Download png, svg
AI explanation
As xkcd comics about politics decreased, their signature combination of wit and satire was no longer able to contain the wild antics of the political landscape. This led to a surge in politicians behaving like unruly animals, prompting a higher demand for animal control workers in New Jersey to wrangle and manage the newly feral government officials. The ensuing chaos ultimately required a specialized task force of animal control workers to navigate the political jungle, thus contributing to the overall increase in manpower dedicated to taming the political zoo.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a black-and-white newspaper illustration. Depict a cozy office in New Jersey, with an xkcd comic about politics taped to the wall eliciting chuckles from animal control workers. The room is filled with the sound of ringing phones and lively discussion as the workers go about their duties, ensuring the well-being of the state's furry and feathered residents. Capture the essence of a bustling yet lighthearted atmosphere in the office, with attention to detail on the characters and their activities. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art A black-and-white newspaper illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie inspired by bauhaus Symbolism
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy office in New Jersey, an xkcd comic about politics is taped to the wall, eliciting a few chuckles from the animal control workers as they go about their duties. The room is filled with the sound of ringing phones and lively discussion as the workers go about their day, ensuring the well-being of the state's furry and feathered residents.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy office in New Jersey, an xkcd comic about politics is taped to the wall, eliciting a few chuckles from the animal control workers as they go about their duties. The room is filled with the sound of ringing phones and lively discussion as the workers go about their day, ensuring the well-being of the state's furry and feathered residents. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a black-and-white newspaper illustration. Depict a cozy office in New Jersey, with an xkcd comic about politics taped to the wall eliciting chuckles from animal control workers. The room is filled with the sound of ringing phones and lively discussion as the workers go about their duties, ensuring the well-being of the state's furry and feathered residents. Capture the essence of a bustling yet lighthearted atmosphere in the office, with attention to detail on the characters and their activities.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in xkcd comics published about politics caused The number of animal control workers in New Jersey to decrease.
AI academic paper
The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey Journal of Satirical Sociopolitical Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey"
[[ABSTRACT]]
Fellow academics and pun aficionados, get ready to be tickled as we delve into the improbable connection between xkcd comics about politics and the number of animal control workers in the quaint state of New Jersey. Employing a blend of humor, AI analysis, and statistical wizardry, our research team embarked on an empirical quest to investigate this peculiar nexus and unleash the unexpected correlations lurking in the realm of data.
In our analysis, which spans the years 2007 to 2022, we discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991, with a p-value less than 0.01, presenting a compelling case for the impact of xkcd political comics on the labor force of animal control in the Garden State. As the saying goes, every dog has its day, and our findings reveal an intriguing intertwining of political satire and the diligent individuals ensuring the harmony of human-animal coexistence.
As we navigate this curious conundrum, it's no coincidence that our endeavor unravels unexpected synergies and yields empirical evidence infused with some comedic relief. After all, who knew that the whimsical world of webcomics could have palpable implications for the workforce of our furry friends' custodians? This research delivers a blend of academic rigor and a whimsical spirit, presenting findings that are bound to provoke a chuckle or two in scholarly circles.
In conclusion, while our study may draw some raised eyebrows, it offers a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a playful twist. So, as we bid adieu to this remarkable journey, let us ponder the words of humorist Mark Twain: "The human race has only one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." And perhaps, the same goes for statistical analysis laced with a touch of whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey"
[[ABSTRACT]]
Fellow academics and pun aficionados, get ready to be tickled as we delve into the improbable connection between xkcd comics about politics and the number of animal control workers in the quaint state of New Jersey. Employing a blend of humor, AI analysis, and statistical wizardry, our research team embarked on an empirical quest to investigate this peculiar nexus and unleash the unexpected correlations lurking in the realm of data.
In our analysis, which spans the years 2007 to 2022, we discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991, with a p-value less than 0.01, presenting a compelling case for the impact of xkcd political comics on the labor force of animal control in the Garden State. As the saying goes, every dog has its day, and our findings reveal an intriguing intertwining of political satire and the diligent individuals ensuring the harmony of human-animal coexistence.
As we navigate this curious conundrum, it's no coincidence that our endeavor unravels unexpected synergies and yields empirical evidence infused with some comedic relief. After all, who knew that the whimsical world of webcomics could have palpable implications for the workforce of our furry friends' custodians? This research delivers a blend of academic rigor and a whimsical spirit, presenting findings that are bound to provoke a chuckle or two in scholarly circles.
In conclusion, while our study may draw some raised eyebrows, it offers a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a playful twist. So, as we bid adieu to this remarkable journey, let us ponder the words of humorist Mark Twain: "The human race has only one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." And perhaps, the same goes for statistical analysis laced with a touch of whimsy.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Picture this: a world where political satire merges with the unassuming realm of animal control employment trends. Our research ventures into the uncharted territory of exploring the unexpected bond between xkcd comics and the number of animal control workers bustling in the charming abode of New Jersey.
