Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana increases, so does the frequency of using "language of the game" metaphors in baseball, inspiring the winning team to score more runs. It's a true case of linguistic home run.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a TIME magazine cover with a vibrant classroom scene. The scene should be set in a university in Montana, with foreign language and literature teachers engaging with students in lively discussions. Display the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana prominently on the chalkboard, while on a TV in another part of the room, show a historic World Series game where the winning team joyously crosses home plate. The scoreboard should be visible in the background, displaying the runs scored. The image should portray the dynamism and energy of the classroom while capturing the excitement of the baseball game on the TV. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Montana's surge in foreign language and literature teachers has been linked to a dramatic rise in runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Experts believe that the linguistic diversity is causing the baseball players to communicate better on the field, leading to more successful plays and ultimately, more runs.". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre A TIME magazine cover image Whimsical illustration Cute 2D animation Cubism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vibrant classroom at a university in Montana, a group of foreign language and literature teachers engage with their students in lively discussions. On the chalkboard behind them, the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana is prominently displayed. Meanwhile, in another part of the room, a TV shows a historic World Series game where the winning team joyously crosses home plate, with the scoreboard in the background displaying the runs scored.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a vibrant classroom at a university in Montana, a group of foreign language and literature teachers engage with their students in lively discussions. On the chalkboard behind them, the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana is prominently displayed. Meanwhile, in another part of the room, a TV shows a historic World Series game where the winning team joyously crosses home plate, with the scoreboard in the background displaying the runs scored. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a TIME magazine cover with a vibrant classroom scene. The scene should be set in a university in Montana, with foreign language and literature teachers engaging with students in lively discussions. Display the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana prominently on the chalkboard, while on a TV in another part of the room, show a historic World Series game where the winning team joyously crosses home plate. The scoreboard should be visible in the background, displaying the runs scored. The image should portray the dynamism and energy of the classroom while capturing the excitement of the baseball game on the TV.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana caused Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series to increase.
AI academic paper
Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions The Journal of Linguistic Sporting Alliances Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2013.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the state of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2013. The findings of this study not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between the linguistic academia in Montana and the athletic prowess demonstrated in the global baseball showdown, but also invite further exploration into the mysterious world of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We aim to entertain as well as enlighten, as we unravel this quirky confluence of linguistic expertise and baseball prowess. So grab your baseball mitt and a thesaurus, because this research promises an unexpected journey into the wild world of statistics and language-laden home runs.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the state of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2013. The findings of this study not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between the linguistic academia in Montana and the athletic prowess demonstrated in the global baseball showdown, but also invite further exploration into the mysterious world of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We aim to entertain as well as enlighten, as we unravel this quirky confluence of linguistic expertise and baseball prowess. So grab your baseball mitt and a thesaurus, because this research promises an unexpected journey into the wild world of statistics and language-laden home runs.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Ah, the delightful dance between academia and athletics, between literature and leather balls - an unexpected pas de deux that challenges our preconceptions and tickles our statistical sensibilities. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical quest to uncover the bizarro-world connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the vast expanse of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the esteemed World Series. So, sit back, buckle up, and get ready for a linguistic and statistical rollercoaster ride of epic proportions!
It all began with a glimmer of curiosity and a sprinkle of statistical intrigue. Who would have thought that the scholarly halls of Montana's universities, where the esoteric arts of language and literature are meticulously dissected and debated, could have any bearing on the thunderous crack of a baseball bat in the grandest stage of them all - the World Series?
Our inner data detectives couldn't resist the allure of this oddball connection, and armed with the wits of a Shakespearean scholar and the precision of a baseball umpire, we set out to unravel the enigmatic link between the erudite minds shaping young linguistic talents and the athletic prowess of the baseball elite. And what we unearthed was nothing short of astonishing - a correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 that left our statistical socks thoroughly charmed off!
Armed with nothing but our trusty calculators and an insatiable thirst for quirky knowledge, we ventured deep into the heart of odd correlations and improbable alliances, turning conventional wisdom on its head and leaving traditional statistical analyses quivering in their boots. So, strap in as we navigate the whimsical waters of academia and athletic achievement, for this particular research escapade promises a delightful blend of linguistic twisters and home run whispers. Let the wild rumpus begin!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the state of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2013. The findings of this study not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between the linguistic academia in Montana and the athletic prowess demonstrated in the global baseball showdown, but also invite further exploration into the mysterious world of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We aim to entertain as well as enlighten, as we unravel this quirky confluence of linguistic expertise and baseball prowess. So grab your baseball mitt and a thesaurus, because this research promises an unexpected journey into the wild world of statistics and language-laden home runs.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance between academia and athletics, between literature and leather balls - an unexpected pas de deux that challenges our preconceptions and tickles our statistical sensibilities. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical quest to uncover the bizarro-world connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the vast expanse of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the esteemed World Series. So, sit back, buckle up, and get ready for a linguistic and statistical rollercoaster ride of epic proportions!
