about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,909 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Liana and the second variable is The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the name Liana gained popularity, more parents were inspired by the idea of their children pursuing careers in the medical field. This led to a sudden surge in young phlebotomists-in-training in West Virginia, all eager to *draw* attention to their skills. It seems like the name Liana didn't just have a nice ring to it, but also a strong *bloodline* connection to the healthcare industry in the mountain state!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Cute 2D animation] Create a heartwarming image of Liana, a cheerful phlebotomist, in a bustling West Virginia hospital. Depict her surrounded by a diverse group of patients, each wearing a friendly and appreciative expression. Liana exudes efficiency and compassion as she expertly draws blood, her warmth and skill evident in every interaction. Show the long line of patients, with each individual showcasing the growing popularity and importance of phlebotomists in the state. Capture the joyful atmosphere and the meaningful connections being formed amid the hospital's busy environment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic a Polaroid photo Cute 2D animation An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Macabre
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling hospital in West Virginia, a cheerful phlebotomist named Liana is surrounded by a group of patients, all appreciating her friendly and efficient approach. As she expertly draws blood, her popularity is evident as she interacts with a long line of patients, showcasing the growing number of phlebotomists in the state.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling hospital in West Virginia, a cheerful phlebotomist named Liana is surrounded by a group of patients, all appreciating her friendly and efficient approach. As she expertly draws blood, her popularity is evident as she interacts with a long line of patients, showcasing the growing number of phlebotomists in the state. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Cute 2D animation] Create a heartwarming image of Liana, a cheerful phlebotomist, in a bustling West Virginia hospital. Depict her surrounded by a diverse group of patients, each wearing a friendly and appreciative expression. Liana exudes efficiency and compassion as she expertly draws blood, her warmth and skill evident in every interaction. Show the long line of patients, with each individual showcasing the growing popularity and importance of phlebotomists in the state. Capture the joyful atmosphere and the meaningful connections being formed amid the hospital's busy environment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Liana caused The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists

The Journal of Lighthearted Botanical Anecdotes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a whimsical inquiry into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a pun-tastic journey to unveil whether there exists a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the seemingly bizarre nature of the investigation, our findings revealed a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022.

A dad joke to lighten the mood (and perhaps add some insight): What do you call a phlebotomist with a sense of humor? A comedi-ciserum!

Our quasi-serious yet light-hearted study sheds a humorous light on the potentially influential role of naming trends on occupational pathways. It is our hope that this offbeat investigation will add a dash of whimsy to the academic discourse and inspire further investigations into seemingly improbable correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a whimsical inquiry into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a pun-tastic journey to unveil whether there exists a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the seemingly bizarre nature of the investigation, our findings revealed a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022.

A dad joke to lighten the mood (and perhaps add some insight): What do you call a phlebotomist with a sense of humor? A comedi-ciserum!

Our quasi-serious yet light-hearted study sheds a humorous light on the potentially influential role of naming trends on occupational pathways. It is our hope that this offbeat investigation will add a dash of whimsy to the academic discourse and inspire further investigations into seemingly improbable correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the wacky world of research, it takes a certain kind of quirky curiosity to explore the unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated variables. Our journey through this hilariously harebrained investigation led us to delve into the mystifying mystery of whether there is a meaningful relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in the fine state of West Virginia. With data in hand and puns at the ready, we dared to peek behind the curtain of statistics to uncover potential correlations that might just make you say "vein-tastic!"

Speaking of veins, have you heard about the phlebotomy humor craze? It's blood-y hilarious!

Inspired by a desire to infuse some levity into the world of academia, we ventured forth armed with the laughter-inducing datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our hope? To inject some lightheartedness into the often serious domain of statistical analysis while unraveling the enigmatic ties between a name like Liana and the noble profession of phlebotomists. With a pinch of puns and a dash of data, we set out to demonstrate that even whimsical study topics can lead to intriguing and statistically significant findings.

Before we plunge into the depths of our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humor in statistics. It's the only field where mean people never smile, mode-est assumptions are made, and outliers are always causing treble!

As we tickled our funny bones with the analysis, our robust statistical methods and rigorous approach revealed a surprising coefficient of 0.9373231 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022. This significant connection between the name Liana and the phlebotomist workforce in West Virginia left us grinning from ear to ear, marveling at the puzzling power of seemingly unrelated variables to dance the statistical tango.

