about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,904 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina and the second variable is The number of bellhops in North Carolina.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2016, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air quality improved, the demand for smog-resistant bellhops decreased. The clean air meant there was no longer a need for "bell-hop and lock" protection services. With the fresh breeze blowing through, it seems the bellhops decided to "check out" of the hotel industry!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Inspired by bauhaus ] Generate an image of downtown Charlotte, North Carolina, engulfed in hazy pollution. Show a sleek, modernist hotel building standing prominently amidst the smog, with a few bellhops standing outside. The smog should visually convey the city's poor air quality, while the bellhops appear subtly affected by the environment, evoking a sense of atmosphere and modernist design. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Poor air quality in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic inspired by bauhaus Cute 2D animation Pop art Magic realism
ChatGPT: Inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Poor air quality in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Charlotte, North Carolina, the air quality is hazy and smoggy, with a thick layer of pollution hanging over the city. Amongst the pollution, a hotel in downtown Charlotte has a noticeably low number of bellhops standing outside, as if they are affected by the poor air quality just like everyone else in the city.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In Charlotte, North Carolina, the air quality is hazy and smoggy, with a thick layer of pollution hanging over the city. Amongst the pollution, a hotel in downtown Charlotte has a noticeably low number of bellhops standing outside, as if they are affected by the poor air quality just like everyone else in the city. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Inspired by bauhaus ] Generate an image of downtown Charlotte, North Carolina, engulfed in hazy pollution. Show a sleek, modernist hotel building standing prominently amidst the smog, with a few bellhops standing outside. The smog should visually convey the city's poor air quality, while the bellhops appear subtly affected by the environment, evoking a sense of atmosphere and modernist design.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina caused The number of bellhops in North Carolina to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer

Journal of Environmental Quirkiness

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2016.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover any potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. The findings suggest a bizarre, yet compelling connection that invites further investigation. While the relationship between air quality and bellhop employment may initially seem far-fetched, our research prompts a reconsideration of the unsuspected influence of air pollution on hotel staffing. In light of these unexpected results, it's time for environmental researchers to check into the impact of air quality on the hospitality industry, and perhaps time for bellhops to check out the potential health effects of their working environment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover any potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. The findings suggest a bizarre, yet compelling connection that invites further investigation. While the relationship between air quality and bellhop employment may initially seem far-fetched, our research prompts a reconsideration of the unsuspected influence of air pollution on hotel staffing. In light of these unexpected results, it's time for environmental researchers to check into the impact of air quality on the hospitality industry, and perhaps time for bellhops to check out the potential health effects of their working environment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that when one is in need of inquiry into the curious and the unusual, one must turn to the realm of academia. In this spirit of scholarly exploration, we present a study that delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Against the backdrop of mundane predictions and conventional wisdom, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly incongruous variables.

The title of our expedition, "Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer," captures the essence of our research journey. Our abstract wistfully teases the reader with the promise of a "bizarre, yet compelling connection" – a phrase carefully chosen to evoke both curiosity and skepticism, much like a magician's beguiling insistence that the rabbit will indeed come out of the hat.

Our investigation relied on data aggregated from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, lending a scientific air to our whimsical pursuit. This juxtaposition of the whimsical and the resolutely empirical encapsulates our approach – always grounded in rigorous methodology, but with a twinkle in our eyes and a latent penchant for the preposterous.

The logical foundations of our inquiry are anchored in the tenets of correlation and causation, familiar bedfellows to any researcher. Yet, the fertilization of our research germinated from the seed of absurdity, watered by the stream of curiosity, and bloomed into a daisy chain of unexpected discoveries. The fragrance of intrigue permeates the air, as we invite our esteemed readers to join us on this academic romp through an unlikely union of air quality and concierge service employment.

As we embark on this academic escapade, we encourage you, dear reader, to fasten your seatbelt (figuratively), for the journey ahead promises to be replete with unexpected twists and fortuitous discoveries. In the words of the great bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy," and we fully intend to be the intrepid explorers uncovering those very things.

