider legacy of individual freedoms. Cage's cinematic prolificness may have ignited a Leaving Las Vegas effect on voters, driving them to seek a Adaptation of the status quo, and ultimately, to declare their declaration of independence at the polls. It seems that in this case, the Cagelier the choice, the more it Con Air-inspiringly led to a desire for political Face/Off... or maybe, just maybe, it's all a part of the Cage's master plan to one day play the lead role in "The Rock: Presidential Edition".

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a bustling theater. Rows of Nicolas Cage movie posters line the walls, each one representing the number of movies he's appeared in. Across the street, a line of voters snakes its way into a polling station in Georgia, where a prominent Libertarian candidate's poster boldly stands. The excited chatter suggests that as Cage's extensive filmography captures the audience's attention, the political buzz about voting for the Libertarian candidate in search of a National Treasure of a leader grows louder, sparked by the desire to Face/Off against traditional politics. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Magic realism High-tech Psychedelic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia, in the following situation: As Nicolas Cage's on-screen presence grew, so did the desire for a truly independent choice, leading Georgians to vote for the Libertarian candidate in hopes of experiencing a National Treasure of a leader who could Face/Off against conventional politics, Con Air their way to smaller government, and perhaps even leave behind a Ghost Rider legacy of individual freedoms. Cage's cinematic prolificness may have ignited a Leaving Las Vegas effect on voters, driving them to seek a Adaptation of the status quo, and ultimately, to declare their declaration of independence at the polls. It seems that in this case, the Cagelier the choice, the more it Con Air-inspiringly led to a desire for political Face/Off... or maybe, just maybe, it's all a part of the Cage's master plan to one day play the lead role in "The Rock: Presidential Edition".. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling theater, rows of Nicolas Cage movie posters line the walls, each one representing the number of movies he's appeared in. Meanwhile, across the street, a line of voters snakes its way into a polling station in Georgia, where a prominent Libertarian candidate's poster boldly stands. The excited chatter suggests that as Cage's extensive filmography captures the audience's attention, the political buzz about voting for the Libertarian candidate in search of a National Treasure of a leader grows louder, sparked by the desire to Face/Off against traditional politics.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling theater, rows of Nicolas Cage movie posters line the walls, each one representing the number of movies he's appeared in. Meanwhile, across the street, a line of voters snakes its way into a polling station in Georgia, where a prominent Libertarian candidate's poster boldly stands. The excited chatter suggests that as Cage's extensive filmography captures the audience's attention, the political buzz about voting for the Libertarian candidate in search of a National Treasure of a leader grows louder, sparked by the desire to Face/Off against traditional politics. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a bustling theater. Rows of Nicolas Cage movie posters line the walls, each one representing the number of movies he's appeared in. Across the street, a line of voters snakes its way into a polling station in Georgia, where a prominent Libertarian candidate's poster boldly stands. The excited chatter suggests that as Cage's extensive filmography captures the audience's attention, the political buzz about voting for the Libertarian candidate in search of a National Treasure of a leader grows louder, sparked by the desire to Face/Off against traditional politics.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in caused Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia

The Journal of Cinematic Political Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we investigate the intriguing relationship between the number of movies featuring the iconic Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. Using data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1980 to 2020. Our findings reveal a remarkably high positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence and Libertarian support in Georgia.

It appears that the "Cage Effect" extends beyond the silver screen and into the realm of political preferences, prompting us to ponder the profound question: "Are voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's influence?" This unexpected association uncages new avenues for discourse on celebrity influence and electoral behavior, shedding light on the peculiar interplay between pop culture and politics.

As we unravel the enigma of Cage's cinematic charisma intertwined with political leanings, it becomes evident that his cinematic ventures may be more than mere entertainment – they could be a driving force behind electoral choices. As the popular saying goes, "When it comes to elections, it's not the 'Face/Off,' but the Cage effect that counts."



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we investigate the intriguing relationship between the number of movies featuring the iconic Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. Using data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1980 to 2020. Our findings reveal a remarkably high positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence and Libertarian support in Georgia.

It appears that the "Cage Effect" extends beyond the silver screen and into the realm of political preferences, prompting us to ponder the profound question: "Are voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's influence?" This unexpected association uncages new avenues for discourse on celebrity influence and electoral behavior, shedding light on the peculiar interplay between pop culture and politics.

As we unravel the enigma of Cage's cinematic charisma intertwined with political leanings, it becomes evident that his cinematic ventures may be more than mere entertainment – they could be a driving force behind electoral choices. As the popular saying goes, "When it comes to elections, it's not the 'Face/Off,' but the Cage effect that counts."


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of electoral dynamics, factors influencing voters' decisions have long been the subject of rigorous scrutiny. Researchers have delved into demographics, socioeconomic conditions, and political ideologies, striving to discern the underlying determinants of voting patterns. Amidst this scholarly pursuit, a new, unexpected variable has emerged from the eclectic world of film and celebrity: Nicolas Cage. Yes, you read that right - the enigmatic actor has found himself entangled in the political landscape of Georgia, adding a twist to our understanding of electoral behaviors.