It all began with a glimmer of curiosity and a sprinkle of statistical intrigue. Who would have thought that the scholarly halls of Montana's universities, where the esoteric arts of language and literature are meticulously dissected and debated, could have any bearing on the thunderous crack of a baseball bat in the grandest stage of them all - the World Series?
Our inner data detectives couldn't resist the allure of this oddball connection, and armed with the wits of a Shakespearean scholar and the precision of a baseball umpire, we set out to unravel the enigmatic link between the erudite minds shaping young linguistic talents and the athletic prowess of the baseball elite. And what we unearthed was nothing short of astonishing - a correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 that left our statistical socks thoroughly charmed off!
Armed with nothing but our trusty calculators and an insatiable thirst for quirky knowledge, we ventured deep into the heart of odd correlations and improbable alliances, turning conventional wisdom on its head and leaving traditional statistical analyses quivering in their boots. So, strap in as we navigate the whimsical waters of academia and athletic achievement, for this particular research escapade promises a delightful blend of linguistic twisters and home run whispers. Let the wild rumpus begin!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Unlikely Alliances: A Statistical Odyssey," Smith et al. delve into the puzzling correlations that emerge when exploring seemingly unrelated phenomena. It is within this scholarly work that the authors investigate the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in various states and various athletic achievements. A minor nugget within this work hints at the potential linkage between the linguistic prowess of academia and the thunderous crack of the baseball bat, setting the stage for our curious exploration.
Moving on to "The Linguistic Paradoxes of Montana," Doe et al. undertake a thorough investigation into the academic landscape of the state and its curious interplay with otherwise unrelated spheres. While the focus of the study lies primarily in linguistic inquiry, a brief footnote tantalizingly gestures towards the potential ripple effects of Montana's scholarly output on the wider world – a hint that sets our curiosity ablaze.
However, it is in "The Accidental Alliances: A Statistical Anthology" by Jones where the true treasure trove of unexpected connections is revealed. Uncovering a litany of improbable associations, the authors slyly wink at the possibility of linguistic behavior seeping into the most unforeseen realms - including the world of championship sports.
Venturing beyond the realm of compelling nonfiction, the fictitious forays of "Language Lessons to Home Run Hitters" by A. Playwright and "The Ballad of Babble and Bats" by J. Novelist provide a whimsical glimpse into the potential amalgamation of linguistic mastery and athletic prowess. While these works may exist only in the playful realms of fiction, their wry humor and uncanny insight hint at the improbable connections we seek to unravel.
As intrepid researchers, we indulged in immersive reconnaissance, partaking in a viewing of "Linguistic Legends and Baseball Bonanzas" and "Wordsmiths at the World Series." These documentaries, while not academically sanctioned, offer a lighthearted yet potentially enlightening predisposition toward the quirks and curiosities of linguistic academia and the hallowed grounds of baseball glory.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 2003 to 2013
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the state of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2013. The findings of this study not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between the linguistic academia in Montana and the athletic prowess demonstrated in the global baseball showdown, but also invite further exploration into the mysterious world of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We aim to entertain as well as enlighten, as we unravel this quirky confluence of linguistic expertise and baseball prowess. So grab your baseball mitt and a thesaurus, because this research promises an unexpected journey into the wild world of statistics and language-laden home runs.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance between academia and athletics, between literature and leather balls - an unexpected pas de deux that challenges our preconceptions and tickles our statistical sensibilities. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical quest to uncover the bizarro-world connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the vast expanse of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the esteemed World Series. So, sit back, buckle up, and get ready for a linguistic and statistical rollercoaster ride of epic proportions!
It all began with a glimmer of curiosity and a sprinkle of statistical intrigue. Who would have thought that the scholarly halls of Montana's universities, where the esoteric arts of language and literature are meticulously dissected and debated, could have any bearing on the thunderous crack of a baseball bat in the grandest stage of them all - the World Series?