So, with that peculiar fusion of academic sobriety and scholarly whimsy, we invite you to partake in the revelation of our findings – a tapestry woven with the threads of data, the warp of conjecture, and the weft of genuine surprise. It is our hope that this investigation will lay the groundwork for further exploration, perhaps revealing more curious connections lurking in the seemingly mundane tapestry of our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover any potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. The findings suggest a bizarre, yet compelling connection that invites further investigation. While the relationship between air quality and bellhop employment may initially seem far-fetched, our research prompts a reconsideration of the unsuspected influence of air pollution on hotel staffing. In light of these unexpected results, it's time for environmental researchers to check into the impact of air quality on the hospitality industry, and perhaps time for bellhops to check out the potential health effects of their working environment.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that when one is in need of inquiry into the curious and the unusual, one must turn to the realm of academia. In this spirit of scholarly exploration, we present a study that delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Against the backdrop of mundane predictions and conventional wisdom, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The title of our expedition, "Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer," captures the essence of our research journey. Our abstract wistfully teases the reader with the promise of a "bizarre, yet compelling connection" – a phrase carefully chosen to evoke both curiosity and skepticism, much like a magician's beguiling insistence that the rabbit will indeed come out of the hat.
Our investigation relied on data aggregated from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, lending a scientific air to our whimsical pursuit. This juxtaposition of the whimsical and the resolutely empirical encapsulates our approach – always grounded in rigorous methodology, but with a twinkle in our eyes and a latent penchant for the preposterous.
The logical foundations of our inquiry are anchored in the tenets of correlation and causation, familiar bedfellows to any researcher. Yet, the fertilization of our research germinated from the seed of absurdity, watered by the stream of curiosity, and bloomed into a daisy chain of unexpected discoveries. The fragrance of intrigue permeates the air, as we invite our esteemed readers to join us on this academic romp through an unlikely union of air quality and concierge service employment.
As we embark on this academic escapade, we encourage you, dear reader, to fasten your seatbelt (figuratively), for the journey ahead promises to be replete with unexpected twists and fortuitous discoveries. In the words of the great bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy," and we fully intend to be the intrepid explorers uncovering those very things.
So, with that peculiar fusion of academic sobriety and scholarly whimsy, we invite you to partake in the revelation of our findings – a tapestry woven with the threads of data, the warp of conjecture, and the weft of genuine surprise. It is our hope that this investigation will lay the groundwork for further exploration, perhaps revealing more curious connections lurking in the seemingly mundane tapestry of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between air pollution and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of academic curiosity. Smith et al. in "Air Quality and Its Implications" demonstrate the far-reaching impact of air pollution on various aspects of human life, from respiratory health to economic productivity. Similarly, Doe's study "The Invisible Hand: Air Pollution and Unintended Consequences" delves into the repercussions of air pollution on unexpected sectors of society, sparking contemplation of hidden connections waiting to be unearthed.

Jones' investigation "Pollution Puzzles: Unraveling the Environmental Riddles" brings to light the complex web of impacts air pollution can have on diverse industries, challenging traditional assumptions and paving the way for unconventional inquiries.

Turning to non-fiction resources on the topic, "The Air We Breathe: A Journey Through Pollution" by E. J. Smith offers a comprehensive exploration of the effects of air pollution on urban life, while "Every Breath You Take: A Citizen's Guide to Air Quality" by A. Doe provides accessible insights into the pervasive nature of air pollution and its myriad consequences. In the realm of fiction, "Clouded Skies: A Tale of Pollution and Perseverance" by R. Jones immerses readers in a world where air quality is a central theme, blending environmental awareness with storytelling prowess.

In the digital sphere, the infamous "This is Fine" meme has permeated popular culture, poignantly capturing the surreal experience of living in a world rife with air pollution and other environmental challenges. Furthermore, the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme offers a lighthearted take on the concept of shifting attention from one issue to another, mirroring the surprising shift in focus from air pollution to bellhop employment in our study.

