about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,517 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the second variable is Solar power generated in Cuba.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Lorenzo introduces themselves, the excitement in the air triggers a series of spontaneous dance-offs in Cuba. The rhythmic movements of the dancers somehow sync up with the sun's energy, leading to a surge in solar power generation. It's like a giant, unintentional, and totally groovy generator for clean energy!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that presents a warm, nostalgic Polaroid photo capturing the essence of a bustling town square in Cuba. In the scene, a group of locals have gathered around a sleek solar panel installation dedicated to Lorenzo, their beloved community leader. The panels gleam in the Caribbean sun, harnessing its energy to power the nearby buildings and streetlights. As people chat and enjoy the vibrant atmosphere, they glance up at the solar panels, appreciating Lorenzo's dedication to sustainable energy. The Polaroid-style image evokes a sense of nostalgia and captures the vibrant ambiance of the town square. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Macabre Steampunk Symbolism a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: a Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling town square in Cuba, a group of locals gather around a solar panel installation dedicated to Lorenzo, their beloved community leader. The panels gleam in the Caribbean sun, harnessing its energy to power the nearby buildings and streetlights. As people chat and enjoy the vibrant atmosphere, they glance up at the solar panels, appreciating Lorenzo's dedication to sustainable energy and the increasing popularity of his name as they do so.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling town square in Cuba, a group of locals gather around a solar panel installation dedicated to Lorenzo, their beloved community leader. The panels gleam in the Caribbean sun, harnessing its energy to power the nearby buildings and streetlights. As people chat and enjoy the vibrant atmosphere, they glance up at the solar panels, appreciating Lorenzo's dedication to sustainable energy and the increasing popularity of his name as they do so. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that presents a warm, nostalgic Polaroid photo capturing the essence of a bustling town square in Cuba. In the scene, a group of locals have gathered around a sleek solar panel installation dedicated to Lorenzo, their beloved community leader. The panels gleam in the Caribbean sun, harnessing its energy to power the nearby buildings and streetlights. As people chat and enjoy the vibrant atmosphere, they glance up at the solar panels, appreciating Lorenzo's dedication to sustainable energy. The Polaroid-style image evokes a sense of nostalgia and captures the vibrant ambiance of the town square.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Lorenzo caused Solar power generated in Cuba to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Lorenzo Effect: Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba

Journal of Solar Sociodynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The "Lorenzo Effect": Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we embark on a statistical journey to decipher the "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the two variables from 1999 to 2021. The implications of these results for both the fields of naming trends and renewable energy are discussed with a touch of lightheartedness. We ponder whether it's the radiant aura of the name Lorenzo that fuels the solar power generation in Cuba or if it's simply a delightful coincidence. While this seemingly unusual connection may raise an eyebrow or two, it sheds light on the unexpected intersections of human naming choices and sustainable energy sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Lorenzo Effect": Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we embark on a statistical journey to decipher the "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the two variables from 1999 to 2021. The implications of these results for both the fields of naming trends and renewable energy are discussed with a touch of lightheartedness. We ponder whether it's the radiant aura of the name Lorenzo that fuels the solar power generation in Cuba or if it's simply a delightful coincidence. While this seemingly unusual connection may raise an eyebrow or two, it sheds light on the unexpected intersections of human naming choices and sustainable energy sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of human naming trends and environmental factors has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. While much attention has been given to the cultural and sociological implications of popular names, the potential relationship between the popularity of specific names and environmental phenomena has remained relatively unexplored. In this study, we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the widespread use of the first name Lorenzo and the generation of solar power in the vibrant island nation of Cuba.

The concept of the "Lorenzo Effect" may initially appear to be nothing more than a whimsical curiosity, akin to discovering a pineapple pizza in a world of traditional margheritas. However, as we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and data mining, we begin to uncover the intriguing patterns that underlie this seemingly improbable correlation. The allure of the name Lorenzo, with its mellifluous vowels and resonant consonants, prompts us to ponder whether there may be more at play here than mere happenstance. Is it conceivable that the name Lorenzo exerts a subtle influence on the solar energy landscape of Cuba, akin to a sunbeam peeking through a cloud?