It's no secret that humor and data analysis rarely collide, but in this instance, they undeniably do. Delving into the annals of numerical investigation, we found ourselves deep in the numbers, striving to uncover correlations that may seem as improbable as finding a cat who loves water. Speaking of improbable, why don't programmers like nature? It has too many bugs!
Our journey begins with a whimsical yet enigmatic pursuit, where the beloved webcomics of xkcd serve as the harbinger of potential influence on the labor force dedicated to the orderly cohabitation of humans and our furry companions. As we weave through the labyrinth of data points, there's a compelling urge to inject a dash of levity into our scholarly discourse. After all, what's the use of statistical analysis without a bit of statistical comedy? I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug.
As our study unfolds, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this delightful expedition, where we marinate our findings in a delightful blend of empirical rigor and a flavor of unexpected amusement. Akin to a captivating sitcom, our research refuses to abide by the norms of mundane scholarly investigation, infusing a touch of playfulness that's as refreshing as a well-timed knock-knock joke. Knock-knock. Who's there? Animal. Animal who? Animal control worker, answering your call of distress.
In the spirit of merriment and meticulous inquiry, we invite you to embark on this journey with us, as we untangle the web of correlations that bring together the world of webcomics and the diligent custodians of New Jersey's animal kingdom. So fasten your seatbelts, fellow researchers, for we assure you that this academic ride is sure to be a delightfully unexpected one. And remember, in the world of data exploration, even the most serious analyses can benefit from a touch of humor.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey"
[[ABSTRACT]]
Fellow academics and pun aficionados, get ready to be tickled as we delve into the improbable connection between xkcd comics about politics and the number of animal control workers in the quaint state of New Jersey. Employing a blend of humor, AI analysis, and statistical wizardry, our research team embarked on an empirical quest to investigate this peculiar nexus and unleash the unexpected correlations lurking in the realm of data.
In our analysis, which spans the years 2007 to 2022, we discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991, with a p-value less than 0.01, presenting a compelling case for the impact of xkcd political comics on the labor force of animal control in the Garden State. As the saying goes, every dog has its day, and our findings reveal an intriguing intertwining of political satire and the diligent individuals ensuring the harmony of human-animal coexistence.
As we navigate this curious conundrum, it's no coincidence that our endeavor unravels unexpected synergies and yields empirical evidence infused with some comedic relief. After all, who knew that the whimsical world of webcomics could have palpable implications for the workforce of our furry friends' custodians? This research delivers a blend of academic rigor and a whimsical spirit, presenting findings that are bound to provoke a chuckle or two in scholarly circles.
In conclusion, while our study may draw some raised eyebrows, it offers a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a playful twist. So, as we bid adieu to this remarkable journey, let us ponder the words of humorist Mark Twain: "The human race has only one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." And perhaps, the same goes for statistical analysis laced with a touch of whimsy.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Picture this: a world where political satire merges with the unassuming realm of animal control employment trends. Our research ventures into the uncharted territory of exploring the unexpected bond between xkcd comics and the number of animal control workers bustling in the charming abode of New Jersey.
It's no secret that humor and data analysis rarely collide, but in this instance, they undeniably do. Delving into the annals of numerical investigation, we found ourselves deep in the numbers, striving to uncover correlations that may seem as improbable as finding a cat who loves water. Speaking of improbable, why don't programmers like nature? It has too many bugs!
Our journey begins with a whimsical yet enigmatic pursuit, where the beloved webcomics of xkcd serve as the harbinger of potential influence on the labor force dedicated to the orderly cohabitation of humans and our furry companions. As we weave through the labyrinth of data points, there's a compelling urge to inject a dash of levity into our scholarly discourse. After all, what's the use of statistical analysis without a bit of statistical comedy? I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug.
As our study unfolds, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this delightful expedition, where we marinate our findings in a delightful blend of empirical rigor and a flavor of unexpected amusement. Akin to a captivating sitcom, our research refuses to abide by the norms of mundane scholarly investigation, infusing a touch of playfulness that's as refreshing as a well-timed knock-knock joke. Knock-knock. Who's there? Animal. Animal who? Animal control worker, answering your call of distress.
In the spirit of merriment and meticulous inquiry, we invite you to embark on this journey with us, as we untangle the web of correlations that bring together the world of webcomics and the diligent custodians of New Jersey's animal kingdom. So fasten your seatbelts, fellow researchers, for we assure you that this academic ride is sure to be a delightfully unexpected one. And remember, in the world of data exploration, even the most serious analyses can benefit from a touch of humor.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe, in "The Impact of Webcomics on Socioeconomic Behavior," analyze the potential influence of webcomics on various aspects of modern society. While their study primarily focuses on the impact of webcomics in a broader context, it raises intriguing questions about the potential effects of politically themed webcomics on specific employment sectors. As we delve into our exploration of the intersection between xkcd comics and animal control employment in New Jersey, we unlock a Pandora's box of unexpected correlations that may leave readers howling with laughter. Why did the chicken join a comedy troupe? Because it wanted to crack yolks!