As we plunge into the depths of this perplexing nexus between air pollution and bellhop numbers, we cannot ignore the rich tapestry of literary and digital influences that contribute to our understanding of these seemingly unrelated elements. The convergence of serious scholarship, imaginative fiction, and internet humor sets the stage for a multidimensional exploration of the unexpected relationship awaiting us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2007 to 2016

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover any potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. The findings suggest a bizarre, yet compelling connection that invites further investigation. While the relationship between air quality and bellhop employment may initially seem far-fetched, our research prompts a reconsideration of the unsuspected influence of air pollution on hotel staffing. In light of these unexpected results, it's time for environmental researchers to check into the impact of air quality on the hospitality industry, and perhaps time for bellhops to check out the potential health effects of their working environment.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that when one is in need of inquiry into the curious and the unusual, one must turn to the realm of academia. In this spirit of scholarly exploration, we present a study that delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Against the backdrop of mundane predictions and conventional wisdom, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The title of our expedition, "Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer," captures the essence of our research journey. Our abstract wistfully teases the reader with the promise of a "bizarre, yet compelling connection" – a phrase carefully chosen to evoke both curiosity and skepticism, much like a magician's beguiling insistence that the rabbit will indeed come out of the hat.
Our investigation relied on data aggregated from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, lending a scientific air to our whimsical pursuit. This juxtaposition of the whimsical and the resolutely empirical encapsulates our approach – always grounded in rigorous methodology, but with a twinkle in our eyes and a latent penchant for the preposterous.
The logical foundations of our inquiry are anchored in the tenets of correlation and causation, familiar bedfellows to any researcher. Yet, the fertilization of our research germinated from the seed of absurdity, watered by the stream of curiosity, and bloomed into a daisy chain of unexpected discoveries. The fragrance of intrigue permeates the air, as we invite our esteemed readers to join us on this academic romp through an unlikely union of air quality and concierge service employment.
As we embark on this academic escapade, we encourage you, dear reader, to fasten your seatbelt (figuratively), for the journey ahead promises to be replete with unexpected twists and fortuitous discoveries. In the words of the great bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy," and we fully intend to be the intrepid explorers uncovering those very things.
So, with that peculiar fusion of academic sobriety and scholarly whimsy, we invite you to partake in the revelation of our findings – a tapestry woven with the threads of data, the warp of conjecture, and the weft of genuine surprise. It is our hope that this investigation will lay the groundwork for further exploration, perhaps revealing more curious connections lurking in the seemingly mundane tapestry of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our academic pilgrimage into the world of unlikely associations, we first required a systematic approach to gather and scrutinize the necessary data. Our research team did not resort to arcane rituals or prophetic visions to procure the data; rather, we scoured the vast expanses of the internet, much like intrepid explorers seeking the elusive treasure trove of information. The prime resources we consulted were the Environmental Protection Agency's Air Quality System Database and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. These founts of information provided the bedrock for our analysis, allowing us to navigate the labyrinth of air pollution and bellhop employment data with scholarly zeal.

The intrepid journey through this sea of data extended from the year 2007 to 2016, encompassing a decade of tumultuous societal change and climactic adaptation. Our quest was to capture the zeitgeist of the times and distill it into numerical form, creating an alchemical elixir of empirical evidence that would shed light on the curious relationship between air quality and the hospitality profession. We meticulously documented air quality indices, pollutant concentrations, and belabored over bellhop employment statistics with the fervor of dedicated scholars and the eye for detail characteristic of astute adventurers preparing for their next great expedition.

With our quivers full of sanitized data, our next step entailed performing a series of statistical rites and incantations. We subjected the data to the rigorous scrutiny of descriptive statistics, charting the highs and lows of air pollution levels and bellhop employment across the temporal landscape. Our scribes tirelessly calculated means, medians, and standard deviations, akin to diligent alchemists observing the fluctuations of their concoctions under the watchful gaze of their patronizing university.