As with any scientific endeavor, it is imperative to approach this investigation with a balanced mix of skepticism and open-minded inquiry. While we embark on this scholarly escapade with a twinkle in our eyes, we remain steadfast in our commitment to rigorous methodology and empirical evidence. Our aim is not only to shed light on the "Lorenzo Effect" but also to illuminate the broader significance of such unconventional associations in the realms of naming patterns and environmental sustainability. After all, what's in a name, if not a potential source of renewable energy?

The intrigue surrounding the "Lorenzo Effect" serves as a poignant reminder of the serendipitous connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate domains converge. As we navigate the intricate landscape of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we invite our readers to join us on this intellectual adventure, where the boundaries between playful speculation and serious inquiry begin to blur. In the end, perhaps we will emerge not only with valuable insights into the interplay of human nomenclature and solar power generation but also with a newfound appreciation for the delightful unpredictability of scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Lorenzo Effect": Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we embark on a statistical journey to decipher the "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the two variables from 1999 to 2021. The implications of these results for both the fields of naming trends and renewable energy are discussed with a touch of lightheartedness. We ponder whether it's the radiant aura of the name Lorenzo that fuels the solar power generation in Cuba or if it's simply a delightful coincidence. While this seemingly unusual connection may raise an eyebrow or two, it sheds light on the unexpected intersections of human naming choices and sustainable energy sources.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human naming trends and environmental factors has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. While much attention has been given to the cultural and sociological implications of popular names, the potential relationship between the popularity of specific names and environmental phenomena has remained relatively unexplored. In this study, we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the widespread use of the first name Lorenzo and the generation of solar power in the vibrant island nation of Cuba.
The concept of the "Lorenzo Effect" may initially appear to be nothing more than a whimsical curiosity, akin to discovering a pineapple pizza in a world of traditional margheritas. However, as we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and data mining, we begin to uncover the intriguing patterns that underlie this seemingly improbable correlation. The allure of the name Lorenzo, with its mellifluous vowels and resonant consonants, prompts us to ponder whether there may be more at play here than mere happenstance. Is it conceivable that the name Lorenzo exerts a subtle influence on the solar energy landscape of Cuba, akin to a sunbeam peeking through a cloud?
As with any scientific endeavor, it is imperative to approach this investigation with a balanced mix of skepticism and open-minded inquiry. While we embark on this scholarly escapade with a twinkle in our eyes, we remain steadfast in our commitment to rigorous methodology and empirical evidence. Our aim is not only to shed light on the "Lorenzo Effect" but also to illuminate the broader significance of such unconventional associations in the realms of naming patterns and environmental sustainability. After all, what's in a name, if not a potential source of renewable energy?
The intrigue surrounding the "Lorenzo Effect" serves as a poignant reminder of the serendipitous connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate domains converge. As we navigate the intricate landscape of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we invite our readers to join us on this intellectual adventure, where the boundaries between playful speculation and serious inquiry begin to blur. In the end, perhaps we will emerge not only with valuable insights into the interplay of human nomenclature and solar power generation but also with a newfound appreciation for the delightful unpredictability of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The "Lorenzo Effect" has sparked scholarly curiosity in the intersection of human naming patterns and environmental variables, prompting researchers to explore the unexpected correlations that may emerge from this seemingly whimsical juxtaposition. In the following review, we examine existing literature on naming trends, solar power generation, and the potential interplay between the two domains, incorporating both serious academic studies and amusingly tangential sources to illuminate the multifaceted nature of the "Lorenzo Effect."

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of naming trends in the United States, documenting the prevalence of names with romantic and melodious connotations. The authors observed a subtle yet intriguing rise in the popularity of names such as "Lorenzo," noting the captivating allure of these sonorous monikers. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2017) delved into the intricate dynamics of solar power generation in Caribbean countries, highlighting Cuba's burgeoning renewable energy initiatives. Though devoid of explicit references to individual names, their work laid the groundwork for exploring the potential correlations between naming preferences and sustainable energy practices.

Turning our attention to more tangential sources, "The Power of Positive Energy" by Lorenzo Lightfoot delves into the metaphysical underpinnings of personal aura and vibrational influences. While ostensibly unrelated to the empirical investigation at hand, this esoteric exploration offers a whimsical parallel to the purported "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. On a similarly speculative note, "Sunshine and Serendipity" by Amber Solaris weaves a tale of unexpected connections and joyful happenstance, serving as a lighthearted nod to the fortuitous nature of our research endeavor.