Jones et al. offer a different perspective in "Quantitative Analysis of Internet Humor and Its Socioeconomic Ramifications," positing that online satire and humor can exert subtle but tangible effects on societal structures. While their research does not directly touch on the labor market of animal control workers, it lays the groundwork for understanding the potential impact of web-based satire on professional domains. Our investigation weaves through the maze of data with a curiosity that rivals a cat's pursuit of a laser pointer, and we uncover unexpected patterns that may elicit a chuckle or two. Did you hear the rumor about butter? Well, I'm not going to spread it!
In the realm of non-fiction, works such as "Fur, Feathers, and Politics" by Animal Rights Activist and "The Paw-litical Economy of New Jersey" by Local Historian shed light on the historical and social dimensions of human-animal relationships and the governance structures that oversee them. While these texts do not directly engage with the influence of webcomics on labor dynamics, they provide crucial context for understanding the poignant link between political discourse and the guardianship of New Jersey's animal population. Our inquiry navigates this landscape with the finesse of a squirrel traversing power lines, poised to unearth correlations that may elicit a smile or, perhaps, a hearty guffaw. Why don't dogs make good dancers? Because they have two left feet!
Turning to the realm of fiction, works like "Animal Farm" by George Orwell and "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame offer allegorical and whimsical portrayals of animals and their interactions with human society. While these literary creations may seem worlds apart from the influence of webcomics on labor trends, they inspire our exploration with the reminder that the unexpected can often take center stage. Our research, much like a cat burglar in the night, stealthily enters into the obscure corridors of correlation, ready to surprise and entertain. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear!
As our journey unfolds, we must acknowledge that our review of literature extends beyond conventional sources, as we also drew inspiration from unconventional realms. In the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, we admit to consulting the backs of shampoo bottles, where we surprisingly found a plethora of puns and lighthearted quips. Despite their unconventional nature, these sources underscore the undeniable presence of humor in the most unexpected of places. In the spirit of good-natured inquiry, we embrace the whimsy that flavors our research, recognizing that even the most serious of endeavors benefits from the occasional splash of levity. After all, who says statistical analyses can't inspire a giggle or a groan every now and then?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2007 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey"
[[ABSTRACT]]
Fellow academics and pun aficionados, get ready to be tickled as we delve into the improbable connection between xkcd comics about politics and the number of animal control workers in the quaint state of New Jersey. Employing a blend of humor, AI analysis, and statistical wizardry, our research team embarked on an empirical quest to investigate this peculiar nexus and unleash the unexpected correlations lurking in the realm of data.
In our analysis, which spans the years 2007 to 2022, we discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991, with a p-value less than 0.01, presenting a compelling case for the impact of xkcd political comics on the labor force of animal control in the Garden State. As the saying goes, every dog has its day, and our findings reveal an intriguing intertwining of political satire and the diligent individuals ensuring the harmony of human-animal coexistence.
As we navigate this curious conundrum, it's no coincidence that our endeavor unravels unexpected synergies and yields empirical evidence infused with some comedic relief. After all, who knew that the whimsical world of webcomics could have palpable implications for the workforce of our furry friends' custodians? This research delivers a blend of academic rigor and a whimsical spirit, presenting findings that are bound to provoke a chuckle or two in scholarly circles.
In conclusion, while our study may draw some raised eyebrows, it offers a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a playful twist. So, as we bid adieu to this remarkable journey, let us ponder the words of humorist Mark Twain: "The human race has only one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." And perhaps, the same goes for statistical analysis laced with a touch of whimsy.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Picture this: a world where political satire merges with the unassuming realm of animal control employment trends. Our research ventures into the uncharted territory of exploring the unexpected bond between xkcd comics and the number of animal control workers bustling in the charming abode of New Jersey.
It's no secret that humor and data analysis rarely collide, but in this instance, they undeniably do. Delving into the annals of numerical investigation, we found ourselves deep in the numbers, striving to uncover correlations that may seem as improbable as finding a cat who loves water. Speaking of improbable, why don't programmers like nature? It has too many bugs!
Our journey begins with a whimsical yet enigmatic pursuit, where the beloved webcomics of xkcd serve as the harbinger of potential influence on the labor force dedicated to the orderly cohabitation of humans and our furry companions. As we weave through the labyrinth of data points, there's a compelling urge to inject a dash of levity into our scholarly discourse. After all, what's the use of statistical analysis without a bit of statistical comedy? I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug.
As our study unfolds, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this delightful expedition, where we marinate our findings in a delightful blend of empirical rigor and a flavor of unexpected amusement. Akin to a captivating sitcom, our research refuses to abide by the norms of mundane scholarly investigation, infusing a touch of playfulness that's as refreshing as a well-timed knock-knock joke. Knock-knock. Who's there? Animal. Animal who? Animal control worker, answering your call of distress.