The marriage of our data to parametric and non-parametric tests ensued, simulating an intellectual waltz with correlation coefficients and p-values as our dancing partners. With ardor and determination, we sought esoterically significant relationships between air quality and bellhop employment, casting aside the veil of mundanity to peer into the mystical realm of improbable connections.

So, even as we trudged through the quagmire of data analysis, our spirits remained buoyed by the promise of uncovering the enigmatic nexus between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in our dear Tar Heel State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2007 to 2016, you found a correlation 0.8822225, r-squared of 0.7783166, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover any potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. The findings suggest a bizarre, yet compelling connection that invites further investigation. While the relationship between air quality and bellhop employment may initially seem far-fetched, our research prompts a reconsideration of the unsuspected influence of air pollution on hotel staffing. In light of these unexpected results, it's time for environmental researchers to check into the impact of air quality on the hospitality industry, and perhaps time for bellhops to check out the potential health effects of their working environment.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that when one is in need of inquiry into the curious and the unusual, one must turn to the realm of academia. In this spirit of scholarly exploration, we present a study that delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Against the backdrop of mundane predictions and conventional wisdom, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The title of our expedition, "Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer," captures the essence of our research journey. Our abstract wistfully teases the reader with the promise of a "bizarre, yet compelling connection" – a phrase carefully chosen to evoke both curiosity and skepticism, much like a magician's beguiling insistence that the rabbit will indeed come out of the hat.
Our investigation relied on data aggregated from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, lending a scientific air to our whimsical pursuit. This juxtaposition of the whimsical and the resolutely empirical encapsulates our approach – always grounded in rigorous methodology, but with a twinkle in our eyes and a latent penchant for the preposterous.
The logical foundations of our inquiry are anchored in the tenets of correlation and causation, familiar bedfellows to any researcher. Yet, the fertilization of our research germinated from the seed of absurdity, watered by the stream of curiosity, and bloomed into a daisy chain of unexpected discoveries. The fragrance of intrigue permeates the air, as we invite our esteemed readers to join us on this academic romp through an unlikely union of air quality and concierge service employment.
As we embark on this academic escapade, we encourage you, dear reader, to fasten your seatbelt (figuratively), for the journey ahead promises to be replete with unexpected twists and fortuitous discoveries. In the words of the great bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy," and we fully intend to be the intrepid explorers uncovering those very things.
So, with that peculiar fusion of academic sobriety and scholarly whimsy, we invite you to partake in the revelation of our findings – a tapestry woven with the threads of data, the warp of conjecture, and the weft of genuine surprise. It is our hope that this investigation will lay the groundwork for further exploration, perhaps revealing more curious connections lurking in the seemingly mundane tapestry of our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our intrepid exploration into the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state has yielded intriguing results. After diligently sifting through data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2007 to 2016, our analysis unveiled a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8822225, indicative of a strong positive relationship between the two variables.

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 showcases this robust correlation, with the points forming a delightful pattern reminiscent of a bellhop ringing the doorbell of causation. The y-axis reflects the number of bellhops employed, while the x-axis captures the air quality index, offering a visual feast for the eyes of data enthusiasts and perhaps a puzzle for the minds of bellhops themselves. And yes, we do realize that it might make you want to "bell-hop" around in excitement!

The r-squared value of 0.7783166 further emphasizes the noteworthy degree to which changes in air pollution can be associated with changes in the number of bellhops employed. It's a bit like seeing the correlation between socks and the likelihood of a sock puppet show – delightfully unexpected yet undeniably linked in a manner that calls for thoughtful consideration.

Notably, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It's as if the universe itself conspired to nudge us in the direction of this curious association, beckoning us to peer through the looking glass of statistical significance into the wonderland of unexpected relationships.

In light of these findings, it appears that the influence of air pollution extends beyond respiratory health and environmental impact, venturing into the realm of hotel staffing. Perhaps it's time for bellhops to double down on ensuring guest satisfaction, as they might unknowingly be serving as a barometer for the air quality of a region – who knew their responsibilities would extend beyond just carrying luggage!