The connection between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia yields a curious and unexpected correlation. As we embark on this fascinating journey into the "Cage Effect," it behooves us to consider the profound implications of a Hollywood superstar's on-screen presence on the political consciousness of voters. It seems that for Georgia residents, the question may no longer be "What's in the wallet?" but rather, "What's in the Cage?"

The conventional wisdom in electoral studies might lead one to dismiss the influence of a flamboyant actor on voters' decisions, akin to the dismissal of a bee's abilities as un-bee-lievable. However, our analysis has uncovered a statistically significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, revealing a startling link between Cage's filmography and Libertarian votes in Georgia. The correlation is so strong that it's almost as if the more movies Cage stars in, the stronger the support for the Libertarian candidate, prompting us to wonder if voters are captivated by the "Cage Match" between Hollywood dazzle and political ideals.

This unexpected coalescence of the entertainment industry and political allegiances prompts us to consider an unconventional question: Are voters swayed by Cage's on-screen charisma to lean towards the Libertarian candidate, or are they simply seeking a "National Treasure" in the realm of political alternatives? As we delve into this uncharted territory, it becomes clear that the impact of Cage's cinematic presence on electoral preferences is no mere "Gone in 60 Seconds" kind of phenomenon but an intriguing spectacle worthy of scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we investigate the intriguing relationship between the number of movies featuring the iconic Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. Using data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1980 to 2020. Our findings reveal a remarkably high positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence and Libertarian support in Georgia.

It appears that the "Cage Effect" extends beyond the silver screen and into the realm of political preferences, prompting us to ponder the profound question: "Are voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's influence?" This unexpected association uncages new avenues for discourse on celebrity influence and electoral behavior, shedding light on the peculiar interplay between pop culture and politics.

As we unravel the enigma of Cage's cinematic charisma intertwined with political leanings, it becomes evident that his cinematic ventures may be more than mere entertainment – they could be a driving force behind electoral choices. As the popular saying goes, "When it comes to elections, it's not the 'Face/Off,' but the Cage effect that counts."


-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of electoral dynamics, factors influencing voters' decisions have long been the subject of rigorous scrutiny. Researchers have delved into demographics, socioeconomic conditions, and political ideologies, striving to discern the underlying determinants of voting patterns. Amidst this scholarly pursuit, a new, unexpected variable has emerged from the eclectic world of film and celebrity: Nicolas Cage. Yes, you read that right - the enigmatic actor has found himself entangled in the political landscape of Georgia, adding a twist to our understanding of electoral behaviors.
The connection between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia yields a curious and unexpected correlation. As we embark on this fascinating journey into the "Cage Effect," it behooves us to consider the profound implications of a Hollywood superstar's on-screen presence on the political consciousness of voters. It seems that for Georgia residents, the question may no longer be "What's in the wallet?" but rather, "What's in the Cage?"
The conventional wisdom in electoral studies might lead one to dismiss the influence of a flamboyant actor on voters' decisions, akin to the dismissal of a bee's abilities as un-bee-lievable. However, our analysis has uncovered a statistically significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, revealing a startling link between Cage's filmography and Libertarian votes in Georgia. The correlation is so strong that it's almost as if the more movies Cage stars in, the stronger the support for the Libertarian candidate, prompting us to wonder if voters are captivated by the "Cage Match" between Hollywood dazzle and political ideals.
This unexpected coalescence of the entertainment industry and political allegiances prompts us to consider an unconventional question: Are voters swayed by Cage's on-screen charisma to lean towards the Libertarian candidate, or are they simply seeking a "National Treasure" in the realm of political alternatives? As we delve into this uncharted territory, it becomes clear that the impact of Cage's cinematic presence on electoral preferences is no mere "Gone in 60 Seconds" kind of phenomenon but an intriguing spectacle worthy of scholarly investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2008) observed a positive correlation between celebrity endorsements and political perceptions, shedding light on the potential impact of pop culture icons on electoral choices. Similarly, Jones (2011) explored the intersection of media influence and voter behavior, emphasizing the potency of celebrity visibility in shaping political allegiances. These studies lay the groundwork for our investigation into the peculiar relationship between Nicolas Cage's filmography and the Libertarian votes in Georgia.

While traditional electoral studies have focused on more conventional influencers, such as party affiliations and policy platforms, our inquiry delves into uncharted territory where "Con Air" meets political fervor. The unexpected connection between Cage's cinematic endeavors and Libertarian support in Georgia raises fundamental questions about celebrity influence and its resonance with the electorate.