Our inner data detectives couldn't resist the allure of this oddball connection, and armed with the wits of a Shakespearean scholar and the precision of a baseball umpire, we set out to unravel the enigmatic link between the erudite minds shaping young linguistic talents and the athletic prowess of the baseball elite. And what we unearthed was nothing short of astonishing - a correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 that left our statistical socks thoroughly charmed off!
Armed with nothing but our trusty calculators and an insatiable thirst for quirky knowledge, we ventured deep into the heart of odd correlations and improbable alliances, turning conventional wisdom on its head and leaving traditional statistical analyses quivering in their boots. So, strap in as we navigate the whimsical waters of academia and athletic achievement, for this particular research escapade promises a delightful blend of linguistic twisters and home run whispers. Let the wild rumpus begin!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To undertake this whimsical investigation into the quirky connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series, our research design was as multifaceted as a baseball diamond. We gathered data from 2003 to 2013, utilizing a blend of traditional statistical approaches and a sprinkle of offbeat methodologies that would make even the most seasoned data analyst raise an eyebrow.
First, we scoured the internet for relevant information, with the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia serving as our primary sources. Armed with the web equivalent of a metal detector, we sifted through virtual haystacks to find the linguistic and baseball needles hiding within the digital confines. Our search was reminiscent of a daring treasure hunt, albeit one where the treasure was an abundance of statistical data rather than gold doubloons.
Once the data was assembled, we employed a mix of quantitative and qualitative analyses - a statistical tango, if you will. Our trusty calculators hummed with the fervor of a symphony orchestra as we calculated correlation coefficients and conducted regressions, all the while keeping a keen eye on outlier detection. We didn't shy away from the scholarly sibling rivalry between language and mathematics, leveraging the power of statistical software to wrangle the data into submission, much like a determined pitcher aiming for a strikeout.
Furthermore, our methodology delved into the linguistic nuances of the data itself. We engaged in an interpretative dance with the numbers, seeking to unravel the narrative hidden within the statistical symphony. Like intrepid explorers of the linguistic jungle, we mined the depths of textual sources to contextualize the findings within the broader landscape of academia and athletics. This qualitative approach provided a rich tapestry of insight, akin to a pitcher painting the corners of the strike zone with finesse.
To ensure the reliability and validity of our findings, we employed rigorous checks and balances, as steadfast as the rules of fair play in baseball. Sensitivity analyses and robustness checks became our steadfast companions, guarding against the pitfalls of spurious correlations and misleading inferences. We aimed to fortify our results against the onslaught of skepticism, just as a stout defense protects a precious lead in the late innings of a championship game.
In conclusion, our methodology was a harmonious blend of the conventional and the unconventional, much like the marriage of academia and athletics in this peculiar study. Through our quirky approach and rigorous analyses, we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between Montana's linguistic luminaries and the feats of home run heroics in the World Series. With statistical prowess and linguistic flair, we forged ahead, eager to shed light on this peculiar partnership between the two seemingly disparate realms.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Wikipedia .
For the time period 2003 to 2013, you found a correlation 0.9012523, r-squared of 0.8122557, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the state of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2013. The findings of this study not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between the linguistic academia in Montana and the athletic prowess demonstrated in the global baseball showdown, but also invite further exploration into the mysterious world of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We aim to entertain as well as enlighten, as we unravel this quirky confluence of linguistic expertise and baseball prowess. So grab your baseball mitt and a thesaurus, because this research promises an unexpected journey into the wild world of statistics and language-laden home runs.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the delightful dance between academia and athletics, between literature and leather balls - an unexpected pas de deux that challenges our preconceptions and tickles our statistical sensibilities. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical quest to uncover the bizarro-world connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the vast expanse of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the esteemed World Series. So, sit back, buckle up, and get ready for a linguistic and statistical rollercoaster ride of epic proportions!
It all began with a glimmer of curiosity and a sprinkle of statistical intrigue. Who would have thought that the scholarly halls of Montana's universities, where the esoteric arts of language and literature are meticulously dissected and debated, could have any bearing on the thunderous crack of a baseball bat in the grandest stage of them all - the World Series?
Our inner data detectives couldn't resist the allure of this oddball connection, and armed with the wits of a Shakespearean scholar and the precision of a baseball umpire, we set out to unravel the enigmatic link between the erudite minds shaping young linguistic talents and the athletic prowess of the baseball elite. And what we unearthed was nothing short of astonishing - a correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 that left our statistical socks thoroughly charmed off!
