about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,621 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Mara and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Seeing a surge in popularity, more young Maras were hitting the road in their stylish cars. As they cruised around town, their magnetic charisma inadvertently caused the seat belts to malfunction, unable to contain the sheer force of their popularity. It became a widespread problem as car manufacturers scrambled to design Mara-proof seat belts, realizing that when it came to car safety, they couldn't buckle under the pressure of this trending name. Remember, with great Mara comes great responsibility – especially for the automotive industry!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a cybernetic art piece of a futuristic cityscape, illuminated by neon lights and holograms. In the center, a sleek car labeled "Mara" on the license plate is surrounded by a crowd of eager fans taking photos and asking for autographs. On the sidelines, a row of futuristic vehicles with glowing seatbelt indicators are being recalled, with mechanics in cybernetic suits inspecting and fixing the seat belts. The scene is filled with a sense of vibrant energy and advanced technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Concept art Cybernetic art Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, a car with the name "Mara" printed on the license plate is surrounded by a crowd of people eagerly taking photos and asking for autographs. Meanwhile, nearby, a group of cars with seatbelt issues are being recalled, with mechanics busy inspecting and fixing the seat belts.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, a car with the name "Mara" printed on the license plate is surrounded by a crowd of people eagerly taking photos and asking for autographs. Meanwhile, nearby, a group of cars with seatbelt issues are being recalled, with mechanics busy inspecting and fixing the seat belts. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a cybernetic art piece of a futuristic cityscape, illuminated by neon lights and holograms. In the center, a sleek car labeled "Mara" on the license plate is surrounded by a crowd of eager fans taking photos and asking for autographs. On the sidelines, a row of futuristic vehicles with glowing seatbelt indicators are being recalled, with mechanics in cybernetic suits inspecting and fixing the seat belts. The scene is filled with a sense of vibrant energy and advanced technology.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Mara caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry

The Journal of Transportation Safety and Risk Management

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The popularity of first names has long been associated with various social and cultural trends, but can it also influence consumer behavior and product safety in the automotive industry? Our research investigates the intriguing connection between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for issues specifically related to seat belts. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation covering the years 1975 to 2022, we employed statistical analysis to unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between the two variables. We delve into the unexpected and, at first glance, absurd association, shedding light on the unexplored dynamics between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. Through our findings, we challenge the conventional wisdom and invite the academic community to "buckle up" for a fresh perspective on the influence of names on product recalls and consumer behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The popularity of first names has long been associated with various social and cultural trends, but can it also influence consumer behavior and product safety in the automotive industry? Our research investigates the intriguing connection between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for issues specifically related to seat belts. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation covering the years 1975 to 2022, we employed statistical analysis to unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between the two variables. We delve into the unexpected and, at first glance, absurd association, shedding light on the unexplored dynamics between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. Through our findings, we challenge the conventional wisdom and invite the academic community to "buckle up" for a fresh perspective on the influence of names on product recalls and consumer behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the ever-evolving field of consumer behavior research, the influence of personal nomenclature on product safety and quality has been an area of relatively uncharted territory. However, our study seeks to challenge traditional assumptions and delve into the peculiar association between the popularity of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls related to seat belt issues. While it may seem far-fetched at first, the correlation we uncovered presents an intriguing and possibly even amusing insight into the dynamics of consumer behavior and automotive safety regulations.

The idea that a person's name could be predictive of their penchant for encountering seat belt-related recalls may initially provoke skepticism or perhaps even a chuckle. However, as researchers, we are dedicated to exploring unconventional patterns and patterns that hide in plain sight, concealed within the labyrinth of data. Our study seeks to shed light on this unexpected connection, disentangling the intricate web that links an individual's given name to a critical aspect of automotive safety.

As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is imperative to acknowledge the seemingly absurd nature of our inquiry. Nevertheless, the statistical evidence we have unearthed is no laughing matter. Upon rigorous analysis of extensive data sets, our findings have uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, thus underscoring the statistical significance of our discovered relationship. This suggests that the prevalence of the name "Mara" may indeed hold sway over the probability of encountering seat belt-related recalls within the automotive industry.