In "The Cage Conundrum" (2020), the authors posit a novel perspective, proposing that the "Cage Effect" transcends mere cinematic enjoyment, permeating the subconscious of voters and sparking an affinity for the unconventional. Drawing on theories of cognitive dissonance and symbolic interactionism, the study unveils the intricate web of associations between Cage's prolific on-screen presence and voter inclinations. This phenomenon prompts us to ponder, are the citizens of Georgia experiencing a "Raising Arizona" phenomenon, where Cage's cinematic magnetism elevates the appeal of Libertarian ideals?

As we navigate through this unorthodox investigation, it is crucial to consider the wider implications of celebrity influence, beyond the confines of political science alone. In "Celebrity Culture and Society" (2013), the authors delineate the far-reaching impact of celebrity endorsements on consumer behavior and societal norms, proffering a lens through which to comprehend the "Cage Effect" on political preferences. It appears that Cage's cinematic allure may be akin to a "Face/Off" endeavor, where the lines between entertainment and political disposition blur, much like his enigmatic characters' identities.

From the world of fiction, literary works such as Orwell's "1984" and Huxley's "Brave New World" offer allegorical parallels to our exploration of the Cage-Libertarian nexus. These dystopian narratives underscore the subliminal influence of media and entertainment on societal constructs, perhaps mirroring the captivating sway of Cage's cinematic repertoire on the political climate. It seems that for the voters in Georgia, the question may no longer be "Which presidential candidate?" but rather, "Who's watching Nicolas Cage movies?"

On a tangentially related note, it's worth mentioning that amidst the complexities of electoral dynamics and celebrity endorsements, the board game "Monopoly" presents an intriguing analogy. In this classic game of strategic acquisition, players' choices and financial gains are influenced by the properties they acquire and the cards they draw, reflecting the nuanced interplay between external stimuli and individual decisions. In a similar vein, the "Cage Effect" may function as a wildcard in the political domain, influencing voter choices in a manner that's as unpredictable as rolling the dice in a game of chance.

The interplay between Nicolas Cage's cinematic oeuvre and Libertarian votes in Georgia unveils a rich tapestry of improbable connections, inviting us to contemplate the profound implications of celebrity influence on the electoral landscape. In the realm of politics, it appears that Nicolas Cage's on-screen charisma may indeed hold the key to unlocking a new understanding of voter behaviors, prompting us to quip, "Just when you thought you'd seen it all, along comes the 'Cage Effect' to add a twist to the plot!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we investigate the intriguing relationship between the number of movies featuring the iconic Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. Using data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1980 to 2020. Our findings reveal a remarkably high positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence and Libertarian support in Georgia.

It appears that the "Cage Effect" extends beyond the silver screen and into the realm of political preferences, prompting us to ponder the profound question: "Are voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's influence?" This unexpected association uncages new avenues for discourse on celebrity influence and electoral behavior, shedding light on the peculiar interplay between pop culture and politics.

As we unravel the enigma of Cage's cinematic charisma intertwined with political leanings, it becomes evident that his cinematic ventures may be more than mere entertainment – they could be a driving force behind electoral choices. As the popular saying goes, "When it comes to elections, it's not the 'Face/Off,' but the Cage effect that counts."


[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of electoral dynamics, factors influencing voters' decisions have long been the subject of rigorous scrutiny. Researchers have delved into demographics, socioeconomic conditions, and political ideologies, striving to discern the underlying determinants of voting patterns. Amidst this scholarly pursuit, a new, unexpected variable has emerged from the eclectic world of film and celebrity: Nicolas Cage. Yes, you read that right - the enigmatic actor has found himself entangled in the political landscape of Georgia, adding a twist to our understanding of electoral behaviors.
The connection between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia yields a curious and unexpected correlation. As we embark on this fascinating journey into the "Cage Effect," it behooves us to consider the profound implications of a Hollywood superstar's on-screen presence on the political consciousness of voters. It seems that for Georgia residents, the question may no longer be "What's in the wallet?" but rather, "What's in the Cage?"
The conventional wisdom in electoral studies might lead one to dismiss the influence of a flamboyant actor on voters' decisions, akin to the dismissal of a bee's abilities as un-bee-lievable. However, our analysis has uncovered a statistically significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, revealing a startling link between Cage's filmography and Libertarian votes in Georgia. The correlation is so strong that it's almost as if the more movies Cage stars in, the stronger the support for the Libertarian candidate, prompting us to wonder if voters are captivated by the "Cage Match" between Hollywood dazzle and political ideals.
This unexpected coalescence of the entertainment industry and political allegiances prompts us to consider an unconventional question: Are voters swayed by Cage's on-screen charisma to lean towards the Libertarian candidate, or are they simply seeking a "National Treasure" in the realm of political alternatives? As we delve into this uncharted territory, it becomes clear that the impact of Cage's cinematic presence on electoral preferences is no mere "Gone in 60 Seconds" kind of phenomenon but an intriguing spectacle worthy of scholarly investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the enigmatic relationship between Nicolas Cage's cinematic output and the voting behavior of Georgia residents, we employed a multi-faceted methodological approach that combined quantitative analysis, data mining, and a touch of Hollywood glitz. First, we gathered data on the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage from The Movie DB, encompassing the period from 1980 to 2020. The inclusion criteria were stringent – only theatrical releases and widely recognized productions were considered, ensuring that the data captured the true essence of Cage's silver screen endeavors. As the saying goes, "Quality over 'quantity' – or, in this case, 'Cage'tity," if you will.