Now, let's draw the curtain and step onto the stage of unconventional correlations. The spotlight is on the intriguing interplay between the choice of a name and the career pathways it might unknowingly influence. Let's unleash some statistical shenanigans and sprinkle a healthy dose of whimsical insight on this jocular journey through the Liana-Phlebotomist nexus.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a whimsical inquiry into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a pun-tastic journey to unveil whether there exists a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the seemingly bizarre nature of the investigation, our findings revealed a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022.

A dad joke to lighten the mood (and perhaps add some insight): What do you call a phlebotomist with a sense of humor? A comedi-ciserum!

Our quasi-serious yet light-hearted study sheds a humorous light on the potentially influential role of naming trends on occupational pathways. It is our hope that this offbeat investigation will add a dash of whimsy to the academic discourse and inspire further investigations into seemingly improbable correlations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, it takes a certain kind of quirky curiosity to explore the unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated variables. Our journey through this hilariously harebrained investigation led us to delve into the mystifying mystery of whether there is a meaningful relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in the fine state of West Virginia. With data in hand and puns at the ready, we dared to peek behind the curtain of statistics to uncover potential correlations that might just make you say "vein-tastic!"
Speaking of veins, have you heard about the phlebotomy humor craze? It's blood-y hilarious!
Inspired by a desire to infuse some levity into the world of academia, we ventured forth armed with the laughter-inducing datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our hope? To inject some lightheartedness into the often serious domain of statistical analysis while unraveling the enigmatic ties between a name like Liana and the noble profession of phlebotomists. With a pinch of puns and a dash of data, we set out to demonstrate that even whimsical study topics can lead to intriguing and statistically significant findings.
Before we plunge into the depths of our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humor in statistics. It's the only field where mean people never smile, mode-est assumptions are made, and outliers are always causing treble!
As we tickled our funny bones with the analysis, our robust statistical methods and rigorous approach revealed a surprising coefficient of 0.9373231 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022. This significant connection between the name Liana and the phlebotomist workforce in West Virginia left us grinning from ear to ear, marveling at the puzzling power of seemingly unrelated variables to dance the statistical tango.
Now, let's draw the curtain and step onto the stage of unconventional correlations. The spotlight is on the intriguing interplay between the choice of a name and the career pathways it might unknowingly influence. Let's unleash some statistical shenanigans and sprinkle a healthy dose of whimsical insight on this jocular journey through the Liana-Phlebotomist nexus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a source of fascination for researchers. In "Smith et al.'s study, the authors find a significant relationship between socioeconomic status and healthcare career choices, shedding light on the intricate web of societal influence on occupational paths." Adding a splash of whimsy to this discussion, our study sets out to uncover the potential impact of a name as delightful as Liana on the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia.

In "Doe's analysis," the authors reveal the intriguing link between naming trends and cultural shifts, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the subtle ways in which names may shape individual trajectories. This notion leads us to ponder: Could the rise of the name Liana have inadvertently contributed to the burgeoning phlebotomist population in the mountain state of West Virginia? The implications are enough to make one's veins tingle with curiosity.

Venturing into the delightful realm of non-fiction books, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner springs to mind. While not directly related to our investigation, the book's exploration of unexpected correlations and unconventional insights serves as a fitting homage to our whimsical pursuit. On a slightly tangential note, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell prompts us to consider the tipping point at which naming trends might tip the scales in favor of particular career paths, perhaps nudging aspiring individuals towards the noble pursuit of phlebotomy.

Now, it's time to take a playful leap into the realm of fiction. Consider "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, a captivating tale that beckons readers to contemplate the power embedded within names. In a similar vein, the whimsically titled "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett reminds us of the unpredictable forces at play in the world, much like the intriguing connection we seek to explore between the name Liana and the phlebotomy profession in West Virginia.

In the cinematic realm, "The Social Network" offers a refreshing lens through which to view the influence of societal dynamics on individual pursuits, sparking thoughts on the subtle yet impactful threads that weave through the fabric of our choices. As an entertaining detour, "Patch Adams" draws attention to the compassionate side of healthcare, reminding us that laughter and lightheartedness can coexist with the noble pursuit of healing.

In the spirit of merging academic inquiry with humor, we invite readers to journey with us through the whimsical landscape of correlations and connections, all while savoring the occasional dad joke to brighten the journey. Just remember, when it comes to uncovering statistical surprises, it's all fun and games until someone loses a p-value!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a whimsical inquiry into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a pun-tastic journey to unveil whether there exists a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the seemingly bizarre nature of the investigation, our findings revealed a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022.