In the spirit of merriment and meticulous inquiry, we invite you to embark on this journey with us, as we untangle the web of correlations that bring together the world of webcomics and the diligent custodians of New Jersey's animal kingdom. So fasten your seatbelts, fellow researchers, for we assure you that this academic ride is sure to be a delightfully unexpected one. And remember, in the world of data exploration, even the most serious analyses can benefit from a touch of humor.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In pursuit of unraveling the inexplicable interplay between xkcd political comics and the employment landscape of animal control in New Jersey, our intrepid research team embarked on a multifaceted and, dare I say, pun-believably quirky methodology. As we began our investigation, we first employed the latest in AI-assisted comic analysis to identify xkcd comics explicitly related to political themes. Our crack team of AI systems combed through an extensive collection of xkcd archives, surfing through web panels like data detectives in search of the humor-laden nuggets that touched upon the political spectrum.
Once we curated this comedic corpus, it was time for the data to summon some more "pawsitivities." We couldn't resist the temptation to engage in a bit of statistical wizardry, and so we applied a series of rigorous regression analyses to correlate the publication dates of the selected xkcd political comics with the number of animal control workers employed in the majestic Garden State of New Jersey. Navigating through the labyrinth of data points and p-values felt a bit like herding cats, but we persevered in our pursuit of statistical harmony.
Furthermore, we augmented our analysis with insights from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, leveraging their treasure trove of employment data spanning the years 2007 to 2022. A tale of two data sources, if you will, where comic whimsy met the sobering reality of labor force statistics. An unlikely duo, akin to a fusion of a jestful jester and a serious statistician, brought together by the serendipitous dance of information collection.
In addition, to ensure the robustness of our analyses, we implemented time-series models to account for any potential temporal dynamics that may influence the relationship between xkcd political comics and the ebb and flow of animal control employment in the expanse of New Jersey. This undertaking was as complex as teaching a cat to tap dance, but we remained undeterred as we attempted to unveil the elusive kinetics that underpin this unconventional nexus.
Lastly, as we ventured further into the statistical jungle, we couldn't resist the temptation to incorporate sentiment analysis to gauge the comedic tenor of the xkcd political comics. After all, what's the use of studying humor without delving into its whimsical nuances? It was a bit like deciphering the punchlines of a sophisticated joke, but our foray into sentiment analysis added a touch of mirthful introspection to our empirical arsenal.
In conclusion, our methodology traversed the realms of AI, statistics, labor data, and sentiment analysis, reminiscent of an academic carnival where numbers danced with humor, and correlations mingled with merriment. It was a journey where the unexpected met the empirical, akin to the whimsical fusion of an xkcd comic and an animal control quip. Such is the essence of scholarly exploration - where methodological rigor meets a sprinkle of wit, paving the way for discoveries that are as academically enlightening as they are delightfully entertaining.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7490991, r-squared of 0.5611494, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey"
[[ABSTRACT]]
Fellow academics and pun aficionados, get ready to be tickled as we delve into the improbable connection between xkcd comics about politics and the number of animal control workers in the quaint state of New Jersey. Employing a blend of humor, AI analysis, and statistical wizardry, our research team embarked on an empirical quest to investigate this peculiar nexus and unleash the unexpected correlations lurking in the realm of data.
In our analysis, which spans the years 2007 to 2022, we discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991, with a p-value less than 0.01, presenting a compelling case for the impact of xkcd political comics on the labor force of animal control in the Garden State. As the saying goes, every dog has its day, and our findings reveal an intriguing intertwining of political satire and the diligent individuals ensuring the harmony of human-animal coexistence.
As we navigate this curious conundrum, it's no coincidence that our endeavor unravels unexpected synergies and yields empirical evidence infused with some comedic relief. After all, who knew that the whimsical world of webcomics could have palpable implications for the workforce of our furry friends' custodians? This research delivers a blend of academic rigor and a whimsical spirit, presenting findings that are bound to provoke a chuckle or two in scholarly circles.
In conclusion, while our study may draw some raised eyebrows, it offers a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a playful twist. So, as we bid adieu to this remarkable journey, let us ponder the words of humorist Mark Twain: "The human race has only one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." And perhaps, the same goes for statistical analysis laced with a touch of whimsy.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Picture this: a world where political satire merges with the unassuming realm of animal control employment trends. Our research ventures into the uncharted territory of exploring the unexpected bond between xkcd comics and the number of animal control workers bustling in the charming abode of New Jersey.
It's no secret that humor and data analysis rarely collide, but in this instance, they undeniably do. Delving into the annals of numerical investigation, we found ourselves deep in the numbers, striving to uncover correlations that may seem as improbable as finding a cat who loves water. Speaking of improbable, why don't programmers like nature? It has too many bugs!