In parallel, we meticulously collated information on the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia from the MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse. The data retrieval process involved navigating through the labyrinthine corridors of electoral archives, akin to embarking on a treacherous treasure hunt in search of the perfect "National Treasure." After conquering the perils of data procurement, we rigorously examined the electoral numbers spanning the same timeframe as Cage's cinematic forays.

With these two datasets at our disposal, we employed robust statistical techniques to unveil the mesmerizing interplay between filmography and political preferences. Leveraging the power of correlation analysis, we sought to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian candidate in Georgia. Our statistical toolkit included Pearson's correlation coefficient, providing a measure of the linear dependence between these two seemingly incongruous variables.

Furthermore, we augmented our analysis with time-series methods to explore the dynamics of this unusual association over the decades. By unraveling the temporal evolution of the "Cage Effect," we endeavored to capture the nuanced shifts in electoral behavior vis-à-vis Cage's cinematic presence. The time-series analysis was particularly illuminating, akin to discovering hidden treasure amidst the script of a box office hit.

In addition to these quantitative analyses, we ventured into the realm of qualitative inquiry, delving into interviews and surveys to gauge the perceptions of Georgia residents regarding the influence of Cage's movies on their political inclinations. Here, we encountered a myriad of colorful responses – from staunch enthusiasts who fervently believed in the "Cage Magic" to skeptics who dismissed the entire notion as a "Wild at Heart" fantasy.

Lastly, we conducted a comprehensive literature review across fields as diverse as electoral studies, celebrity influence, and cinematic impact on social behavior. This expansive exploration provided a contextual backdrop for our investigation, shedding light on the intersection of celebrity persona and political comportment. The literature review was reminiscent of sifting through an eclectic film festival, where each scholarly work offered a unique perspective on the enigmatic "Cage Effect."

Through this eclectic blend of methodologies – from statistical wizardry to qualitative introspection – we endeavored to unravel the mystery of Nicolas Cage's cinematic sway over the electoral landscape of Georgia. In the words of the great actor himself, "I've been in a few films; 'Face/Off' comes to mind. But the real 'Cage Match' is understanding the complexities of politics – perhaps even more complex than the 'Con Air'."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9373380, r-squared of 0.8786025, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we investigate the intriguing relationship between the number of movies featuring the iconic Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. Using data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1980 to 2020. Our findings reveal a remarkably high positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence and Libertarian support in Georgia.

It appears that the "Cage Effect" extends beyond the silver screen and into the realm of political preferences, prompting us to ponder the profound question: "Are voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's influence?" This unexpected association uncages new avenues for discourse on celebrity influence and electoral behavior, shedding light on the peculiar interplay between pop culture and politics.

As we unravel the enigma of Cage's cinematic charisma intertwined with political leanings, it becomes evident that his cinematic ventures may be more than mere entertainment – they could be a driving force behind electoral choices. As the popular saying goes, "When it comes to elections, it's not the 'Face/Off,' but the Cage effect that counts."


-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of electoral dynamics, factors influencing voters' decisions have long been the subject of rigorous scrutiny. Researchers have delved into demographics, socioeconomic conditions, and political ideologies, striving to discern the underlying determinants of voting patterns. Amidst this scholarly pursuit, a new, unexpected variable has emerged from the eclectic world of film and celebrity: Nicolas Cage. Yes, you read that right - the enigmatic actor has found himself entangled in the political landscape of Georgia, adding a twist to our understanding of electoral behaviors.
The connection between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia yields a curious and unexpected correlation. As we embark on this fascinating journey into the "Cage Effect," it behooves us to consider the profound implications of a Hollywood superstar's on-screen presence on the political consciousness of voters. It seems that for Georgia residents, the question may no longer be "What's in the wallet?" but rather, "What's in the Cage?"
The conventional wisdom in electoral studies might lead one to dismiss the influence of a flamboyant actor on voters' decisions, akin to the dismissal of a bee's abilities as un-bee-lievable. However, our analysis has uncovered a statistically significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, revealing a startling link between Cage's filmography and Libertarian votes in Georgia. The correlation is so strong that it's almost as if the more movies Cage stars in, the stronger the support for the Libertarian candidate, prompting us to wonder if voters are captivated by the "Cage Match" between Hollywood dazzle and political ideals.
This unexpected coalescence of the entertainment industry and political allegiances prompts us to consider an unconventional question: Are voters swayed by Cage's on-screen charisma to lean towards the Libertarian candidate, or are they simply seeking a "National Treasure" in the realm of political alternatives? As we delve into this uncharted territory, it becomes clear that the impact of Cage's cinematic presence on electoral preferences is no mere "Gone in 60 Seconds" kind of phenomenon but an intriguing spectacle worthy of scholarly investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study revealed a compelling and statistically significant correlation between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9373380, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8786025, and a p-value less than 0.01, underscore the robustness of this association. It seems that in Georgia, the "Cage Effect" extends far beyond the spotlight, making us ponder whether voters are truly 'Facing the Facts' or simply fans of both liberty and Cage.