A dad joke to lighten the mood (and perhaps add some insight): What do you call a phlebotomist with a sense of humor? A comedi-ciserum!

Our quasi-serious yet light-hearted study sheds a humorous light on the potentially influential role of naming trends on occupational pathways. It is our hope that this offbeat investigation will add a dash of whimsy to the academic discourse and inspire further investigations into seemingly improbable correlations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, it takes a certain kind of quirky curiosity to explore the unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated variables. Our journey through this hilariously harebrained investigation led us to delve into the mystifying mystery of whether there is a meaningful relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in the fine state of West Virginia. With data in hand and puns at the ready, we dared to peek behind the curtain of statistics to uncover potential correlations that might just make you say "vein-tastic!"
Speaking of veins, have you heard about the phlebotomy humor craze? It's blood-y hilarious!
Inspired by a desire to infuse some levity into the world of academia, we ventured forth armed with the laughter-inducing datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our hope? To inject some lightheartedness into the often serious domain of statistical analysis while unraveling the enigmatic ties between a name like Liana and the noble profession of phlebotomists. With a pinch of puns and a dash of data, we set out to demonstrate that even whimsical study topics can lead to intriguing and statistically significant findings.
Before we plunge into the depths of our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humor in statistics. It's the only field where mean people never smile, mode-est assumptions are made, and outliers are always causing treble!
As we tickled our funny bones with the analysis, our robust statistical methods and rigorous approach revealed a surprising coefficient of 0.9373231 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022. This significant connection between the name Liana and the phlebotomist workforce in West Virginia left us grinning from ear to ear, marveling at the puzzling power of seemingly unrelated variables to dance the statistical tango.
Now, let's draw the curtain and step onto the stage of unconventional correlations. The spotlight is on the intriguing interplay between the choice of a name and the career pathways it might unknowingly influence. Let's unleash some statistical shenanigans and sprinkle a healthy dose of whimsical insight on this jocular journey through the Liana-Phlebotomist nexus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this delightfully quirky research endeavor, we employed a mirthful mix of data gathering techniques alongside statistical analyses that were as precise as a well-aimed dad joke. Our methodology aimed to gallivant through the data, unearthing correlations with the finesse of a comedic timing.

To commence this revelrous romp, we first sourced data on the popularity of the name Liana from the illustrious US Social Security Administration. Channeling our inner code-cracking jesters, we hilariously navigated through the labyrinthine database to glean the yearly counts of newborns christened with this melodious moniker from 2012 to 2022.

A little research humor for the road: Did you hear about the statistician who took comedy classes? He found out that timing really is everything in a punchline and a p-value!

Next, we embarked on our whimsical quest to pinpoint the number of phlebotomists in the esteemed land of West Virginia, drawing upon the zany data trove of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. With guffaws and gusto, we sifted through the numbers to capture the annual headcounts of these fine folk who deftly draw blood with the precision of a comedian delivering a punchline.

Our methodological madness escalated as we juggled and juxtaposed the datasets, wielding statistical software with the aplomb of a seasoned jester to calculate the correlation coefficient and determine the p-value for the Liana-phlebotomist nexus. The rigorous statistical tests were as rigorous as a setup to a killer punchline, leaving no stone unturned in our whimsical pursuit of uncovering potential connections between this seemingly improbable duo.

With a twinkle in our eyes and a penchant for the peculiar, we delved into the statistical cavalcade armed with a dose of good humor and a penchant for eccentric correlations. Our hope? To sprinkle the world of quantitative research with a touch of whimsy and uncover unforeseen links that elicit a chuckle and a raised eyebrow in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9373231, r-squared of 0.8785746, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a whimsical inquiry into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a pun-tastic journey to unveil whether there exists a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the seemingly bizarre nature of the investigation, our findings revealed a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022.

A dad joke to lighten the mood (and perhaps add some insight): What do you call a phlebotomist with a sense of humor? A comedi-ciserum!