While we maintain the decorum and rigor expected of scholarly pursuits, we cannot help but appreciate the whimsical quirkiness that underlies this correlation. The very notion that the popularity of a name could affect an automotive component so fundamental is at once perplexing and intriguing. We invite the academic community to join us in unraveling this enigma, challenging preconceived notions, and embracing the unexpected in our ongoing exploration of the interplay between nomenclature, consumer behavior, and automotive safety regulations.

In the pages that follow, we present our methodology, detailed analyses, and the implications of our findings, leveraging a blend of academic rigor and a dash of lightheartedness. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed peers to approach this unconventional investigation with an open mind and a readiness to explore the unfathomable connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly ordinary phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The popularity of first names has long been associated with various social and cultural trends, but can it also influence consumer behavior and product safety in the automotive industry? Our research investigates the intriguing connection between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for issues specifically related to seat belts. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation covering the years 1975 to 2022, we employed statistical analysis to unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between the two variables. We delve into the unexpected and, at first glance, absurd association, shedding light on the unexplored dynamics between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. Through our findings, we challenge the conventional wisdom and invite the academic community to "buckle up" for a fresh perspective on the influence of names on product recalls and consumer behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving field of consumer behavior research, the influence of personal nomenclature on product safety and quality has been an area of relatively uncharted territory. However, our study seeks to challenge traditional assumptions and delve into the peculiar association between the popularity of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls related to seat belt issues. While it may seem far-fetched at first, the correlation we uncovered presents an intriguing and possibly even amusing insight into the dynamics of consumer behavior and automotive safety regulations.
The idea that a person's name could be predictive of their penchant for encountering seat belt-related recalls may initially provoke skepticism or perhaps even a chuckle. However, as researchers, we are dedicated to exploring unconventional patterns and patterns that hide in plain sight, concealed within the labyrinth of data. Our study seeks to shed light on this unexpected connection, disentangling the intricate web that links an individual's given name to a critical aspect of automotive safety.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is imperative to acknowledge the seemingly absurd nature of our inquiry. Nevertheless, the statistical evidence we have unearthed is no laughing matter. Upon rigorous analysis of extensive data sets, our findings have uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, thus underscoring the statistical significance of our discovered relationship. This suggests that the prevalence of the name "Mara" may indeed hold sway over the probability of encountering seat belt-related recalls within the automotive industry.
While we maintain the decorum and rigor expected of scholarly pursuits, we cannot help but appreciate the whimsical quirkiness that underlies this correlation. The very notion that the popularity of a name could affect an automotive component so fundamental is at once perplexing and intriguing. We invite the academic community to join us in unraveling this enigma, challenging preconceived notions, and embracing the unexpected in our ongoing exploration of the interplay between nomenclature, consumer behavior, and automotive safety regulations.
In the pages that follow, we present our methodology, detailed analyses, and the implications of our findings, leveraging a blend of academic rigor and a dash of lightheartedness. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed peers to approach this unconventional investigation with an open mind and a readiness to explore the unfathomable connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly ordinary phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between personal names and various societal phenomena has long captivated researchers, with scholars delving into the societal implications of nomenclature in diverse fields. Smith et al. (2010) in "Patterns in Naming" explored the connections between first names and social stereotypes, shedding light on the subtle yet profound associations tied to personal nomenclature. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) in "The Name Effect" delved into the psychological impact of names on individual behavior, unraveling the intricate interplay between names and self-perception.

Transitioning to the automotive industry, Pritchard (2017) in "Recall Realities" uncovered the nuanced factors contributing to product recalls within the automotive sector, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of safety regulations and consumer behavior in this domain. Concurrently, Tan (2019) in "Belted Insights" provided comprehensive insights into seat belt safety and the challenges faced by automakers in ensuring the reliability of seat belt mechanisms.

Venturing into a more literary lens, Orwell's "1984" and Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" offer fictional narratives that reflect dystopian societies with strict regulations, mirroring the rigidity of safety standards within the automotive industry, albeit in much more ominous contexts. Furthermore, the playful exploration of names in Nabokov's "Lolita" serves as a reminder of the often overlooked whimsicality that underlies nomenclature in influencing societal perceptions.

In the realm of internet culture, the "One Does Not Simply" meme from the "Lord of the Rings" film series humorously underscores the complexity of correlating names with unexpected outcomes, providing a light-hearted perspective on the intricate nature of such associations.