The data paint a compelling picture of a tangible linkage between air pollution levels and the demand for bellhop services, urging us to ponder the profound implications of this unanticipated relationship. These findings beckon us to consider the peculiar interplay between environmental factors and the service industry, prompting an intriguing reevaluation of the subtle effects of air quality on hospitality employment.

For those accustomed to exploring the cloistered corridors of conventional research, this unexpected finding echoes a sentiment from the great poet Robert Frost: "Two roads diverged in a wood, and I – I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." And indeed, we have taken the road less traveled, leading us to uncover a correlation that challenges traditional scholarly expectations and beckons for further investigation.

These results inspire us to acknowledge the unanticipated symbiosis of air pollution and the hospitality industry, reminding us that in the vast tapestry of correlations, there are threads of connection waiting to be unraveled and appreciated. Just like the unexpected joy of finding money in the pocket of your winter coat, these findings invite us to embrace the delightful surprises woven into the fabric of empirical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover any potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. The findings suggest a bizarre, yet compelling connection that invites further investigation. While the relationship between air quality and bellhop employment may initially seem far-fetched, our research prompts a reconsideration of the unsuspected influence of air pollution on hotel staffing. In light of these unexpected results, it's time for environmental researchers to check into the impact of air quality on the hospitality industry, and perhaps time for bellhops to check out the potential health effects of their working environment.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between air pollution and seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a subject of academic curiosity. Smith et al. in "Air Quality and Its Implications" demonstrate the far-reaching impact of air pollution on various aspects of human life, from respiratory health to economic productivity. Similarly, Doe's study "The Invisible Hand: Air Pollution and Unintended Consequences" delves into the repercussions of air pollution on unexpected sectors of society, sparking contemplation of hidden connections waiting to be unearthed.
Jones' investigation "Pollution Puzzles: Unraveling the Environmental Riddles" brings to light the complex web of impacts air pollution can have on diverse industries, challenging traditional assumptions and paving the way for unconventional inquiries.
Turning to non-fiction resources on the topic, "The Air We Breathe: A Journey Through Pollution" by E. J. Smith offers a comprehensive exploration of the effects of air pollution on urban life, while "Every Breath You Take: A Citizen's Guide to Air Quality" by A. Doe provides accessible insights into the pervasive nature of air pollution and its myriad consequences. In the realm of fiction, "Clouded Skies: A Tale of Pollution and Perseverance" by R. Jones immerses readers in a world where air quality is a central theme, blending environmental awareness with storytelling prowess.
In the digital sphere, the infamous "This is Fine" meme has permeated popular culture, poignantly capturing the surreal experience of living in a world rife with air pollution and other environmental challenges. Furthermore, the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme offers a lighthearted take on the concept of shifting attention from one issue to another, mirroring the surprising shift in focus from air pollution to bellhop employment in our study.
As we plunge into the depths of this perplexing nexus between air pollution and bellhop numbers, we cannot ignore the rich tapestry of literary and digital influences that contribute to our understanding of these seemingly unrelated elements. The convergence of serious scholarship, imaginative fiction, and internet humor sets the stage for a multidimensional exploration of the unexpected relationship awaiting us.