In a departure from traditional academic literature, the board game "Solar Settlers" introduces players to the complexities of managing solar power resources in a fictional intergalactic setting. While purely fictitious and whimsical in nature, the game's thematic resonance with our investigation underscores the playful and imaginative dimensions of the "Lorenzo Effect." Furthermore, the novel "The Name of the Sun" by Stella Solaria artfully intertwines themes of solar mythology and the evocative power of names, offering a delightful departure from conventional scholarly discourse while evoking intriguing parallels with our own inquiry.

In traversing this diverse landscape of literature, from serious academic studies to delightfully tangential narratives, we are reminded of the serendipitous intersections that animate the pursuit of knowledge. While the scholarly pursuit of the "Lorenzo Effect" remains grounded in empirical rigor, it is equally enriched by the whimsy and wonder that accompany the exploration of unconventional and unexpected connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1999 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Lorenzo Effect": Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we embark on a statistical journey to decipher the "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the two variables from 1999 to 2021. The implications of these results for both the fields of naming trends and renewable energy are discussed with a touch of lightheartedness. We ponder whether it's the radiant aura of the name Lorenzo that fuels the solar power generation in Cuba or if it's simply a delightful coincidence. While this seemingly unusual connection may raise an eyebrow or two, it sheds light on the unexpected intersections of human naming choices and sustainable energy sources.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of human naming trends and environmental factors has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. While much attention has been given to the cultural and sociological implications of popular names, the potential relationship between the popularity of specific names and environmental phenomena has remained relatively unexplored. In this study, we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the widespread use of the first name Lorenzo and the generation of solar power in the vibrant island nation of Cuba.
The concept of the "Lorenzo Effect" may initially appear to be nothing more than a whimsical curiosity, akin to discovering a pineapple pizza in a world of traditional margheritas. However, as we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and data mining, we begin to uncover the intriguing patterns that underlie this seemingly improbable correlation. The allure of the name Lorenzo, with its mellifluous vowels and resonant consonants, prompts us to ponder whether there may be more at play here than mere happenstance. Is it conceivable that the name Lorenzo exerts a subtle influence on the solar energy landscape of Cuba, akin to a sunbeam peeking through a cloud?
As with any scientific endeavor, it is imperative to approach this investigation with a balanced mix of skepticism and open-minded inquiry. While we embark on this scholarly escapade with a twinkle in our eyes, we remain steadfast in our commitment to rigorous methodology and empirical evidence. Our aim is not only to shed light on the "Lorenzo Effect" but also to illuminate the broader significance of such unconventional associations in the realms of naming patterns and environmental sustainability. After all, what's in a name, if not a potential source of renewable energy?
The intrigue surrounding the "Lorenzo Effect" serves as a poignant reminder of the serendipitous connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate domains converge. As we navigate the intricate landscape of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we invite our readers to join us on this intellectual adventure, where the boundaries between playful speculation and serious inquiry begin to blur. In the end, perhaps we will emerge not only with valuable insights into the interplay of human nomenclature and solar power generation but also with a newfound appreciation for the delightful unpredictability of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our quest to unravel the mystical "Lorenzo Effect," we adopted a methodological approach as eclectic and diverse as the range of solar panels glistening across the Cuban landscape. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we harnessed the power of statistical analysis to shed light on the interplay between the popularity of the name Lorenzo and solar power generation in Cuba.

Our first step involved collecting an extensive dataset encompassing the frequency of occurrences of the first name Lorenzo across the United States from 1999 to 2021. This data was readily available from the US Social Security Administration, allowing us to trace the undulating waves of Lorenzo's ascent or decline in popularity over the years. We then turned our gaze toward the radiant shores of Cuba, where the Energy Information Administration provided us with comprehensive information on solar power generation during the same time period. Following this, we engaged in a delicately choreographed dance of data cleaning and pre-processing, akin to ensuring that each solar panel was flawlessly aligned to capture maximum sunlight.

Next, our statistical toolkit was wielded with the finesse of a maestro conducting a symphony, as we delved into the world of correlation analysis. Employing Pearson's correlation coefficient, we sought to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the popularity of the name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Our eyes sparkled with anticipation as the results unfurled before us, revealing a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370, accompanied by a p-value that inspired awe with its diminutive stature of less than 0.01. The resounding harmony of these statistical indicators pointed to a robust and significant association between the captivating allure of Lorenzo and the radiant embrace of solar power in Cuba.