While the literature surrounding the topic may initially appear disparate, our study seeks to bridge the gap between these divergent realms, intertwining the serious and the whimsical in unraveling the connection between the popularity of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. As we embark on this scholarly exploration, we aim to infuse academic rigor with a sprinkling of levity, highlighting the unexpected and comedic dimensions of our research endeavor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1975 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The popularity of first names has long been associated with various social and cultural trends, but can it also influence consumer behavior and product safety in the automotive industry? Our research investigates the intriguing connection between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for issues specifically related to seat belts. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation covering the years 1975 to 2022, we employed statistical analysis to unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between the two variables. We delve into the unexpected and, at first glance, absurd association, shedding light on the unexplored dynamics between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. Through our findings, we challenge the conventional wisdom and invite the academic community to "buckle up" for a fresh perspective on the influence of names on product recalls and consumer behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving field of consumer behavior research, the influence of personal nomenclature on product safety and quality has been an area of relatively uncharted territory. However, our study seeks to challenge traditional assumptions and delve into the peculiar association between the popularity of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls related to seat belt issues. While it may seem far-fetched at first, the correlation we uncovered presents an intriguing and possibly even amusing insight into the dynamics of consumer behavior and automotive safety regulations.
The idea that a person's name could be predictive of their penchant for encountering seat belt-related recalls may initially provoke skepticism or perhaps even a chuckle. However, as researchers, we are dedicated to exploring unconventional patterns and patterns that hide in plain sight, concealed within the labyrinth of data. Our study seeks to shed light on this unexpected connection, disentangling the intricate web that links an individual's given name to a critical aspect of automotive safety.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is imperative to acknowledge the seemingly absurd nature of our inquiry. Nevertheless, the statistical evidence we have unearthed is no laughing matter. Upon rigorous analysis of extensive data sets, our findings have uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, thus underscoring the statistical significance of our discovered relationship. This suggests that the prevalence of the name "Mara" may indeed hold sway over the probability of encountering seat belt-related recalls within the automotive industry.
While we maintain the decorum and rigor expected of scholarly pursuits, we cannot help but appreciate the whimsical quirkiness that underlies this correlation. The very notion that the popularity of a name could affect an automotive component so fundamental is at once perplexing and intriguing. We invite the academic community to join us in unraveling this enigma, challenging preconceived notions, and embracing the unexpected in our ongoing exploration of the interplay between nomenclature, consumer behavior, and automotive safety regulations.
In the pages that follow, we present our methodology, detailed analyses, and the implications of our findings, leveraging a blend of academic rigor and a dash of lightheartedness. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed peers to approach this unconventional investigation with an open mind and a readiness to explore the unfathomable connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly ordinary phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To commence our investigative odyssey into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of the name "Mara" and automotive recalls concerning seat belt issues, we embarked on a quest for data spanning the years 1975 to 2022. Our research team navigated the virtual realm, collecting a treasure trove of data from the venerable repositories of the US Social Security Administration and the enigmatic sanctum of the US Department of Transportation. The expanse of our dataset encompassed the varying fortunes of the name "Mara" and the convoluted chronicles of automotive recalls, particularly those entwined with seat belt maladies.

To distill the essence of this multifaceted dataset, we performed a veritable alchemy of statistical analyses, invoking the time-honored incantations of correlation coefficients and p-values. The arcane art of statistical measurement unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476, signifying a robust relationship between the frequency of the name "Mara" and the proclivity for seat belt recall proneness. Furthermore, the p-value shimmered with statistical significance, dancing beneath the mystical threshold of 0.01. This esoteric incantation kindled the embers of curiosity, propelling us deeper into the labyrinthine chasm of our inquiry.

As our intellectual vessel navigated the uncharted waters of this research endeavor, we sought to illuminate the obscure nexus between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations through a series of rigorous analyses. Delving into the stratified layers of demographic and recall data, we employed a blend of descriptive statistics, regression models, and time series analyses to unveil the enigmatic tapestry intertwining the name "Mara" and automotive safety escapades.