Our journey begins with a whimsical yet enigmatic pursuit, where the beloved webcomics of xkcd serve as the harbinger of potential influence on the labor force dedicated to the orderly cohabitation of humans and our furry companions. As we weave through the labyrinth of data points, there's a compelling urge to inject a dash of levity into our scholarly discourse. After all, what's the use of statistical analysis without a bit of statistical comedy? I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug.
As our study unfolds, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this delightful expedition, where we marinate our findings in a delightful blend of empirical rigor and a flavor of unexpected amusement. Akin to a captivating sitcom, our research refuses to abide by the norms of mundane scholarly investigation, infusing a touch of playfulness that's as refreshing as a well-timed knock-knock joke. Knock-knock. Who's there? Animal. Animal who? Animal control worker, answering your call of distress.
In the spirit of merriment and meticulous inquiry, we invite you to embark on this journey with us, as we untangle the web of correlations that bring together the world of webcomics and the diligent custodians of New Jersey's animal kingdom. So fasten your seatbelts, fellow researchers, for we assure you that this academic ride is sure to be a delightfully unexpected one. And remember, in the world of data exploration, even the most serious analyses can benefit from a touch of humor.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of xkcd comics depicting political subject matter and the employment trends of animal control workers in New Jersey has yielded intriguing results. Over the 15-year period from 2007 to 2022, our research unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991 and an r-squared value of 0.5611494. In statistical terms, it turns out that the idiosyncratic musings of xkcd's political satire are not to be taken lightly, especially when it comes to the labor market of the Garden State. This unexpected relationship prompts the question: what do you get when you cross a political comic with a New Jersey animal control worker? A statistically significant correlation!
The significance level, with a p-value lower than 0.01, cements the statistical robustness of our findings, establishing a compelling case for the impact of internet humor on the workforce dedicated to the welfare of our furry friends. As we paws to contemplate the implications of these results, it's no stretch to say that the influence of xkcd's political comics on the employment dynamics of animal control workers in New Jersey is nothing to wag our tails at.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) reveals a visually striking relationship between the xkcd factor and the number of animal control workers, demonstrating an unmistakable trend that would make even the most ardent skeptic do a double take. Much like a well-crafted punchline, our findings deliver a surprise twist in the often somber and stoic world of empirical research. It's clear that within the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a touch of unexpected humor.
In summary, our research unearths a compelling nexus between the whimsical world of webcomics and the real-world impact on the labor force, serving as a refreshing reminder that data analysis, much like life, can benefit from a sprinkle of comedy. As we adjourn this lively excursion into the peculiar connections of statistical investigation and humor, let us remember the immortal words of scholarly wit: "The proof is in the pudding, but a good joke is the icing on the cake."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey"
[[ABSTRACT]]
Fellow academics and pun aficionados, get ready to be tickled as we delve into the improbable connection between xkcd comics about politics and the number of animal control workers in the quaint state of New Jersey. Employing a blend of humor, AI analysis, and statistical wizardry, our research team embarked on an empirical quest to investigate this peculiar nexus and unleash the unexpected correlations lurking in the realm of data.
In our analysis, which spans the years 2007 to 2022, we discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991, with a p-value less than 0.01, presenting a compelling case for the impact of xkcd political comics on the labor force of animal control in the Garden State. As the saying goes, every dog has its day, and our findings reveal an intriguing intertwining of political satire and the diligent individuals ensuring the harmony of human-animal coexistence.
As we navigate this curious conundrum, it's no coincidence that our endeavor unravels unexpected synergies and yields empirical evidence infused with some comedic relief. After all, who knew that the whimsical world of webcomics could have palpable implications for the workforce of our furry friends' custodians? This research delivers a blend of academic rigor and a whimsical spirit, presenting findings that are bound to provoke a chuckle or two in scholarly circles.
In conclusion, while our study may draw some raised eyebrows, it offers a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a playful twist. So, as we bid adieu to this remarkable journey, let us ponder the words of humorist Mark Twain: "The human race has only one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." And perhaps, the same goes for statistical analysis laced with a touch of whimsy.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe, in "The Impact of Webcomics on Socioeconomic Behavior," analyze the potential influence of webcomics on various aspects of modern society. While their study primarily focuses on the impact of webcomics in a broader context, it raises intriguing questions about the potential effects of politically themed webcomics on specific employment sectors. As we delve into our exploration of the intersection between xkcd comics and animal control employment in New Jersey, we unlock a Pandora's box of unexpected correlations that may leave readers howling with laughter. Why did the chicken join a comedy troupe? Because it wanted to crack yolks!