[[RESULTS]]
Our intrepid exploration into the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state has yielded intriguing results. After diligently sifting through data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2007 to 2016, our analysis unveiled a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8822225, indicative of a strong positive relationship between the two variables.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 showcases this robust correlation, with the points forming a delightful pattern reminiscent of a bellhop ringing the doorbell of causation. The y-axis reflects the number of bellhops employed, while the x-axis captures the air quality index, offering a visual feast for the eyes of data enthusiasts and perhaps a puzzle for the minds of bellhops themselves. And yes, we do realize that it might make you want to "bell-hop" around in excitement!
The r-squared value of 0.7783166 further emphasizes the noteworthy degree to which changes in air pollution can be associated with changes in the number of bellhops employed. It's a bit like seeing the correlation between socks and the likelihood of a sock puppet show – delightfully unexpected yet undeniably linked in a manner that calls for thoughtful consideration.
Notably, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It's as if the universe itself conspired to nudge us in the direction of this curious association, beckoning us to peer through the looking glass of statistical significance into the wonderland of unexpected relationships.
In light of these findings, it appears that the influence of air pollution extends beyond respiratory health and environmental impact, venturing into the realm of hotel staffing. Perhaps it's time for bellhops to double down on ensuring guest satisfaction, as they might unknowingly be serving as a barometer for the air quality of a region – who knew their responsibilities would extend beyond just carrying luggage!
The data paint a compelling picture of a tangible linkage between air pollution levels and the demand for bellhop services, urging us to ponder the profound implications of this unanticipated relationship. These findings beckon us to consider the peculiar interplay between environmental factors and the service industry, prompting an intriguing reevaluation of the subtle effects of air quality on hospitality employment.
For those accustomed to exploring the cloistered corridors of conventional research, this unexpected finding echoes a sentiment from the great poet Robert Frost: "Two roads diverged in a wood, and I – I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." And indeed, we have taken the road less traveled, leading us to uncover a correlation that challenges traditional scholarly expectations and beckons for further investigation.
These results inspire us to acknowledge the unanticipated symbiosis of air pollution and the hospitality industry, reminding us that in the vast tapestry of correlations, there are threads of connection waiting to be unraveled and appreciated. Just like the unexpected joy of finding money in the pocket of your winter coat, these findings invite us to embrace the delightful surprises woven into the fabric of empirical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our exploration of the previously uncharted territory of air pollution and bellhop employment in North Carolina has unearthed some fascinating findings, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that has eluded academic inquiry until now. The wide-eyed wonder of our results resembles that of a traveler stumbling upon a hidden gem in the labyrinthine streets of a foreign city.

Upon revisiting the literature review, we were struck by the subtle yet profound connections between seemingly disparate entities, such as air pollution and unconventional influences. Just as the "This is Fine" meme captivates audiences with its humorous yet poignant portrayal of environmental challenges, our study has transcended the norm by revealing the unanticipated impact of air pollution on the service industry. The digital realm's influence on our understanding of unexpected correlations has proven to be more than mere amusement; it has served as a beacon guiding our exploration of the intricate web of interconnections waiting to be unraveled.

Our results stand as a testament to the prior research that has ventured into the realm of surprising associations and inconspicuous influence. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value fortify the foundation laid by previous scholarly works, affirming the presence of a tangible linkage between air pollution levels and the demand for bellhop services. It's as if the threads of connection woven by earlier studies have drawn us to the intricate tapestry of empirical investigation, unveiling an unexpected panorama of interwoven elements awaiting scholarly scrutiny.

The unexpected robustness of the correlation coefficient and statistical significance call to mind the serendipitous joy of finding a $20 bill in a pair of forgotten jeans – a delightful surprise that defies conventional expectations. The results not only echo the sentiments of our predecessors but also pave the way for further exploration of the unforeseen interplay between environmental factors and the hospitality industry.

The figurative delight of the scatterplot in Fig. 1 dances with the whimsy of a surrealist painting, revealing a pattern that beckons us to ponder the enigmatic relationship between air quality and hotel staffing. The visual metaphor of a bellhop ringing the doorbell of causation encapsulates the compelling nature of this unexpected connection, urging us to reconsider the unsuspected extent of air pollution's influence on the flourishing of hotel services.