In order to validate the robustness of our findings, we meticulously conducted sensitivity analyses and diagnostic tests, akin to fine-tuning the lenses of a solar observatory to capture the most intricate celestial phenomena. Furthermore, we performed a series of sensitivity analyses to ensure the stability and resilience of our findings, recognizing the need to withstand the tempestuous winds of scientific inquiry.

As with any endeavor of discovery, our methodology was not exempt from the occasional whimsical observation, for science should always have room for a touch of lightheartedness. Our statistical odyssey traversed the terrain of hypothesis testing and model validation, resembling a captivating tale of adventure punctuated by the occasional unexpected twist in the narrative.

In summary, our methodology encapsulated the confluence of rigorous statistical analysis, whimsical curiosity, and unyielding dedication to illuminating the enigmatic "Lorenzo Effect." This methodological journey mirrors the serendipitous dance of scientific discovery, where the unexpected emerges from the seemingly ordinary, and the boundaries between investigation and enchantment blur into a captivating symphony of scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1999 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9722370, r-squared of 0.9452447, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The "Lorenzo Effect": Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we embark on a statistical journey to decipher the "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the two variables from 1999 to 2021. The implications of these results for both the fields of naming trends and renewable energy are discussed with a touch of lightheartedness. We ponder whether it's the radiant aura of the name Lorenzo that fuels the solar power generation in Cuba or if it's simply a delightful coincidence. While this seemingly unusual connection may raise an eyebrow or two, it sheds light on the unexpected intersections of human naming choices and sustainable energy sources.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of human naming trends and environmental factors has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. While much attention has been given to the cultural and sociological implications of popular names, the potential relationship between the popularity of specific names and environmental phenomena has remained relatively unexplored. In this study, we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the widespread use of the first name Lorenzo and the generation of solar power in the vibrant island nation of Cuba.
The concept of the "Lorenzo Effect" may initially appear to be nothing more than a whimsical curiosity, akin to discovering a pineapple pizza in a world of traditional margheritas. However, as we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and data mining, we begin to uncover the intriguing patterns that underlie this seemingly improbable correlation. The allure of the name Lorenzo, with its mellifluous vowels and resonant consonants, prompts us to ponder whether there may be more at play here than mere happenstance. Is it conceivable that the name Lorenzo exerts a subtle influence on the solar energy landscape of Cuba, akin to a sunbeam peeking through a cloud?
As with any scientific endeavor, it is imperative to approach this investigation with a balanced mix of skepticism and open-minded inquiry. While we embark on this scholarly escapade with a twinkle in our eyes, we remain steadfast in our commitment to rigorous methodology and empirical evidence. Our aim is not only to shed light on the "Lorenzo Effect" but also to illuminate the broader significance of such unconventional associations in the realms of naming patterns and environmental sustainability. After all, what's in a name, if not a potential source of renewable energy?
The intrigue surrounding the "Lorenzo Effect" serves as a poignant reminder of the serendipitous connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate domains converge. As we navigate the intricate landscape of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we invite our readers to join us on this intellectual adventure, where the boundaries between playful speculation and serious inquiry begin to blur. In the end, perhaps we will emerge not only with valuable insights into the interplay of human nomenclature and solar power generation but also with a newfound appreciation for the delightful unpredictability of scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba from 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient between these seemingly unrelated variables was found to be 0.9722370, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. Further, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) amounted to 0.9452447, signifying that approximately 94.5% of the variability in solar power generation in Cuba can be explained by the popularity of the name Lorenzo. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests a highly significant association between the two variables, leaving little room for chance or random fluctuations to explain this perplexing connection.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation identified during our investigation, presenting a compelling visual representation of the relationship between the prevalence of the name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. The datapoints form a near-perfect linear pattern, akin to a carefully arranged constellation in the night sky, hinting at a connection that may be more than mere happenstance.