Jones et al. offer a different perspective in "Quantitative Analysis of Internet Humor and Its Socioeconomic Ramifications," positing that online satire and humor can exert subtle but tangible effects on societal structures. While their research does not directly touch on the labor market of animal control workers, it lays the groundwork for understanding the potential impact of web-based satire on professional domains. Our investigation weaves through the maze of data with a curiosity that rivals a cat's pursuit of a laser pointer, and we uncover unexpected patterns that may elicit a chuckle or two. Did you hear the rumor about butter? Well, I'm not going to spread it!
In the realm of non-fiction, works such as "Fur, Feathers, and Politics" by Animal Rights Activist and "The Paw-litical Economy of New Jersey" by Local Historian shed light on the historical and social dimensions of human-animal relationships and the governance structures that oversee them. While these texts do not directly engage with the influence of webcomics on labor dynamics, they provide crucial context for understanding the poignant link between political discourse and the guardianship of New Jersey's animal population. Our inquiry navigates this landscape with the finesse of a squirrel traversing power lines, poised to unearth correlations that may elicit a smile or, perhaps, a hearty guffaw. Why don't dogs make good dancers? Because they have two left feet!
Turning to the realm of fiction, works like "Animal Farm" by George Orwell and "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame offer allegorical and whimsical portrayals of animals and their interactions with human society. While these literary creations may seem worlds apart from the influence of webcomics on labor trends, they inspire our exploration with the reminder that the unexpected can often take center stage. Our research, much like a cat burglar in the night, stealthily enters into the obscure corridors of correlation, ready to surprise and entertain. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear!
As our journey unfolds, we must acknowledge that our review of literature extends beyond conventional sources, as we also drew inspiration from unconventional realms. In the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding, we admit to consulting the backs of shampoo bottles, where we surprisingly found a plethora of puns and lighthearted quips. Despite their unconventional nature, these sources underscore the undeniable presence of humor in the most unexpected of places. In the spirit of good-natured inquiry, we embrace the whimsy that flavors our research, recognizing that even the most serious of endeavors benefits from the occasional splash of levity. After all, who says statistical analyses can't inspire a giggle or a groan every now and then?
[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of xkcd comics depicting political subject matter and the employment trends of animal control workers in New Jersey has yielded intriguing results. Over the 15-year period from 2007 to 2022, our research unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991 and an r-squared value of 0.5611494. In statistical terms, it turns out that the idiosyncratic musings of xkcd's political satire are not to be taken lightly, especially when it comes to the labor market of the Garden State. This unexpected relationship prompts the question: what do you get when you cross a political comic with a New Jersey animal control worker? A statistically significant correlation!
The significance level, with a p-value lower than 0.01, cements the statistical robustness of our findings, establishing a compelling case for the impact of internet humor on the workforce dedicated to the welfare of our furry friends. As we paws to contemplate the implications of these results, it's no stretch to say that the influence of xkcd's political comics on the employment dynamics of animal control workers in New Jersey is nothing to wag our tails at.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) reveals a visually striking relationship between the xkcd factor and the number of animal control workers, demonstrating an unmistakable trend that would make even the most ardent skeptic do a double take. Much like a well-crafted punchline, our findings deliver a surprise twist in the often somber and stoic world of empirical research. It's clear that within the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a touch of unexpected humor.
In summary, our research unearths a compelling nexus between the whimsical world of webcomics and the real-world impact on the labor force, serving as a refreshing reminder that data analysis, much like life, can benefit from a sprinkle of comedy. As we adjourn this lively excursion into the peculiar connections of statistical investigation and humor, let us remember the immortal words of scholarly wit: "The proof is in the pudding, but a good joke is the icing on the cake."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings not only add a touch of levity to the often serious realm of statistical analysis, but they also lend support to the previous research that hinted at the potential influence of web-based satire on societal structures. It seems that webcomics, particularly those of a politically themed nature, can indeed exert an unexpected influence on specific employment sectors. As we ponder the implications of our results, we should take a moment to appreciate the quirky interconnectedness of seemingly disparate elements in our modern world; after all, who would have guessed that the antics of stick-figure comics could be intertwined with the labor market trends of animal control workers in New Jersey? It appears that the impact is not only tangible but downright statistically significant. As our data paints a compelling picture of this unlikely relationship, we are reminded that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction. Speaking of truth, did you hear about the comedian who was boiling water for pasta? He forgot to season it with comedy, so it turned out pretty dry!
Smith and Doe's analysis, which considered the potential influence of webcomics on various aspects of modern society, seems to have been onto something. Our study supports the idea that politically themed webcomics may indeed have a noteworthy impact on labor dynamics, as evidenced by the correlation uncovered in our investigation. This unexpected correlation may leave some bewildered, but as the saying goes, truth can be stranger than fiction, especially when it comes with a generous sprinkling of humor. It begs the question: what do you get when you cross a politically themed webcomic with an employment sector in New Jersey? Apparently, a statistically noteworthy connection!