In essence, our results serve as a gentle reminder that in the staid realm of empirical inquiry, there are curious connections waiting to be illuminated, much like hidden Easter eggs in a well-worn video game. They beckon us to embrace the unexpected beauty of intricate correlations and inspire further scholarly investigation into the uncharted terrain of curious connections – after all, in the landscape of research, there's always a room for surprise!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina and The number of bellhops in North Carolina. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover any potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. The findings suggest a bizarre, yet compelling connection that invites further investigation. While the relationship between air quality and bellhop employment may initially seem far-fetched, our research prompts a reconsideration of the unsuspected influence of air pollution on hotel staffing. In light of these unexpected results, it's time for environmental researchers to check into the impact of air quality on the hospitality industry, and perhaps time for bellhops to check out the potential health effects of their working environment.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that when one is in need of inquiry into the curious and the unusual, one must turn to the realm of academia. In this spirit of scholarly exploration, we present a study that delves into the peculiar relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Against the backdrop of mundane predictions and conventional wisdom, we embarked on a quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between these seemingly incongruous variables.
The title of our expedition, "Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer," captures the essence of our research journey. Our abstract wistfully teases the reader with the promise of a "bizarre, yet compelling connection" – a phrase carefully chosen to evoke both curiosity and skepticism, much like a magician's beguiling insistence that the rabbit will indeed come out of the hat.
Our investigation relied on data aggregated from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, lending a scientific air to our whimsical pursuit. This juxtaposition of the whimsical and the resolutely empirical encapsulates our approach – always grounded in rigorous methodology, but with a twinkle in our eyes and a latent penchant for the preposterous.
The logical foundations of our inquiry are anchored in the tenets of correlation and causation, familiar bedfellows to any researcher. Yet, the fertilization of our research germinated from the seed of absurdity, watered by the stream of curiosity, and bloomed into a daisy chain of unexpected discoveries. The fragrance of intrigue permeates the air, as we invite our esteemed readers to join us on this academic romp through an unlikely union of air quality and concierge service employment.
As we embark on this academic escapade, we encourage you, dear reader, to fasten your seatbelt (figuratively), for the journey ahead promises to be replete with unexpected twists and fortuitous discoveries. In the words of the great bard, "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy," and we fully intend to be the intrepid explorers uncovering those very things.
So, with that peculiar fusion of academic sobriety and scholarly whimsy, we invite you to partake in the revelation of our findings – a tapestry woven with the threads of data, the warp of conjecture, and the weft of genuine surprise. It is our hope that this investigation will lay the groundwork for further exploration, perhaps revealing more curious connections lurking in the seemingly mundane tapestry of our world.

[[RESULTS]]
Our intrepid exploration into the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state has yielded intriguing results. After diligently sifting through data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the years 2007 to 2016, our analysis unveiled a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8822225, indicative of a strong positive relationship between the two variables.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 showcases this robust correlation, with the points forming a delightful pattern reminiscent of a bellhop ringing the doorbell of causation. The y-axis reflects the number of bellhops employed, while the x-axis captures the air quality index, offering a visual feast for the eyes of data enthusiasts and perhaps a puzzle for the minds of bellhops themselves. And yes, we do realize that it might make you want to "bell-hop" around in excitement!
The r-squared value of 0.7783166 further emphasizes the noteworthy degree to which changes in air pollution can be associated with changes in the number of bellhops employed. It's a bit like seeing the correlation between socks and the likelihood of a sock puppet show – delightfully unexpected yet undeniably linked in a manner that calls for thoughtful consideration.
Notably, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. It's as if the universe itself conspired to nudge us in the direction of this curious association, beckoning us to peer through the looking glass of statistical significance into the wonderland of unexpected relationships.
In light of these findings, it appears that the influence of air pollution extends beyond respiratory health and environmental impact, venturing into the realm of hotel staffing. Perhaps it's time for bellhops to double down on ensuring guest satisfaction, as they might unknowingly be serving as a barometer for the air quality of a region – who knew their responsibilities would extend beyond just carrying luggage!
The data paint a compelling picture of a tangible linkage between air pollution levels and the demand for bellhop services, urging us to ponder the profound implications of this unanticipated relationship. These findings beckon us to consider the peculiar interplay between environmental factors and the service industry, prompting an intriguing reevaluation of the subtle effects of air quality on hospitality employment.
For those accustomed to exploring the cloistered corridors of conventional research, this unexpected finding echoes a sentiment from the great poet Robert Frost: "Two roads diverged in a wood, and I – I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference." And indeed, we have taken the road less traveled, leading us to uncover a correlation that challenges traditional scholarly expectations and beckons for further investigation.
These results inspire us to acknowledge the unanticipated symbiosis of air pollution and the hospitality industry, reminding us that in the vast tapestry of correlations, there are threads of connection waiting to be unraveled and appreciated. Just like the unexpected joy of finding money in the pocket of your winter coat, these findings invite us to embrace the delightful surprises woven into the fabric of empirical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we draw the curtains on our whimsical odyssey through the curious crossroads of air pollution and bellhop employment in Charlotte, North Carolina, the tapestry of our findings unfurls with a delightful surprise. Our data paints a vivid portrait of the strong positive correlation between air pollution levels and the number of bellhops employed, capturing the essence of a connection both bizarre and compelling.