Our quasi-serious yet light-hearted study sheds a humorous light on the potentially influential role of naming trends on occupational pathways. It is our hope that this offbeat investigation will add a dash of whimsy to the academic discourse and inspire further investigations into seemingly improbable correlations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the wacky world of research, it takes a certain kind of quirky curiosity to explore the unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated variables. Our journey through this hilariously harebrained investigation led us to delve into the mystifying mystery of whether there is a meaningful relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in the fine state of West Virginia. With data in hand and puns at the ready, we dared to peek behind the curtain of statistics to uncover potential correlations that might just make you say "vein-tastic!"
Speaking of veins, have you heard about the phlebotomy humor craze? It's blood-y hilarious!
Inspired by a desire to infuse some levity into the world of academia, we ventured forth armed with the laughter-inducing datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our hope? To inject some lightheartedness into the often serious domain of statistical analysis while unraveling the enigmatic ties between a name like Liana and the noble profession of phlebotomists. With a pinch of puns and a dash of data, we set out to demonstrate that even whimsical study topics can lead to intriguing and statistically significant findings.
Before we plunge into the depths of our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humor in statistics. It's the only field where mean people never smile, mode-est assumptions are made, and outliers are always causing treble!
As we tickled our funny bones with the analysis, our robust statistical methods and rigorous approach revealed a surprising coefficient of 0.9373231 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022. This significant connection between the name Liana and the phlebotomist workforce in West Virginia left us grinning from ear to ear, marveling at the puzzling power of seemingly unrelated variables to dance the statistical tango.
Now, let's draw the curtain and step onto the stage of unconventional correlations. The spotlight is on the intriguing interplay between the choice of a name and the career pathways it might unknowingly influence. Let's unleash some statistical shenanigans and sprinkle a healthy dose of whimsical insight on this jocular journey through the Liana-Phlebotomist nexus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our delightfully droll investigation revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Our analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9373231, suggesting a remarkably strong positive relationship between these variables. With an r-squared value of 0.8785746, our findings indicated that a jaw-dropping 87.86% of the variation in the number of phlebotomists can be explained by the popularity of the name Liana. It's as if the name Liana has been drawing phlebotomists like a magnet – or should we say, like a "blood magnet"?

In the whimsically crafted scatterplot (Fig. 1), the exuberantly high correlation between the number of phlebotomists and the popularity of the name Liana is graphically depicted. It's as clear as day, just like a well-drawn vein, that the two variables are in cahoots, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "blood relatives."

Our analysis also revealed a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables by mere chance is as rare as finding a phlebotomist who's afraid of needles – virtually nonexistent!

This irrational relationship between the popularity of a name and the number of individuals practicing phlebotomy in West Virginia tickled our statistical fancy and left us marveling at the unexpected connections that statistics can unveil. It appears that the impact of a name can extend beyond mere social recognition and into the captivating world of occupational choices.

As we wrap up our risible adventure through this improbable correlation, it's clear that the name Liana carries a mysterious statistical allure that reaches even into the domain of healthcare occupations. This beguiling relationship between a name and an occupation leaves us with a wealth of questions and a newfound appreciation for the quirky and capricious nature of statistical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a whimsical inquiry into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a pun-tastic journey to unveil whether there exists a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the seemingly bizarre nature of the investigation, our findings revealed a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022.

A dad joke to lighten the mood (and perhaps add some insight): What do you call a phlebotomist with a sense of humor? A comedi-ciserum!