Jones et al.'s exploration into the quantitative analysis of internet humor and its societal ramifications provides further context for our findings. While their work does not directly address the labor market of animal control workers, it lays a foundation for understanding the potential impact of web-based satire on professional domains. Our investigation breezes through the convoluted maze of data, ferreting out patterns that can elicit a chuckle or two. It's clear that our statistically significant results go beyond mere coincidence; rather, they all point to a fascinating interplay between humor, data, and societal structures. Speaking of societal structures, did you hear about the collapse of the comedian's house of cards? It was a real stand-up disaster!
In conclusion, our investigation not only reinforces the potential impact of web-based satire on specific employment sectors but also serves as a lighthearted reminder that statistical analyses can offer unexpected twists and turns, much like a well-timed punchline in a comedy routine. As we navigate the intersection of humor and data, it becomes evident that statistical analysis, much like a good joke, has the power to surprise, entertain, and perhaps even prompt a thoughtful chuckle. So, in the spirit of scholarly inquiry and good-natured banter, we'll leave you with this thought: "Data analyses don't need to be dry—after all, a good joke can set them apart from the rest, adding a touch of humor to the numbers."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about politics and The number of animal control workers in New Jersey. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey"
[[ABSTRACT]]
Fellow academics and pun aficionados, get ready to be tickled as we delve into the improbable connection between xkcd comics about politics and the number of animal control workers in the quaint state of New Jersey. Employing a blend of humor, AI analysis, and statistical wizardry, our research team embarked on an empirical quest to investigate this peculiar nexus and unleash the unexpected correlations lurking in the realm of data.
In our analysis, which spans the years 2007 to 2022, we discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991, with a p-value less than 0.01, presenting a compelling case for the impact of xkcd political comics on the labor force of animal control in the Garden State. As the saying goes, every dog has its day, and our findings reveal an intriguing intertwining of political satire and the diligent individuals ensuring the harmony of human-animal coexistence.
As we navigate this curious conundrum, it's no coincidence that our endeavor unravels unexpected synergies and yields empirical evidence infused with some comedic relief. After all, who knew that the whimsical world of webcomics could have palpable implications for the workforce of our furry friends' custodians? This research delivers a blend of academic rigor and a whimsical spirit, presenting findings that are bound to provoke a chuckle or two in scholarly circles.
In conclusion, while our study may draw some raised eyebrows, it offers a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a playful twist. So, as we bid adieu to this remarkable journey, let us ponder the words of humorist Mark Twain: "The human race has only one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." And perhaps, the same goes for statistical analysis laced with a touch of whimsy.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Picture this: a world where political satire merges with the unassuming realm of animal control employment trends. Our research ventures into the uncharted territory of exploring the unexpected bond between xkcd comics and the number of animal control workers bustling in the charming abode of New Jersey.
It's no secret that humor and data analysis rarely collide, but in this instance, they undeniably do. Delving into the annals of numerical investigation, we found ourselves deep in the numbers, striving to uncover correlations that may seem as improbable as finding a cat who loves water. Speaking of improbable, why don't programmers like nature? It has too many bugs!
Our journey begins with a whimsical yet enigmatic pursuit, where the beloved webcomics of xkcd serve as the harbinger of potential influence on the labor force dedicated to the orderly cohabitation of humans and our furry companions. As we weave through the labyrinth of data points, there's a compelling urge to inject a dash of levity into our scholarly discourse. After all, what's the use of statistical analysis without a bit of statistical comedy? I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug.
As our study unfolds, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us on this delightful expedition, where we marinate our findings in a delightful blend of empirical rigor and a flavor of unexpected amusement. Akin to a captivating sitcom, our research refuses to abide by the norms of mundane scholarly investigation, infusing a touch of playfulness that's as refreshing as a well-timed knock-knock joke. Knock-knock. Who's there? Animal. Animal who? Animal control worker, answering your call of distress.
In the spirit of merriment and meticulous inquiry, we invite you to embark on this journey with us, as we untangle the web of correlations that bring together the world of webcomics and the diligent custodians of New Jersey's animal kingdom. So fasten your seatbelts, fellow researchers, for we assure you that this academic ride is sure to be a delightfully unexpected one. And remember, in the world of data exploration, even the most serious analyses can benefit from a touch of humor.
[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis of xkcd comics depicting political subject matter and the employment trends of animal control workers in New Jersey has yielded intriguing results. Over the 15-year period from 2007 to 2022, our research unveiled a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991 and an r-squared value of 0.5611494. In statistical terms, it turns out that the idiosyncratic musings of xkcd's political satire are not to be taken lightly, especially when it comes to the labor market of the Garden State. This unexpected relationship prompts the question: what do you get when you cross a political comic with a New Jersey animal control worker? A statistically significant correlation!
The significance level, with a p-value lower than 0.01, cements the statistical robustness of our findings, establishing a compelling case for the impact of internet humor on the workforce dedicated to the welfare of our furry friends. As we paws to contemplate the implications of these results, it's no stretch to say that the influence of xkcd's political comics on the employment dynamics of animal control workers in New Jersey is nothing to wag our tails at.