Amidst the scholarly rigors of our pursuit, we maintained a vigilant eye for the serendipitous and the cryptic, acknowledging the whimsical nature of our inquiry. The ebullient humor inherent in the prospect of a correlation between a name and automotive safety did not evade our discerning scrutiny. Our journey through this eclectic terrain of academic exploration was punctuated by wry grins and quizzical furrowings of the brow, as we encountered the unexpected idiosyncrasies concealed within the annals of data.

In traversing through this methodological labyrinth, we unraveled the threads of association between the resonance of the name "Mara" and the auditory reverberations of automotive recall alarms, sparking both scholarly introspection and a sly smile at the whimsical nature of our quest. Through this methodological convergence of data diligence and spontaneous delight, we harnessed the quintessence of our inquiry to present a scholarly tableau of unanticipated correlations and the underlying charm of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and US DOT .

For the time period 1975 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7449476, r-squared of 0.5549470, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The popularity of first names has long been associated with various social and cultural trends, but can it also influence consumer behavior and product safety in the automotive industry? Our research investigates the intriguing connection between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for issues specifically related to seat belts. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation covering the years 1975 to 2022, we employed statistical analysis to unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between the two variables. We delve into the unexpected and, at first glance, absurd association, shedding light on the unexplored dynamics between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. Through our findings, we challenge the conventional wisdom and invite the academic community to "buckle up" for a fresh perspective on the influence of names on product recalls and consumer behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the ever-evolving field of consumer behavior research, the influence of personal nomenclature on product safety and quality has been an area of relatively uncharted territory. However, our study seeks to challenge traditional assumptions and delve into the peculiar association between the popularity of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls related to seat belt issues. While it may seem far-fetched at first, the correlation we uncovered presents an intriguing and possibly even amusing insight into the dynamics of consumer behavior and automotive safety regulations.
The idea that a person's name could be predictive of their penchant for encountering seat belt-related recalls may initially provoke skepticism or perhaps even a chuckle. However, as researchers, we are dedicated to exploring unconventional patterns and patterns that hide in plain sight, concealed within the labyrinth of data. Our study seeks to shed light on this unexpected connection, disentangling the intricate web that links an individual's given name to a critical aspect of automotive safety.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is imperative to acknowledge the seemingly absurd nature of our inquiry. Nevertheless, the statistical evidence we have unearthed is no laughing matter. Upon rigorous analysis of extensive data sets, our findings have uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, thus underscoring the statistical significance of our discovered relationship. This suggests that the prevalence of the name "Mara" may indeed hold sway over the probability of encountering seat belt-related recalls within the automotive industry.
While we maintain the decorum and rigor expected of scholarly pursuits, we cannot help but appreciate the whimsical quirkiness that underlies this correlation. The very notion that the popularity of a name could affect an automotive component so fundamental is at once perplexing and intriguing. We invite the academic community to join us in unraveling this enigma, challenging preconceived notions, and embracing the unexpected in our ongoing exploration of the interplay between nomenclature, consumer behavior, and automotive safety regulations.
In the pages that follow, we present our methodology, detailed analyses, and the implications of our findings, leveraging a blend of academic rigor and a dash of lightheartedness. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed peers to approach this unconventional investigation with an open mind and a readiness to explore the unfathomable connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly ordinary phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a substantial correlation between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls associated with seat belts, yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and an r-squared value of 0.5549470. The p-value falling below 0.01 signifies a strong statistical significance, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the striking pattern that emerged from our analysis, clearly demonstrating the positive correlation between the prevalence of the name "Mara" and the occurrence of seat belt-related automotive recalls. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the unexpected yet compelling association uncovered by our research.

The undeniable statistical evidence of this link challenges conventional wisdom and warrants a closer examination of the potential influence of personal nomenclature on product safety and consumer behavior. Our findings transcend mere numerical values, beckoning the academic community to contemplate the intriguing ramifications of this unanticipated correlation.

Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry, the statistical significance of our findings demands earnest consideration. While the connection between the name "Mara" and seat belt recalls may elicit initial skepticism or amusement, the empirical evidence we present invites a deeper reflection on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. It behooves us to approach this revelation with both analytical rigor and an appreciation for the unexpected, recognizing the multifaceted dimensions that underlie consumer behavior and product safety.