As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. Each data point seems to echo the sentiment, "When it comes to voting, there's no 'Cage' for error."

These findings not only add a curious dimension to the intersection of entertainment and politics, but they also beckon us to consider the broader implications of celebrity influence on electoral behaviors. The unexpected nexus between Cage's cinematic ventures and political proclivities opens the door to a myriad of questions, provoking further contemplation on the intricate interplay of pop culture and voting decisions.

In light of these results, it's evident that the "Cage Effect" is a force to be reckoned with in the realm of electoral dynamics, leaving us to ponder whether voters are truly "Gone in 60 Seconds" to cast their ballots in favor of the Libertarian candidate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we investigate the intriguing relationship between the number of movies featuring the iconic Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. Using data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1980 to 2020. Our findings reveal a remarkably high positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence and Libertarian support in Georgia.

It appears that the "Cage Effect" extends beyond the silver screen and into the realm of political preferences, prompting us to ponder the profound question: "Are voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's influence?" This unexpected association uncages new avenues for discourse on celebrity influence and electoral behavior, shedding light on the peculiar interplay between pop culture and politics.

As we unravel the enigma of Cage's cinematic charisma intertwined with political leanings, it becomes evident that his cinematic ventures may be more than mere entertainment – they could be a driving force behind electoral choices. As the popular saying goes, "When it comes to elections, it's not the 'Face/Off,' but the Cage effect that counts."


[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2008) observed a positive correlation between celebrity endorsements and political perceptions, shedding light on the potential impact of pop culture icons on electoral choices. Similarly, Jones (2011) explored the intersection of media influence and voter behavior, emphasizing the potency of celebrity visibility in shaping political allegiances. These studies lay the groundwork for our investigation into the peculiar relationship between Nicolas Cage's filmography and the Libertarian votes in Georgia.
While traditional electoral studies have focused on more conventional influencers, such as party affiliations and policy platforms, our inquiry delves into uncharted territory where "Con Air" meets political fervor. The unexpected connection between Cage's cinematic endeavors and Libertarian support in Georgia raises fundamental questions about celebrity influence and its resonance with the electorate.
In "The Cage Conundrum" (2020), the authors posit a novel perspective, proposing that the "Cage Effect" transcends mere cinematic enjoyment, permeating the subconscious of voters and sparking an affinity for the unconventional. Drawing on theories of cognitive dissonance and symbolic interactionism, the study unveils the intricate web of associations between Cage's prolific on-screen presence and voter inclinations. This phenomenon prompts us to ponder, are the citizens of Georgia experiencing a "Raising Arizona" phenomenon, where Cage's cinematic magnetism elevates the appeal of Libertarian ideals?
As we navigate through this unorthodox investigation, it is crucial to consider the wider implications of celebrity influence, beyond the confines of political science alone. In "Celebrity Culture and Society" (2013), the authors delineate the far-reaching impact of celebrity endorsements on consumer behavior and societal norms, proffering a lens through which to comprehend the "Cage Effect" on political preferences. It appears that Cage's cinematic allure may be akin to a "Face/Off" endeavor, where the lines between entertainment and political disposition blur, much like his enigmatic characters' identities.
From the world of fiction, literary works such as Orwell's "1984" and Huxley's "Brave New World" offer allegorical parallels to our exploration of the Cage-Libertarian nexus. These dystopian narratives underscore the subliminal influence of media and entertainment on societal constructs, perhaps mirroring the captivating sway of Cage's cinematic repertoire on the political climate. It seems that for the voters in Georgia, the question may no longer be "Which presidential candidate?" but rather, "Who's watching Nicolas Cage movies?"
On a tangentially related note, it's worth mentioning that amidst the complexities of electoral dynamics and celebrity endorsements, the board game "Monopoly" presents an intriguing analogy. In this classic game of strategic acquisition, players' choices and financial gains are influenced by the properties they acquire and the cards they draw, reflecting the nuanced interplay between external stimuli and individual decisions. In a similar vein, the "Cage Effect" may function as a wildcard in the political domain, influencing voter choices in a manner that's as unpredictable as rolling the dice in a game of chance.
The interplay between Nicolas Cage's cinematic oeuvre and Libertarian votes in Georgia unveils a rich tapestry of improbable connections, inviting us to contemplate the profound implications of celebrity influence on the electoral landscape. In the realm of politics, it appears that Nicolas Cage's on-screen charisma may indeed hold the key to unlocking a new understanding of voter behaviors, prompting us to quip, "Just when you thought you'd seen it all, along comes the 'Cage Effect' to add a twist to the plot!"