Armed with nothing but our trusty calculators and an insatiable thirst for quirky knowledge, we ventured deep into the heart of odd correlations and improbable alliances, turning conventional wisdom on its head and leaving traditional statistical analyses quivering in their boots. So, strap in as we navigate the whimsical waters of academia and athletic achievement, for this particular research escapade promises a delightful blend of linguistic twisters and home run whispers. Let the wild rumpus begin!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series are as jaw-dropping as a curveball on a sunny day. Our data revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9012523, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. In other words, as the number of language and literature instructors in Montana increased, so did the runs scored by the victorious team in the World Series.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8122557 suggests that approximately 81.23% of the variability in the runs scored by the winning team can be explained by the number of language and literature teachers in Montana. This finding serves as a testament to the robustness of the observed relationship and highlights the significance of linguistic prowess in shaping the outcomes of America's favorite pastime.
Notably, our p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence that the observed correlation is not due to sheer chance, but rather reflects a genuine connection between these unlikely bedfellows. It's as if the linguistic musings of Montana's scholarly minds have been whispering strategic cues to the baseball diamonds of the World Series, sparking a synergy as captivating as a well-crafted haiku.
To visually encapsulate the sheer astonishment of our findings, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between the two variables. Brace yourselves for a visual feast that marries the elegance of academic discourse with the adrenaline-pumping excitement of sports triumphs.
In summary, the results of this study not only uncover the enigmatic bond between Montana's linguistic luminaries and the grandeur of the World Series, but also beckon us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical investigations. This peculiar correlation invites further exploration into the whimsical world of unlikely collaborations, promising a symphony of intellectual banter and sporting exploits as we continue to peel back the layers of this lighthearted mystery.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the state of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2013. The findings of this study not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between the linguistic academia in Montana and the athletic prowess demonstrated in the global baseball showdown, but also invite further exploration into the mysterious world of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We aim to entertain as well as enlighten, as we unravel this quirky confluence of linguistic expertise and baseball prowess. So grab your baseball mitt and a thesaurus, because this research promises an unexpected journey into the wild world of statistics and language-laden home runs.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Unlikely Alliances: A Statistical Odyssey," Smith et al. delve into the puzzling correlations that emerge when exploring seemingly unrelated phenomena. It is within this scholarly work that the authors investigate the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in various states and various athletic achievements. A minor nugget within this work hints at the potential linkage between the linguistic prowess of academia and the thunderous crack of the baseball bat, setting the stage for our curious exploration.
Moving on to "The Linguistic Paradoxes of Montana," Doe et al. undertake a thorough investigation into the academic landscape of the state and its curious interplay with otherwise unrelated spheres. While the focus of the study lies primarily in linguistic inquiry, a brief footnote tantalizingly gestures towards the potential ripple effects of Montana's scholarly output on the wider world – a hint that sets our curiosity ablaze.
However, it is in "The Accidental Alliances: A Statistical Anthology" by Jones where the true treasure trove of unexpected connections is revealed. Uncovering a litany of improbable associations, the authors slyly wink at the possibility of linguistic behavior seeping into the most unforeseen realms - including the world of championship sports.
Venturing beyond the realm of compelling nonfiction, the fictitious forays of "Language Lessons to Home Run Hitters" by A. Playwright and "The Ballad of Babble and Bats" by J. Novelist provide a whimsical glimpse into the potential amalgamation of linguistic mastery and athletic prowess. While these works may exist only in the playful realms of fiction, their wry humor and uncanny insight hint at the improbable connections we seek to unravel.
As intrepid researchers, we indulged in immersive reconnaissance, partaking in a viewing of "Linguistic Legends and Baseball Bonanzas" and "Wordsmiths at the World Series." These documentaries, while not academically sanctioned, offer a lighthearted yet potentially enlightening predisposition toward the quirks and curiosities of linguistic academia and the hallowed grounds of baseball glory.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series are as jaw-dropping as a curveball on a sunny day. Our data revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9012523, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. In other words, as the number of language and literature instructors in Montana increased, so did the runs scored by the victorious team in the World Series.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8122557 suggests that approximately 81.23% of the variability in the runs scored by the winning team can be explained by the number of language and literature teachers in Montana. This finding serves as a testament to the robustness of the observed relationship and highlights the significance of linguistic prowess in shaping the outcomes of America's favorite pastime.