In subsequent sections of this paper, we will further expound upon the implications of our findings, delving into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation and its broader implications for consumer behavior research and automotive safety regulations.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The popularity of first names has long been associated with various social and cultural trends, but can it also influence consumer behavior and product safety in the automotive industry? Our research investigates the intriguing connection between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for issues specifically related to seat belts. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation covering the years 1975 to 2022, we employed statistical analysis to unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between the two variables. We delve into the unexpected and, at first glance, absurd association, shedding light on the unexplored dynamics between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. Through our findings, we challenge the conventional wisdom and invite the academic community to "buckle up" for a fresh perspective on the influence of names on product recalls and consumer behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between personal names and various societal phenomena has long captivated researchers, with scholars delving into the societal implications of nomenclature in diverse fields. Smith et al. (2010) in "Patterns in Naming" explored the connections between first names and social stereotypes, shedding light on the subtle yet profound associations tied to personal nomenclature. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) in "The Name Effect" delved into the psychological impact of names on individual behavior, unraveling the intricate interplay between names and self-perception.
Transitioning to the automotive industry, Pritchard (2017) in "Recall Realities" uncovered the nuanced factors contributing to product recalls within the automotive sector, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of safety regulations and consumer behavior in this domain. Concurrently, Tan (2019) in "Belted Insights" provided comprehensive insights into seat belt safety and the challenges faced by automakers in ensuring the reliability of seat belt mechanisms.
Venturing into a more literary lens, Orwell's "1984" and Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale" offer fictional narratives that reflect dystopian societies with strict regulations, mirroring the rigidity of safety standards within the automotive industry, albeit in much more ominous contexts. Furthermore, the playful exploration of names in Nabokov's "Lolita" serves as a reminder of the often overlooked whimsicality that underlies nomenclature in influencing societal perceptions.
In the realm of internet culture, the "One Does Not Simply" meme from the "Lord of the Rings" film series humorously underscores the complexity of correlating names with unexpected outcomes, providing a light-hearted perspective on the intricate nature of such associations.
While the literature surrounding the topic may initially appear disparate, our study seeks to bridge the gap between these divergent realms, intertwining the serious and the whimsical in unraveling the connection between the popularity of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for seat belt issues. As we embark on this scholarly exploration, we aim to infuse academic rigor with a sprinkling of levity, highlighting the unexpected and comedic dimensions of our research endeavor.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a substantial correlation between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls associated with seat belts, yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and an r-squared value of 0.5549470. The p-value falling below 0.01 signifies a strong statistical significance, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the striking pattern that emerged from our analysis, clearly demonstrating the positive correlation between the prevalence of the name "Mara" and the occurrence of seat belt-related automotive recalls. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the unexpected yet compelling association uncovered by our research.
The undeniable statistical evidence of this link challenges conventional wisdom and warrants a closer examination of the potential influence of personal nomenclature on product safety and consumer behavior. Our findings transcend mere numerical values, beckoning the academic community to contemplate the intriguing ramifications of this unanticipated correlation.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry, the statistical significance of our findings demands earnest consideration. While the connection between the name "Mara" and seat belt recalls may elicit initial skepticism or amusement, the empirical evidence we present invites a deeper reflection on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. It behooves us to approach this revelation with both analytical rigor and an appreciation for the unexpected, recognizing the multifaceted dimensions that underlie consumer behavior and product safety.
In subsequent sections of this paper, we will further expound upon the implications of our findings, delving into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation and its broader implications for consumer behavior research and automotive safety regulations.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study unequivocally support the unorthodox association between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for seat belt-related issues. While on the surface, this correlation may elicit amusement or incredulity, our statistical analysis buttresses the intriguing interrelationship between personal nomenclature and product safety in the automotive realm.

Building on the literature review, which playfully integrated diverse realms of scholarly inquiry and popular culture references, our findings underscore the multi-faceted impact of names on societal phenomena. The unexpected connection between the name "Mara" and seat belt recalls echoes the whimsical exploration of nomenclature in Nabokov's "Lolita," emphasizing the often underestimated influence of names on public perception.

Furthermore, our research lends empirical weight to the underlying themes in Orwell's "1984" and Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale," portraying the significance of rigidity in safety regulations, albeit in a less dystopian context. Just as these works caution against complacency in the face of seemingly absurd societal constructs, our study urges a reexamination of preconceived notions and an openness to unexpected correlations in consumer behavior and product safety.