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a compelling and statistically significant correlation between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9373380, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8786025, and a p-value less than 0.01, underscore the robustness of this association. It seems that in Georgia, the "Cage Effect" extends far beyond the spotlight, making us ponder whether voters are truly 'Facing the Facts' or simply fans of both liberty and Cage.
As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. Each data point seems to echo the sentiment, "When it comes to voting, there's no 'Cage' for error."
These findings not only add a curious dimension to the intersection of entertainment and politics, but they also beckon us to consider the broader implications of celebrity influence on electoral behaviors. The unexpected nexus between Cage's cinematic ventures and political proclivities opens the door to a myriad of questions, provoking further contemplation on the intricate interplay of pop culture and voting decisions.
In light of these results, it's evident that the "Cage Effect" is a force to be reckoned with in the realm of electoral dynamics, leaving us to ponder whether voters are truly "Gone in 60 Seconds" to cast their ballots in favor of the Libertarian candidate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings offer compelling support to the prior research that has explored the impact of celebrity presence on political behaviors. The strong positive correlation between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia not only corroborates Smith and Doe's (2008) observations of celebrity endorsements' influence on political perceptions but also brings to the fore the unassuming power of the silver screen in shaping electoral choices.

The "Cage Effect," as we affectionately term it, presents an intriguing phenomenon that extends beyond mere cinematic enjoyment. It prompts us to reflect on the extent to which celebrity visibility can translate into political allegiances. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9373380, our results underscore the potency of Cage's cinematic presence in swaying the electoral landscape, making us pause to ponder whether voters are truly "Raising Arizona" in support of the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's cinematic magnetism.

The unexpected revelation of this correlation mirrors Jones's (2011) emphasis on the persuasive impact of media visibility in shaping political inclinations. Cage, with his eclectic repertoire, seems to have spun a web of influence that permeates the subconscious of Georgian voters. As the data unearths this fascinating connection, we cannot help but wonder whether electoral outcomes are as much a product of celebrity allure as they are of policy platforms and ideological alignments.

It seems that in this unpredictable dance of electoral dynamics, the "Cage Effect" functions as an unpredictable wildcard, akin to a draw in the game of Monopoly. As voters in Georgia align themselves with the Libertarian candidate, it's apparent that "Cage" isn't just an actor's name but a factor with potential political implications, embodying the idiosyncrasies of electoral decision-making. This discovery raises the question: "Are Georgia's voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's subtle influence?"

In illuminating the intricate interplay between celebrity influence and political preferences, our study puts forth a lighthearted yet thought-provoking inquiry into the evolving landscape of electoral behaviors. It also underscores the nuanced nature of voter choices, hinting at the possibility that, in the words of Orwell's "1984," the lines between entertainment and political disposition may be more blurred than we perceive.

As we navigate through this unprecedented territory where "Con Air" meets political fervor, our inquiry leads us to a deeper appreciation of the multifaceted ways in which celebrity influence pervades the fabric of electoral decision-making. It reminds us that in the realm of voting dynamics, the "Cage Effect" stands as a testament to the unexpected twists that unfold when pop culture and politics collide. After all, when it comes to elections, it's not just about the "Face/Off" between candidates but the enigmatic sway of Nicolas Cage that counts.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we investigate the intriguing relationship between the number of movies featuring the iconic Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. Using data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1980 to 2020. Our findings reveal a remarkably high positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence and Libertarian support in Georgia.

It appears that the "Cage Effect" extends beyond the silver screen and into the realm of political preferences, prompting us to ponder the profound question: "Are voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's influence?" This unexpected association uncages new avenues for discourse on celebrity influence and electoral behavior, shedding light on the peculiar interplay between pop culture and politics.

As we unravel the enigma of Cage's cinematic charisma intertwined with political leanings, it becomes evident that his cinematic ventures may be more than mere entertainment – they could be a driving force behind electoral choices. As the popular saying goes, "When it comes to elections, it's not the 'Face/Off,' but the Cage effect that counts."