These findings prompt us to consider the potential impact of the "Lorenzo Effect" on the cultural and energy landscapes of Cuba. Could it be that the allure and charm of the name Lorenzo ripple through the societal fabric, influencing the adoption and generation of solar power in this Caribbean nation? Or is this correlation simply an amusing quirk of statistical analysis, akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure in a game of hide-and-seek? As we navigate the realm of statistical inquiry and whimsical conjecture, the mystery surrounding the "Lorenzo Effect" continues to beguile and fascinate, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the intersection of human naming choices and renewable energy dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The "Lorenzo Effect": Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we embark on a statistical journey to decipher the "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the two variables from 1999 to 2021. The implications of these results for both the fields of naming trends and renewable energy are discussed with a touch of lightheartedness. We ponder whether it's the radiant aura of the name Lorenzo that fuels the solar power generation in Cuba or if it's simply a delightful coincidence. While this seemingly unusual connection may raise an eyebrow or two, it sheds light on the unexpected intersections of human naming choices and sustainable energy sources.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The "Lorenzo Effect" has sparked scholarly curiosity in the intersection of human naming patterns and environmental variables, prompting researchers to explore the unexpected correlations that may emerge from this seemingly whimsical juxtaposition. In the following review, we examine existing literature on naming trends, solar power generation, and the potential interplay between the two domains, incorporating both serious academic studies and amusingly tangential sources to illuminate the multifaceted nature of the "Lorenzo Effect."
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of naming trends in the United States, documenting the prevalence of names with romantic and melodious connotations. The authors observed a subtle yet intriguing rise in the popularity of names such as "Lorenzo," noting the captivating allure of these sonorous monikers. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2017) delved into the intricate dynamics of solar power generation in Caribbean countries, highlighting Cuba's burgeoning renewable energy initiatives. Though devoid of explicit references to individual names, their work laid the groundwork for exploring the potential correlations between naming preferences and sustainable energy practices.
Turning our attention to more tangential sources, "The Power of Positive Energy" by Lorenzo Lightfoot delves into the metaphysical underpinnings of personal aura and vibrational influences. While ostensibly unrelated to the empirical investigation at hand, this esoteric exploration offers a whimsical parallel to the purported "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. On a similarly speculative note, "Sunshine and Serendipity" by Amber Solaris weaves a tale of unexpected connections and joyful happenstance, serving as a lighthearted nod to the fortuitous nature of our research endeavor.
In a departure from traditional academic literature, the board game "Solar Settlers" introduces players to the complexities of managing solar power resources in a fictional intergalactic setting. While purely fictitious and whimsical in nature, the game's thematic resonance with our investigation underscores the playful and imaginative dimensions of the "Lorenzo Effect." Furthermore, the novel "The Name of the Sun" by Stella Solaria artfully intertwines themes of solar mythology and the evocative power of names, offering a delightful departure from conventional scholarly discourse while evoking intriguing parallels with our own inquiry.
In traversing this diverse landscape of literature, from serious academic studies to delightfully tangential narratives, we are reminded of the serendipitous intersections that animate the pursuit of knowledge. While the scholarly pursuit of the "Lorenzo Effect" remains grounded in empirical rigor, it is equally enriched by the whimsy and wonder that accompany the exploration of unconventional and unexpected connections.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba from 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient between these seemingly unrelated variables was found to be 0.9722370, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. Further, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) amounted to 0.9452447, signifying that approximately 94.5% of the variability in solar power generation in Cuba can be explained by the popularity of the name Lorenzo. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests a highly significant association between the two variables, leaving little room for chance or random fluctuations to explain this perplexing connection.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation identified during our investigation, presenting a compelling visual representation of the relationship between the prevalence of the name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. The datapoints form a near-perfect linear pattern, akin to a carefully arranged constellation in the night sky, hinting at a connection that may be more than mere happenstance.
These findings prompt us to consider the potential impact of the "Lorenzo Effect" on the cultural and energy landscapes of Cuba. Could it be that the allure and charm of the name Lorenzo ripple through the societal fabric, influencing the adoption and generation of solar power in this Caribbean nation? Or is this correlation simply an amusing quirk of statistical analysis, akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure in a game of hide-and-seek? As we navigate the realm of statistical inquiry and whimsical conjecture, the mystery surrounding the "Lorenzo Effect" continues to beguile and fascinate, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the intersection of human naming choices and renewable energy dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation provide compelling evidence supporting the existence of a significant relationship between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. These findings resonate with prior research that has probed the unexpected correlations and whimsical intersections in the realms of naming trends and sustainable energy sources.

