Report an error
Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of receptionists in New Hampshire | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of waiters and waitresses in South Carolina | r=0.94 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The number of outdoor power equipment mechanics in Pennsylvania | r=0.93 | 10yrs | Yes! |
xkcd comics published about nostalgia | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
China's Rare Earth Element Export Volume | r=0.71 | 8yrs | No |
Final Match Score Difference in the Volkswagen Challenger Set also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)