Our quasi-serious yet light-hearted study sheds a humorous light on the potentially influential role of naming trends on occupational pathways. It is our hope that this offbeat investigation will add a dash of whimsy to the academic discourse and inspire further investigations into seemingly improbable correlations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long been a source of fascination for researchers. In "Smith et al.'s study, the authors find a significant relationship between socioeconomic status and healthcare career choices, shedding light on the intricate web of societal influence on occupational paths." Adding a splash of whimsy to this discussion, our study sets out to uncover the potential impact of a name as delightful as Liana on the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia.
In "Doe's analysis," the authors reveal the intriguing link between naming trends and cultural shifts, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the subtle ways in which names may shape individual trajectories. This notion leads us to ponder: Could the rise of the name Liana have inadvertently contributed to the burgeoning phlebotomist population in the mountain state of West Virginia? The implications are enough to make one's veins tingle with curiosity.
Venturing into the delightful realm of non-fiction books, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner springs to mind. While not directly related to our investigation, the book's exploration of unexpected correlations and unconventional insights serves as a fitting homage to our whimsical pursuit. On a slightly tangential note, "The Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell prompts us to consider the tipping point at which naming trends might tip the scales in favor of particular career paths, perhaps nudging aspiring individuals towards the noble pursuit of phlebotomy.
Now, it's time to take a playful leap into the realm of fiction. Consider "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss, a captivating tale that beckons readers to contemplate the power embedded within names. In a similar vein, the whimsically titled "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett reminds us of the unpredictable forces at play in the world, much like the intriguing connection we seek to explore between the name Liana and the phlebotomy profession in West Virginia.
In the cinematic realm, "The Social Network" offers a refreshing lens through which to view the influence of societal dynamics on individual pursuits, sparking thoughts on the subtle yet impactful threads that weave through the fabric of our choices. As an entertaining detour, "Patch Adams" draws attention to the compassionate side of healthcare, reminding us that laughter and lightheartedness can coexist with the noble pursuit of healing.
In the spirit of merging academic inquiry with humor, we invite readers to journey with us through the whimsical landscape of correlations and connections, all while savoring the occasional dad joke to brighten the journey. Just remember, when it comes to uncovering statistical surprises, it's all fun and games until someone loses a p-value!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our delightfully droll investigation revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Our analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9373231, suggesting a remarkably strong positive relationship between these variables. With an r-squared value of 0.8785746, our findings indicated that a jaw-dropping 87.86% of the variation in the number of phlebotomists can be explained by the popularity of the name Liana. It's as if the name Liana has been drawing phlebotomists like a magnet – or should we say, like a "blood magnet"?
In the whimsically crafted scatterplot (Fig. 1), the exuberantly high correlation between the number of phlebotomists and the popularity of the name Liana is graphically depicted. It's as clear as day, just like a well-drawn vein, that the two variables are in cahoots, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "blood relatives."
Our analysis also revealed a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables by mere chance is as rare as finding a phlebotomist who's afraid of needles – virtually nonexistent!
This irrational relationship between the popularity of a name and the number of individuals practicing phlebotomy in West Virginia tickled our statistical fancy and left us marveling at the unexpected connections that statistics can unveil. It appears that the impact of a name can extend beyond mere social recognition and into the captivating world of occupational choices.
As we wrap up our risible adventure through this improbable correlation, it's clear that the name Liana carries a mysterious statistical allure that reaches even into the domain of healthcare occupations. This beguiling relationship between a name and an occupation leaves us with a wealth of questions and a newfound appreciation for the quirky and capricious nature of statistical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our delightfully droll investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia has yielded intriguing findings that not only support, but also amplify the existing literature on the influence of seemingly unrelated factors on occupational trends. As we anticipated, our results align with Smith et al.'s study, which highlighted the profound impact of societal factors on healthcare career choices. In a lighthearted twist, our research has demonstrated that the name Liana appears to wield a remarkably strong influence, akin to a magnetic force, on the presence of phlebotomists in the mountainous terrain of West Virginia.

Returning to the whimsical musings in the literature review, our investigation has shed light on the whimsically named "Tipping Point" by Malcolm Gladwell, illustrating that the name Liana may indeed tip the scales in favor of a career in phlebotomy for the good people of West Virginia. Though a light-hearted notion, the correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 has provided a statistically robust back-up to this fanciful idea, revealing that Liana's popularity is linked to a significant portion of the variation in the number of phlebotomists.

Our results also lend scientific credence to the light-hearted jesting about "Patch Adams," as our findings suggest that lightheartedness and a penchant for mirth may indeed harmoniously coexist with the noble pursuit of drawing blood. It appears that the influence of a name can extend beyond mere nomenclature and into the captivating and often capricious world of occupational choices.

Our whimsical yet rigorous inquiry has illuminated a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between the popularity of the name Liana and the number of practiced phlebotomists in West Virginia by mere chance is as rare as encountering a timid phlebotomist – highly improbable. This uncanny relationship between a name and an occupation has not only tickled our statistical fancy, but has also prompted a reevaluation of the often whimsical and unpredictable nature of statistical inquiry.

Moreover, this quirkily unprecedented investigation has laid the foundation for further explorations into the potential impact of nomenclature on career paths, revelling in the joy and surprise that the intersection of statistics and curious correlations can bring. As we conclude this discussion, let us remember that in the marvelously peculiar realm of statistical inquiry, it's amazing what turns up when you apply an analytical eye to the most unexpected of relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Liana and The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a whimsical inquiry into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a pun-tastic journey to unveil whether there exists a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the seemingly bizarre nature of the investigation, our findings revealed a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022.

A dad joke to lighten the mood (and perhaps add some insight): What do you call a phlebotomist with a sense of humor? A comedi-ciserum!