The literature review not only highlighted serious academic studies but also playfully nodded to tangential sources, setting the stage for our own empirical exploration. The rise in the popularity of names with romantic and melodious connotations, as documented by Smith et al. (2015), indeed foreshadowed the captivating allure of names such as "Lorenzo." Similarly, while Doe and Jones (2017) did not explicitly delve into individual names, their work laid the groundwork for contemplating the potential interplay between naming preferences and sustainable energy practices, much like our own investigation. Even the seemingly whimsical sources, such as "The Power of Positive Energy" by Lorenzo Lightfoot and "Sunshine and Serendipity" by Amber Solaris, offered playful parallels to the purported "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. It goes to show that sometimes truth is indeed stranger than fiction, and statistical analysis can uncover correlations that are both surprising and meaningful.

Our results, with a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, align with the quirkiness and wonder captured in the literature review. The near-perfect linear pattern in the scatterplot resembles a carefully arranged constellation, embodying the unexpected treasure we stumbled upon through statistical analysis. This whimsical discovery adds a touch of lightheartedness to the often-serious discourse of statistical research, presenting the "Lorenzo Effect" as a delightful and thought-provoking lens through which to view the intersection of human naming choices and renewable energy dynamics.

In conclusion, our findings not only uphold the substantial statistical association between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba but also underscore the enduring whimsy and curiosity that underlie the pursuit of knowledge. The "Lorenzo Effect" serves as a testament to the delightful surprises that punctuate the scientific landscape, proving that even the most unexpected connections can yield valuable insights and spark ingenious inquiries.

This calls for a round of applause for statistical serendipity and a celebratory toast to the enigmatic allure of the name Lorenzo. Cheers to shedding light on the unforeseen, one statistical analysis at a time!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lorenzo and Solar power generated in Cuba. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The "Lorenzo Effect": Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we embark on a statistical journey to decipher the "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the two variables from 1999 to 2021. The implications of these results for both the fields of naming trends and renewable energy are discussed with a touch of lightheartedness. We ponder whether it's the radiant aura of the name Lorenzo that fuels the solar power generation in Cuba or if it's simply a delightful coincidence. While this seemingly unusual connection may raise an eyebrow or two, it sheds light on the unexpected intersections of human naming choices and sustainable energy sources.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of human naming trends and environmental factors has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. While much attention has been given to the cultural and sociological implications of popular names, the potential relationship between the popularity of specific names and environmental phenomena has remained relatively unexplored. In this study, we set out to unravel the enigmatic connection between the widespread use of the first name Lorenzo and the generation of solar power in the vibrant island nation of Cuba.
The concept of the "Lorenzo Effect" may initially appear to be nothing more than a whimsical curiosity, akin to discovering a pineapple pizza in a world of traditional margheritas. However, as we delve into the realm of statistical analysis and data mining, we begin to uncover the intriguing patterns that underlie this seemingly improbable correlation. The allure of the name Lorenzo, with its mellifluous vowels and resonant consonants, prompts us to ponder whether there may be more at play here than mere happenstance. Is it conceivable that the name Lorenzo exerts a subtle influence on the solar energy landscape of Cuba, akin to a sunbeam peeking through a cloud?
As with any scientific endeavor, it is imperative to approach this investigation with a balanced mix of skepticism and open-minded inquiry. While we embark on this scholarly escapade with a twinkle in our eyes, we remain steadfast in our commitment to rigorous methodology and empirical evidence. Our aim is not only to shed light on the "Lorenzo Effect" but also to illuminate the broader significance of such unconventional associations in the realms of naming patterns and environmental sustainability. After all, what's in a name, if not a potential source of renewable energy?
The intrigue surrounding the "Lorenzo Effect" serves as a poignant reminder of the serendipitous connections that can emerge when seemingly disparate domains converge. As we navigate the intricate landscape of data analysis and hypothesis testing, we invite our readers to join us on this intellectual adventure, where the boundaries between playful speculation and serious inquiry begin to blur. In the end, perhaps we will emerge not only with valuable insights into the interplay of human nomenclature and solar power generation but also with a newfound appreciation for the delightful unpredictability of scientific exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba from 1999 to 2021. The correlation coefficient between these seemingly unrelated variables was found to be 0.9722370, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. Further, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) amounted to 0.9452447, signifying that approximately 94.5% of the variability in solar power generation in Cuba can be explained by the popularity of the name Lorenzo. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests a highly significant association between the two variables, leaving little room for chance or random fluctuations to explain this perplexing connection.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the robust correlation identified during our investigation, presenting a compelling visual representation of the relationship between the prevalence of the name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. The datapoints form a near-perfect linear pattern, akin to a carefully arranged constellation in the night sky, hinting at a connection that may be more than mere happenstance.
These findings prompt us to consider the potential impact of the "Lorenzo Effect" on the cultural and energy landscapes of Cuba. Could it be that the allure and charm of the name Lorenzo ripple through the societal fabric, influencing the adoption and generation of solar power in this Caribbean nation? Or is this correlation simply an amusing quirk of statistical analysis, akin to stumbling upon an unexpected treasure in a game of hide-and-seek? As we navigate the realm of statistical inquiry and whimsical conjecture, the mystery surrounding the "Lorenzo Effect" continues to beguile and fascinate, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the intersection of human naming choices and renewable energy dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled the captivating connection between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. The remarkably high correlation coefficient and p-value underscore the robustness of this unexpected relationship, which stands as a testament to the whimsical dance of statistics. While some may view our findings as akin to stumbling upon a colorful umbrella in a gusty wind, we are reminded of the surprising and delightful aspects of scientific inquiry. The implications of the "Lorenzo Effect" extend beyond the realms of naming trends and renewable energy; they beckon us to embrace the serendipitous wonder that permeates the landscape of academic exploration.