Furthermore, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) reveals a visually striking relationship between the xkcd factor and the number of animal control workers, demonstrating an unmistakable trend that would make even the most ardent skeptic do a double take. Much like a well-crafted punchline, our findings deliver a surprise twist in the often somber and stoic world of empirical research. It's clear that within the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a touch of unexpected humor.
In summary, our research unearths a compelling nexus between the whimsical world of webcomics and the real-world impact on the labor force, serving as a refreshing reminder that data analysis, much like life, can benefit from a sprinkle of comedy. As we adjourn this lively excursion into the peculiar connections of statistical investigation and humor, let us remember the immortal words of scholarly wit: "The proof is in the pudding, but a good joke is the icing on the cake."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In the whimsical world of statistical analysis, our research has shed light on a correlation as unexpected as a cat herding sheep—which incidentally, might be a lucrative business opportunity. Our investigation into the influence of xkcd political comics on the employment trends of animal control workers in New Jersey has not just uncovered a statistically significant relationship, but also results that are as surprising as finding a platypus in a petting zoo.
The palpable impact of internet humor on the labor force of our furry companions beckons the question: what do you call a correlation between a webcomic and animal control workers? A statistical paw-sibility! Our findings, packed with a robust p-value and a correlation coefficient that could make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile, affirm the gravity of this improbable connection.
In the spirit of academic rigor and a sprinkle of irreverence, we bid adieu to this peculiar exploration and assert, with absolute certainty, that no further research is needed in this area. Because in the realm of scholarly investigation, sometimes the most unlikely correlations lead to the most invaluable insights—and a fair share of dad jokes.
So, as we close this chapter of statistical hijinks, let us embrace the words of academia with a twist of humor: "When life gives you data, make statistical lemonade—with a dash of humor, of course."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Satirical Sociopolitical Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Theoretical Zoological Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey with an abstract of Fellow academics and pun aficionados, get ready to be tickled as we delve into the improbable connection between xkcd comics about politics and the number of animal control workers in the quaint state of New Jersey. Employing a blend of humor, AI analysis, and statistical wizardry, our research team embarked on an empirical quest to investigate this peculiar nexus and unleash the unexpected correlations lurking in the realm of data.
In our analysis, which spans the years 2007 to 2022, we discerned a correlation coefficient of 0.7490991, with a p-value less than 0.01, presenting a compelling case for the impact of xkcd political comics on the labor force of animal control in the Garden State. As the saying goes, every dog has its day, and our findings reveal an intriguing intertwining of political satire and the diligent individuals ensuring the harmony of human-animal coexistence.
As we navigate this curious conundrum, it's no coincidence that our endeavor unravels unexpected synergies and yields empirical evidence infused with some comedic relief. After all, who knew that the whimsical world of webcomics could have palpable implications for the workforce of our furry friends' custodians? This research delivers a blend of academic rigor and a whimsical spirit, presenting findings that are bound to provoke a chuckle or two in scholarly circles.
In conclusion, while our study may draw some raised eyebrows, it offers a lighthearted reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, there's always room for a playful twist. So, as we bid adieu to this remarkable journey, let us ponder the words of humorist Mark Twain: "The human race has only one really effective weapon, and that is laughter." And perhaps, the same goes for statistical analysis laced with a touch of whimsy.
ChatGPT:
xkcd comics, political comics, animal control employment trends, New Jersey, AI analysis, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, empirical evidence, webcomics, labor force, political satire, animal control workers, Garden State, data analysis, statistical wizardry
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
xkcd comics published about politicsDetailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about politics
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.
See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about politics
The number of animal control workers in New Jersey
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of animal control workers in New Jersey
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of animal control workers in New Jersey
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.5611494 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 56.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of animal control workers in New Jersey) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., xkcd comics published about politics) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00084. 0.0008384640983639266000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 0.084% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,193 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.4, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
xkcd comics published about politics (xkcd comics) | 5 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 9 | 0 |
The number of animal control workers in New Jersey (Animal Control Workers) | 260 | 300 | 350 | 370 | 330 | 360 | 340 | 380 | 290 | 300 | 300 | 330 | 420 | 440 | 350 | 240 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5,10,10,8,6,15,3,9,8,8,5,11,12,18,9,0,])
array_2 = np.array([260,300,350,370,330,360,340,380,290,300,300,330,420,440,350,240,])
array_1_name = "xkcd comics published about politics"
array_2_name = "The number of animal control workers in New Jersey"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only xkcd comics published about politics
- Line chart for only The number of animal control workers in New Jersey
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Xkcd Factor: Anecdotal Evidence of the Impact of Political Comics on Animal Control Employment Trends in New Jersey
Your rating is much appreciated!
Correlation ID: 1590 · Black Variable ID: 20019 · Red Variable ID: 11634