Notably, our p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence that the observed correlation is not due to sheer chance, but rather reflects a genuine connection between these unlikely bedfellows. It's as if the linguistic musings of Montana's scholarly minds have been whispering strategic cues to the baseball diamonds of the World Series, sparking a synergy as captivating as a well-crafted haiku.
To visually encapsulate the sheer astonishment of our findings, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between the two variables. Brace yourselves for a visual feast that marries the elegance of academic discourse with the adrenaline-pumping excitement of sports triumphs.
In summary, the results of this study not only uncover the enigmatic bond between Montana's linguistic luminaries and the grandeur of the World Series, but also beckon us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical investigations. This peculiar correlation invites further exploration into the whimsical world of unlikely collaborations, promising a symphony of intellectual banter and sporting exploits as we continue to peel back the layers of this lighthearted mystery.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The implications of our findings are as striking as a grand slam in the bottom of the ninth. The robust correlation we uncovered between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series not only serves as a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly unconnected domains but also adds a layer of whimsical intrigue to the world of statistical inquiry.
Firstly, our results not only support but also build upon the prior research that hinted at the potential linkage between linguistic prowess and athletic achievements. The works of Smith et al., Doe et al., and Jones sowed the seeds of curiosity, hinting at the unsuspected dominos of consequence that linguistic expertise might set in motion. By unveiling the remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 in our current study, we have bolstered these scholarly musings with empirical evidence that firmly establishes the influence of linguistic academia on the outcomes of the World Series – a connection as unexpected as a knuckleball in a sea of fastballs.
Furthermore, our results lend credence to the light-hearted yet potentially enlightening predispositions put forth in the non-academically sanctioned documentaries we immersively reconnoitered. These whimsical excursions into the curiosities of linguistic academia and the hallowed grounds of baseball glory now take on a new resonance, as our findings breathe life into the fanciful notions of potential amalgamation between linguistic mastery and athletic prowess.
As we close this chapter of the investigation, the lyrical dance of our statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a testament to the authenticity of the discovered correlation. It's as if our data is the baseball, and the p-value is the resounding crack of the bat that unmistakably declares, "I'm no fluke, I'm the real deal!" This finding not only solidifies the legitimacy of the unexpected bond between Montana's scholarly linguists and the accolades of the World Series but also beckons us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical investigations.
In conclusion, our study not only uncovers an enigmatic bond that transcends the boundaries of academia and athletics but also invites future researchers to venture into the wildly unexpected union of linguistic acumen and home run heroics. Our findings promise a symphony of intellectual banter and sporting exploits, akin to a high-stakes game of Scrabble played in the dugouts of the World Series. So as we bid adieu to this chapter, let's remember that in the wondrous world of statistics, even the most improbable correlations can turn out to be a home run.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the state of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2013. The findings of this study not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between the linguistic academia in Montana and the athletic prowess demonstrated in the global baseball showdown, but also invite further exploration into the mysterious world of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We aim to entertain as well as enlighten, as we unravel this quirky confluence of linguistic expertise and baseball prowess. So grab your baseball mitt and a thesaurus, because this research promises an unexpected journey into the wild world of statistics and language-laden home runs.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the delightful dance between academia and athletics, between literature and leather balls - an unexpected pas de deux that challenges our preconceptions and tickles our statistical sensibilities. In this paper, we embark on a whimsical quest to uncover the bizarro-world connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the vast expanse of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the esteemed World Series. So, sit back, buckle up, and get ready for a linguistic and statistical rollercoaster ride of epic proportions!
It all began with a glimmer of curiosity and a sprinkle of statistical intrigue. Who would have thought that the scholarly halls of Montana's universities, where the esoteric arts of language and literature are meticulously dissected and debated, could have any bearing on the thunderous crack of a baseball bat in the grandest stage of them all - the World Series?
Our inner data detectives couldn't resist the allure of this oddball connection, and armed with the wits of a Shakespearean scholar and the precision of a baseball umpire, we set out to unravel the enigmatic link between the erudite minds shaping young linguistic talents and the athletic prowess of the baseball elite. And what we unearthed was nothing short of astonishing - a correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 that left our statistical socks thoroughly charmed off!
Armed with nothing but our trusty calculators and an insatiable thirst for quirky knowledge, we ventured deep into the heart of odd correlations and improbable alliances, turning conventional wisdom on its head and leaving traditional statistical analyses quivering in their boots. So, strap in as we navigate the whimsical waters of academia and athletic achievement, for this particular research escapade promises a delightful blend of linguistic twisters and home run whispers. Let the wild rumpus begin!