In line with the serious yet jocular approach adopted in the literature review, our results shed light on the profound implications of seemingly frivolous correlations. This aligns with Doe and Jones' (2015) "The Name Effect," which delved into the psychological impact of names on individual behavior, suggesting that moniker-related influences extend to consumer choices and product safety measures in an automotive context.

Our study echoes the essence of the "One Does Not Simply" meme, humorously illustrating the intricacies of correlating names with unanticipated outcomes. The statistically significant relationship we unearthed between the name "Mara" and seat belt recalls serves as a testament to the profound yet often overlooked influence of nomenclature on societal patterns and behaviors.

In navigating the uncharted territory of name-related influences, our research embraces the academic rigor of Smith et al.'s (2010) "Patterns in Naming" and extends the scholarly discourse into unorthodox domains, fostering a dialogue on the unexpected dimensions of personal nomenclature. By bridging the serious and the whimsical, our study challenges traditional paradigms and encourages a reevaluation of the nuanced interplay between personal identity, consumer behavior, and product safety.

The recognized statistical significance of our findings compels a deeper examination of the hidden yet tangible influence of names on automotive safety regulations. Our research paves the way for a more holistic understanding of the dynamics pervading consumer behavior, beckoning scholars to approach this unanticipated correlation with both intellectual vigor and an appreciation for the unpredictability of societal phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Mara and Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The popularity of first names has long been associated with various social and cultural trends, but can it also influence consumer behavior and product safety in the automotive industry? Our research investigates the intriguing connection between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for issues specifically related to seat belts. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation covering the years 1975 to 2022, we employed statistical analysis to unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between the two variables. We delve into the unexpected and, at first glance, absurd association, shedding light on the unexplored dynamics between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. Through our findings, we challenge the conventional wisdom and invite the academic community to "buckle up" for a fresh perspective on the influence of names on product recalls and consumer behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the ever-evolving field of consumer behavior research, the influence of personal nomenclature on product safety and quality has been an area of relatively uncharted territory. However, our study seeks to challenge traditional assumptions and delve into the peculiar association between the popularity of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls related to seat belt issues. While it may seem far-fetched at first, the correlation we uncovered presents an intriguing and possibly even amusing insight into the dynamics of consumer behavior and automotive safety regulations.
The idea that a person's name could be predictive of their penchant for encountering seat belt-related recalls may initially provoke skepticism or perhaps even a chuckle. However, as researchers, we are dedicated to exploring unconventional patterns and patterns that hide in plain sight, concealed within the labyrinth of data. Our study seeks to shed light on this unexpected connection, disentangling the intricate web that links an individual's given name to a critical aspect of automotive safety.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is imperative to acknowledge the seemingly absurd nature of our inquiry. Nevertheless, the statistical evidence we have unearthed is no laughing matter. Upon rigorous analysis of extensive data sets, our findings have uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, thus underscoring the statistical significance of our discovered relationship. This suggests that the prevalence of the name "Mara" may indeed hold sway over the probability of encountering seat belt-related recalls within the automotive industry.
While we maintain the decorum and rigor expected of scholarly pursuits, we cannot help but appreciate the whimsical quirkiness that underlies this correlation. The very notion that the popularity of a name could affect an automotive component so fundamental is at once perplexing and intriguing. We invite the academic community to join us in unraveling this enigma, challenging preconceived notions, and embracing the unexpected in our ongoing exploration of the interplay between nomenclature, consumer behavior, and automotive safety regulations.
In the pages that follow, we present our methodology, detailed analyses, and the implications of our findings, leveraging a blend of academic rigor and a dash of lightheartedness. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we invite our esteemed peers to approach this unconventional investigation with an open mind and a readiness to explore the unfathomable connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly ordinary phenomena.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a substantial correlation between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls associated with seat belts, yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and an r-squared value of 0.5549470. The p-value falling below 0.01 signifies a strong statistical significance, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrates the striking pattern that emerged from our analysis, clearly demonstrating the positive correlation between the prevalence of the name "Mara" and the occurrence of seat belt-related automotive recalls. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the unexpected yet compelling association uncovered by our research.
The undeniable statistical evidence of this link challenges conventional wisdom and warrants a closer examination of the potential influence of personal nomenclature on product safety and consumer behavior. Our findings transcend mere numerical values, beckoning the academic community to contemplate the intriguing ramifications of this unanticipated correlation.
Despite the seemingly whimsical nature of our inquiry, the statistical significance of our findings demands earnest consideration. While the connection between the name "Mara" and seat belt recalls may elicit initial skepticism or amusement, the empirical evidence we present invites a deeper reflection on the intricate interplay between nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. It behooves us to approach this revelation with both analytical rigor and an appreciation for the unexpected, recognizing the multifaceted dimensions that underlie consumer behavior and product safety.
In subsequent sections of this paper, we will further expound upon the implications of our findings, delving into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation and its broader implications for consumer behavior research and automotive safety regulations.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light an intriguing relationship between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls linked to seat belt issues. The statistical analysis has uncovered a notable correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a significant association. The scatterplot vividly illustrates this unanticipated connection, adding a touch of whimsy to the otherwise sobering world of statistical analysis.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of mere numerical values, provoking contemplation on the enigmatic interplay between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. This peculiar association may raise eyebrows and elicit the occasional smirk, but it is a reminder of the unexpected twists and turns that underscore our pursuit of knowledge. It compels us to approach scholarly inquiry with both analytical rigor and a readiness to be amused by the delightful absurdity that occasionally graces the scientific landscape.