The allure of the name Lorenzo, with its melodic cadence and resonating syllables, offers a tantalizing narrative for the interplay between human nomenclature and sustainable energy practices. As we bid adieu to this scholarly escapade, we cannot help but think of the potential for a whimsically titled sequel – "Lorenzo's Solar Campaign: A Tale of Renewable Radiance." However, such playful musings do not detract from the substantive implications of our findings. The "Lorenzo Effect" serves as a nod to the unexpected intersections that enliven the tapestry of scientific discovery, reminding us that even the most unlikely of connections may hold illuminating insights.

We confidently assert that no further research in this domain is needed, as this investigation has shed ample light on the captivating "Lorenzo Effect." With a twinkle in our eyes and a hint of irrepressible curiosity, we bid farewell to this peculiar yet enlightening foray into the world of statistical oddities, leaving behind a trail of playful puns and scholarly musings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Lorenzo Effect: Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Solar Sociodynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Lorenzo Effect: Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Renewable Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Lorenzo Effect: Shedding Light on the Relationship between Lorenzo's Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Cuba with an abstract of This study investigates the intriguing link between the popularity of the first name Lorenzo and the solar power generated in Cuba. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we embark on a statistical journey to decipher the "Lorenzo Effect" on solar power generation. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9722370 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between the two variables from 1999 to 2021. The implications of these results for both the fields of naming trends and renewable energy are discussed with a touch of lightheartedness. We ponder whether it's the radiant aura of the name Lorenzo that fuels the solar power generation in Cuba or if it's simply a delightful coincidence. While this seemingly unusual connection may raise an eyebrow or two, it sheds light on the unexpected intersections of human naming choices and sustainable energy sources.

ChatGPT:

Lorenzo, popularity, solar power, generation, Cuba, correlation, statistical analysis, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, renewable energy, naming trends, sustainable energy sources

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Lorenzo
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Lorenzo
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Lorenzo

Solar power generated in Cuba
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Cuba in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Cuba

Correlation r = 0.9722370 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9452447 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Cuba) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Lorenzo) over the 23 years from 1999 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.0006E-14. 0.0000000000000100063818287441
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 1.0006E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 99,936,222,414,322 random variables You don't actually need 99 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Lorenzo (Babies born)946922888987963107610281111117298795496410321088151616411843187320032251264824542777
Solar power generated in Cuba (Billion kWh)0.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.0020.0020.0150.1130.0940.1260.1430.0750.1610.2320.2420.26




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([946,922,888,987,963,1076,1028,1111,1172,987,954,964,1032,1088,1516,1641,1843,1873,2003,2251,2648,2454,2777,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.002,0.002,0.015,0.113,0.094,0.126,0.143,0.075,0.161,0.232,0.242,0.26,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Lorenzo"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Cuba"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 1517 · Black Variable ID: 2529 · Red Variable ID: 23616
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0