The robust correlation coefficient, akin to a well-tuned concierge bell, rings with the unmistakable resonance of an unexpected melody. Our statistical analysis, adorned with a shimmering p-value of less than 0.01, acts as a spotlight illuminating the stage upon which this peculiar relationship unfolds.

In the grand ballroom of empirical inquiry, this revelation pirouettes gracefully, challenging the prevailing notions of proximity and causation. It beckons us to consider the interplay of environmental factors and the service industry, inviting us to marvel at the unexplored corridors of unexpected connections, much like stumbling upon a hidden chamber in a grand hotel.

As our investigation veers into whimsy and wonder, our findings nudge the academic community to reconsider the unsuspected influence of air pollution on the opus of hotel staffing. The sweet symphony of this correlation raises myriad questions, inviting researchers to explore the multifaceted implications of this unanticipated linkage – a task that promises to unravel additional layers to this melodic mystery.

As we bid adieu to this curious intersection of air quality and concierge employment, we assert that the findings of this study surpass the wildest dreams of a hall of mirrors, capturing the enigmatic dance of seemingly disparate variables in an unexpected waltz of scholarly surprise.

In the grand tradition of vaudevillian performers bidding the audience "no more rabbits in the hat," we declare that no additional research is needed in this area, for the stage of inquiry is set, the spotlight is beaming, and the peculiar partnership between air pollution and bellhop employment has danced its way into the limelight of empirical wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Quirkiness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Progressive Atmospheric Solutions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Checking In on Air Pollution: A Bellhop Barometer with an abstract of This study explores the relationship between air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina, and the number of bellhops in the state. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we sought to uncover any potential link between these seemingly disparate factors. Our analysis reveals a strong correlation coefficient of 0.8822225 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2007 to 2016. The findings suggest a bizarre, yet compelling connection that invites further investigation. While the relationship between air quality and bellhop employment may initially seem far-fetched, our research prompts a reconsideration of the unsuspected influence of air pollution on hotel staffing. In light of these unexpected results, it's time for environmental researchers to check into the impact of air quality on the hospitality industry, and perhaps time for bellhops to check out the potential health effects of their working environment.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, bellhops, air quality, environmental impact, hospitality industry, Charlotte, North Carolina, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, health effects of air pollution, hotel staffing

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina

The number of bellhops in North Carolina
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of baggage porters and bellhops in North Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of bellhops in North Carolina

Correlation r = 0.8822225 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7783166 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of bellhops in North Carolina) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina) over the 10 years from 2007 through 2016.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00073. 0.0007285960288215143000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 0.073% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,373 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016
Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina (Bad air quality days)5.753422.1857901.095892.191781.09290000.546448
The number of bellhops in North Carolina (Laborers)1630750680490530470490520530550




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.75342,2.18579,0,1.09589,2.19178,1.0929,0,0,0,0.546448,])
array_2 = np.array([1630,750,680,490,530,470,490,520,530,550,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Charlotte, North Carolina"
array_2_name = "The number of bellhops in North Carolina"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1904 · Black Variable ID: 20444 · Red Variable ID: 17737
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0