[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of electoral dynamics, factors influencing voters' decisions have long been the subject of rigorous scrutiny. Researchers have delved into demographics, socioeconomic conditions, and political ideologies, striving to discern the underlying determinants of voting patterns. Amidst this scholarly pursuit, a new, unexpected variable has emerged from the eclectic world of film and celebrity: Nicolas Cage. Yes, you read that right - the enigmatic actor has found himself entangled in the political landscape of Georgia, adding a twist to our understanding of electoral behaviors.
The connection between the number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia yields a curious and unexpected correlation. As we embark on this fascinating journey into the "Cage Effect," it behooves us to consider the profound implications of a Hollywood superstar's on-screen presence on the political consciousness of voters. It seems that for Georgia residents, the question may no longer be "What's in the wallet?" but rather, "What's in the Cage?"
The conventional wisdom in electoral studies might lead one to dismiss the influence of a flamboyant actor on voters' decisions, akin to the dismissal of a bee's abilities as un-bee-lievable. However, our analysis has uncovered a statistically significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, revealing a startling link between Cage's filmography and Libertarian votes in Georgia. The correlation is so strong that it's almost as if the more movies Cage stars in, the stronger the support for the Libertarian candidate, prompting us to wonder if voters are captivated by the "Cage Match" between Hollywood dazzle and political ideals.
This unexpected coalescence of the entertainment industry and political allegiances prompts us to consider an unconventional question: Are voters swayed by Cage's on-screen charisma to lean towards the Libertarian candidate, or are they simply seeking a "National Treasure" in the realm of political alternatives? As we delve into this uncharted territory, it becomes clear that the impact of Cage's cinematic presence on electoral preferences is no mere "Gone in 60 Seconds" kind of phenomenon but an intriguing spectacle worthy of scholarly investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a compelling and statistically significant correlation between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. The correlation coefficient of 0.9373380, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.8786025, and a p-value less than 0.01, underscore the robustness of this association. It seems that in Georgia, the "Cage Effect" extends far beyond the spotlight, making us ponder whether voters are truly 'Facing the Facts' or simply fans of both liberty and Cage.
As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between the two variables. Each data point seems to echo the sentiment, "When it comes to voting, there's no 'Cage' for error."
These findings not only add a curious dimension to the intersection of entertainment and politics, but they also beckon us to consider the broader implications of celebrity influence on electoral behaviors. The unexpected nexus between Cage's cinematic ventures and political proclivities opens the door to a myriad of questions, provoking further contemplation on the intricate interplay of pop culture and voting decisions.
In light of these results, it's evident that the "Cage Effect" is a force to be reckoned with in the realm of electoral dynamics, leaving us to ponder whether voters are truly "Gone in 60 Seconds" to cast their ballots in favor of the Libertarian candidate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has revealed an unprecedented correlation between the number of movies featuring Nicolas Cage and votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. The robust positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01 demonstrates a substantial association, leaving us to wonder if voters in Georgia are simply feeling the "Cage Rage" at the ballot box. This unexpected relationship compels us to consider the significant impact of celebrity presence on political preferences, though one might say it's "Nicolas" trouble than we bargained for.

The findings highlight the need to further explore the intricate interplay between entertainment and electoral behavior, suggesting a paradigm shift in our understanding of voter decision-making. As we navigate this uncharted terrain, it becomes clear that Nicolas Cage's cinematic endeavors may be more than mere entertainment - they could be a driving force behind electoral choices in Georgia, proving that in the realm of elections, the "Cage Match" is a significant player.

However, while our study sheds light on this unexpected phenomenon, it's important to acknowledge that correlation does not imply causation, even if it feels as obvious as saying, "Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!" With that said, it seems that for Georgia residents, the "Cage Effect" is a compelling factor in electoral dynamics, though we should approach these findings with cautious optimism.

In light of the compelling evidence presented, it's safe to conclude that further research in this area may not be necessary. After all, when it comes to exploring the "Cage Effect" on Libertarian votes in Georgia, it seems that our study has left no "Nicolas" unturned.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cinematic Political Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Cinematic Analysis and Political Influence


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Cage Effect: Nicolas Cage's Movie Appearances and Libertarian Votes in Georgia with an abstract of In this groundbreaking study, we investigate the intriguing relationship between the number of movies featuring the iconic Nicolas Cage and the votes for the Libertarian presidential candidate in Georgia. Using data from The Movie DB and MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse, we conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning from 1980 to 2020. Our findings reveal a remarkably high positive correlation coefficient of 0.9373380 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong association between Nicolas Cage's cinematic presence and Libertarian support in Georgia.
It appears that the "Cage Effect" extends beyond the silver screen and into the realm of political preferences, prompting us to ponder the profound question: "Are voters 'Leaving Las Vegas' for the Libertarian candidate due to Cage's influence?" This unexpected association uncages new avenues for discourse on celebrity influence and electoral behavior, shedding light on the peculiar interplay between pop culture and politics.
As we unravel the enigma of Cage's cinematic charisma intertwined with political leanings, it becomes evident that his cinematic ventures may be more than mere entertainment – they could be a driving force behind electoral choices. As the popular saying goes, "When it comes to elections, it's not the 'Face/Off,' but the Cage effect that counts.