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series are as jaw-dropping as a curveball on a sunny day. Our data revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9012523, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. In other words, as the number of language and literature instructors in Montana increased, so did the runs scored by the victorious team in the World Series.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8122557 suggests that approximately 81.23% of the variability in the runs scored by the winning team can be explained by the number of language and literature teachers in Montana. This finding serves as a testament to the robustness of the observed relationship and highlights the significance of linguistic prowess in shaping the outcomes of America's favorite pastime.
Notably, our p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence that the observed correlation is not due to sheer chance, but rather reflects a genuine connection between these unlikely bedfellows. It's as if the linguistic musings of Montana's scholarly minds have been whispering strategic cues to the baseball diamonds of the World Series, sparking a synergy as captivating as a well-crafted haiku.
To visually encapsulate the sheer astonishment of our findings, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between the two variables. Brace yourselves for a visual feast that marries the elegance of academic discourse with the adrenaline-pumping excitement of sports triumphs.
In summary, the results of this study not only uncover the enigmatic bond between Montana's linguistic luminaries and the grandeur of the World Series, but also beckon us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of statistical investigations. This peculiar correlation invites further exploration into the whimsical world of unlikely collaborations, promising a symphony of intellectual banter and sporting exploits as we continue to peel back the layers of this lighthearted mystery.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
As we lace up our linguistic cleats and bid adieu to the quirky tango between Montana's language professors and the World Series victors, we can't help but marvel at the absurdity and wonder that this adventure has brought to light. The statistically significant correlation we've uncovered between the number of language and literature teachers and runs scored in the World Series is as unexpected as finding a vocabulary quiz in the batter's box.
Our investigation has not only unveiled the improbable dance of academia and athleticism but has also peeled back the layers of statistical oddities, showcasing the capriciousness of correlations and the comedic timing of incongruous connections. It's as if the linguistic prowess of Montana has been whispering sweet sonnets to the baseball diamonds, nudging their performance to lyrical heights.
In the spirit of academic revelry and athletic whimsy, we must acknowledge that further exploration in this domain feels as unnecessary as trying to teach a fish French. The delightful peculiarity of this correlation stands as a testament to the mischievous nature of statistical coincidences and is as unique as a bilingual outfielder.
Therefore, we stand firm in our declaration that no more research is needed in this area. Instead, let us bask in the eccentricity of this discovery, relishing in the delightfully droll alliance between the eloquence of language and the euphoria of sports triumphs. It's been a wild, innings-filled ride, but now it's time to hang up our linguistic gloves and savor the statistical zaniness we've uncovered.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Linguistic Sporting Alliances
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Multilingual Athletics and Academics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the unexpected connection between the number of university foreign language and literature teachers in the state of Montana and the runs scored by the winning team in the World Series. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Wikipedia, our research team uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9012523 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2003 to 2013. The findings of this study not only shed light on the peculiar relationship between the linguistic academia in Montana and the athletic prowess demonstrated in the global baseball showdown, but also invite further exploration into the mysterious world of seemingly unrelated phenomena. We aim to entertain as well as enlighten, as we unravel this quirky confluence of linguistic expertise and baseball prowess. So grab your baseball mitt and a thesaurus, because this research promises an unexpected journey into the wild world of statistics and language-laden home runs.
ChatGPT:
Montana, language professors, World Series champions, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wikipedia, linguistic academia, athletic prowess, baseball showdown, linguistic expertise, baseball prowess, statistics, language, home runs
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in MontanaDetailed data title: BLS estimate of foreign language and literature teachers, postsecondary in Montana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana
Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8122557 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana) over the 11 years from 2003 through 2013.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00015. 0.0001514336353565868400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,604 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.66, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |
The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana (Laborers) | 60 | 70 | 60 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 60 | 70 |
Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series (Runs scored) | 17 | 24 | 20 | 22 | 29 | 24 | 32 | 29 | 38 | 16 | 27 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([60,70,60,70,70,70,80,80,80,60,70,])
array_2 = np.array([17,24,20,22,29,24,32,29,38,16,27,])
array_1_name = "The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana"
array_2_name = "Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of university foreign language and literature teachers in Montana
- Line chart for only Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series
- The spurious research paper: Lost in Translation: The Unlikely Alliances Between Montana's Language Professors and World Series Champions
I'm grateful for your review!
Correlation ID: 1325 · Black Variable ID: 10695 · Red Variable ID: 534