As we conclude this expedition into the fascinating correlation between name popularity and automotive recalls, we are left with a piquant appreciation for the idiosyncrasies that lie within the data. While our investigation may appear lighthearted on the surface, the statistical significance of our findings demands earnest consideration, prompting a reevaluation of the conventional boundaries that define consumer behavior research.

With that said, we assert, with tongue firmly in cheek, that further research in this area is probably unnecessary. After all, sometimes the most unexpected discoveries are the ones that need no further exploration. As we delight in the playful quirkiness of our findings, we bid adieu to this curious correlation, leaving it to merrily waltz through the annals of academia, a reminder that scholarly inquiry can, on occasion, be as amusing as it is enlightening.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transportation Safety and Risk Management


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Applied Transportation Safety Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Buckle Up: The Mara Effect on Seat Belt Recalls in the Automotive Industry with an abstract of The popularity of first names has long been associated with various social and cultural trends, but can it also influence consumer behavior and product safety in the automotive industry? Our research investigates the intriguing connection between the frequency of the first name "Mara" and automotive recalls for issues specifically related to seat belts. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the US Department of Transportation covering the years 1975 to 2022, we employed statistical analysis to unveil a correlation coefficient of 0.7449476 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between the two variables. We delve into the unexpected and, at first glance, absurd association, shedding light on the unexplored dynamics between personal nomenclature and automotive safety regulations. Through our findings, we challenge the conventional wisdom and invite the academic community to "buckle up" for a fresh perspective on the influence of names on product recalls and consumer behavior.

ChatGPT:

first name popularity, consumer behavior, automotive recalls, seat belt issues, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, US Social Security Administration, US Department of Transportation, automotive safety regulations, nomenclature influence, product recalls

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Mara
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Mara
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Mara

Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts

Correlation r = 0.7449476 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5549470 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Mara) over the 48 years from 1975 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-9. 0.0000000012663638196527769000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.74 in 1.3E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 789,662,484 random variables You don't actually need 789 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 47 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 47 because we have two variables measured over a period of 48 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.85 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Mara (Babies born)237286236273242260236244247230203204269331415443400371375370350393412411363418405420417427415415389355377308312335366409382427439430438463568476
Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts (Recalls)35413125848578925212521151511302424131042382419387111411415101024382726382421424631




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([237,286,236,273,242,260,236,244,247,230,203,204,269,331,415,443,400,371,375,370,350,393,412,411,363,418,405,420,417,427,415,415,389,355,377,308,312,335,366,409,382,427,439,430,438,463,568,476,])
array_2 = np.array([3,5,4,13,12,5,8,4,8,5,7,8,9,25,21,25,21,15,15,11,30,24,24,13,10,42,38,24,19,38,7,11,14,11,4,15,10,10,24,38,27,26,38,24,21,42,46,31,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Mara"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Seat Belts"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 1621 · Black Variable ID: 3058 · Red Variable ID: 1106
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0