ChatGPT:

Nicolas Cage movies, libertarian votes, Georgia, political preferences, celebrity influence, electoral behavior, election data analysis, political leanings, pop culture impact, cinematic presence, libertarian support, political implications of celebrity involvement

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in
Source: The Movie DB
Additional Info: Raising Arizona (1987); Leaving Las Vegas (1995); Wild at Heart (1990); City of Angels (1998); Ghost Rider (2007); Con Air (1997); Captain Corelli's Mandolin (2001); Lord of War (2005); World Trade Center (2006); Adaptation. (2002); Red Rock West (1993); It Could Happen to You (1994); The Family Man (2000); Fire Birds (1990); Guarding Tess (1994); Season of the Witch (2011); National Treasure: Book of Secrets (2007); The Weather Man (2005); Vampire's Kiss (1988); Trapped in Paradise (1994); Matchstick Men (2003); Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call - New Orleans (2009); 8MM (1999); Bringing Out the Dead (1999); Snake Eyes (1998); Windtalkers (2002); Gone in Sixty Seconds (2000); The Wicker Man (2006); The Sorcerer's Apprentice (2010); Bangkok Dangerous (2008); Knowing (2009); Zandalee (1991); Astro Boy (2009); Drive Angry (2011); The Croods (2013); Valley Girl (1983); Trespass (2011); Time to Kill (1989); Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (2011); The Boy in Blue (1986); Seeking Justice (2011); Stolen (2012); Joe (2014); The Frozen Ground (2013); Left Behind (2014); Rage (2014); Dying of the Light (2014); Outcast (2014); USS Indianapolis: Men of Courage (2016); Looking Glass (2018); The Trust (2016); The Runner (2015); Pay the Ghost (2015); Next (2007); Army of One (2016); Dog Eat Dog (2016); Vengeance: A Love Story (2017); Mom and Dad (2018); Arsenal (2017); Inconceivable (2017); The Humanity Bureau (2017); Mandy (2018); Primal (2019); 211 (2018); Between Worlds (2018); A Score to Settle (2019); Running with the Devil (2019); Prisoners of the Ghostland (2021); Kill Chain (2020); The Croods: A New Age (2020); Grand Isle (2019); Color Out of Space (2019); Werewolf Women of the S.S. (2007); Pig (2021); Willy's Wonderland (2021); The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent (2022); Butcher's Crossing (2023); The Retirement Plan (2023); The Old Way (2023); Valley Girl: In Conversation - Nicolas Cage And Martha Coolidge (2003); Dream Scenario (2023); Sympathy for the Devil (2023); National Treasure (2004); Face/Off (1997); Peggy Sue Got Married (1986); Moonstruck (1987); Birdy (1984); Kiss of Death (1995); Amos & Andrew (1993); Honeymoon in Vegas (1992); The Rock (1996); Industrial Symphony No. 1: The Dream of the Brokenhearted (1990); Racing with the Moon (1984); Jiu Jitsu (2020); Renfield (2023); Valley Girl: 20 Totally Tubular Years Later (2003); Hot Pink Horror: The Making of Color Out of Space (2020); Kick-Ass (2010); Deadfall (1993); The Ant Bully (2006); Christmas Carol: The Movie (2001); The Best of Times (1981); Shirley Maclaine: Kicking Up Her Heels (1996); Dear Diary: World's First Pranks (2021); I am My Films, Part 2... 30 Years Later (2010); Crossings: John Woo (2004); Never on Tuesday (1989); Love, Antosha (2019); Junket Whore (1998); Becoming Iconic (2018); Sonny (2002); G-Force (2009); With Great Power: The Stan Lee Story (2010); The Music of Valley Girl (2003); Rumble Fish (1983); The Cotton Club (1984); Final Cut: Ladies and Gentlemen (2012); Inside the Golden Statue (1998); Teen Titans Go! To the Movies (2018); Snowden (2016); Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018); Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired (2008); Intimate Portrait: Sean Connery (1998); Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982); The Death of "Superman Lives": What Happened? (2015); Moonstruck: At the Heart of an Italian Family (2006); Brubaker (1980); Grindhouse (2007); The Flash (2023); Mythos Hollywood - Das Geheimnis des Erfolgs (1998); Live 8 (2005)

See what else correlates with The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in

Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia
Detailed data title: Total votes cast for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia
Source: MIT Election Data and Science Lab, Harvard Dataverse
See what else correlates with Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia

Correlation r = 0.9373380 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8786025 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in) over the 10 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.3E-5. 0.0000625113523209642400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.0063% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 15,997 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1980198819921996200020042008201220162020
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in (Movie appearances)1112222254
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia (Total votes)1562784357110178703633218387287314532412530662229




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,1,1,2,2,2,2,2,5,4,])
array_2 = np.array([15627,8435,7110,17870,36332,18387,28731,45324,125306,62229,])
array_1_name = "The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in"
array_2_name = "Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Georgia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 5838 · Black Variable ID: 26630 · Red Variable ID: 25967
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0