Our quasi-serious yet light-hearted study sheds a humorous light on the potentially influential role of naming trends on occupational pathways. It is our hope that this offbeat investigation will add a dash of whimsy to the academic discourse and inspire further investigations into seemingly improbable correlations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, it takes a certain kind of quirky curiosity to explore the unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated variables. Our journey through this hilariously harebrained investigation led us to delve into the mystifying mystery of whether there is a meaningful relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in the fine state of West Virginia. With data in hand and puns at the ready, we dared to peek behind the curtain of statistics to uncover potential correlations that might just make you say "vein-tastic!"
Speaking of veins, have you heard about the phlebotomy humor craze? It's blood-y hilarious!
Inspired by a desire to infuse some levity into the world of academia, we ventured forth armed with the laughter-inducing datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our hope? To inject some lightheartedness into the often serious domain of statistical analysis while unraveling the enigmatic ties between a name like Liana and the noble profession of phlebotomists. With a pinch of puns and a dash of data, we set out to demonstrate that even whimsical study topics can lead to intriguing and statistically significant findings.
Before we plunge into the depths of our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humor in statistics. It's the only field where mean people never smile, mode-est assumptions are made, and outliers are always causing treble!
As we tickled our funny bones with the analysis, our robust statistical methods and rigorous approach revealed a surprising coefficient of 0.9373231 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022. This significant connection between the name Liana and the phlebotomist workforce in West Virginia left us grinning from ear to ear, marveling at the puzzling power of seemingly unrelated variables to dance the statistical tango.
Now, let's draw the curtain and step onto the stage of unconventional correlations. The spotlight is on the intriguing interplay between the choice of a name and the career pathways it might unknowingly influence. Let's unleash some statistical shenanigans and sprinkle a healthy dose of whimsical insight on this jocular journey through the Liana-Phlebotomist nexus.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our delightfully droll investigation revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Our analysis unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9373231, suggesting a remarkably strong positive relationship between these variables. With an r-squared value of 0.8785746, our findings indicated that a jaw-dropping 87.86% of the variation in the number of phlebotomists can be explained by the popularity of the name Liana. It's as if the name Liana has been drawing phlebotomists like a magnet – or should we say, like a "blood magnet"?
In the whimsically crafted scatterplot (Fig. 1), the exuberantly high correlation between the number of phlebotomists and the popularity of the name Liana is graphically depicted. It's as clear as day, just like a well-drawn vein, that the two variables are in cahoots, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "blood relatives."
Our analysis also revealed a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables by mere chance is as rare as finding a phlebotomist who's afraid of needles – virtually nonexistent!
This irrational relationship between the popularity of a name and the number of individuals practicing phlebotomy in West Virginia tickled our statistical fancy and left us marveling at the unexpected connections that statistics can unveil. It appears that the impact of a name can extend beyond mere social recognition and into the captivating world of occupational choices.
As we wrap up our risible adventure through this improbable correlation, it's clear that the name Liana carries a mysterious statistical allure that reaches even into the domain of healthcare occupations. This beguiling relationship between a name and an occupation leaves us with a wealth of questions and a newfound appreciation for the quirky and capricious nature of statistical inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we bring this whimsical wander through Liana's legacy and the phlebotomist phenomenon to a close, we find ourselves marveling at the unexpectedly robust connection between these seemingly disparate variables. Like a cleverly extracted blood sample, our findings have revealed a statistically significant correlation that can only be described as vein-tastic! The name Liana appears to wield a mysterious influence that extends beyond the realm of nomenclature, drawing individuals into the noble art of phlebotomy with an allure as mesmerizing as a captivating pun.

With our quirky investigation, we have certainly unearthed a tale that may lead one to ponder, "What's in a name?" It seems that in the case of Liana, there's a statistical force at play that beckons aspiring phlebotomists as reliably as a magnet attracts iron filings. It's as if there's some sort of statistical serum coursing through the occupational pathways of West Virginia – a phenomenon that is as wondrous as it is humorous.

In the spirit of statistical merriment, we are reminded of the ever-quotable words of Galileo: "Measure what is measurable, and make measurable what is not so." In our statistical escapade, we've managed to measure the immeasurable and uncover a correlation that adds a delightful twist to the narrative of occupational predilections.

In closing, it seems that the whimsical melody of statistical correlations has brought us to an unexpected crescendo, where the name Liana and the phlebotomist workforce dance to a statistical rhythm that defies conventional expectations. Our research may just be the needle in the haystack that provokes a chuckle and prompts further investigation into the enchanting influence of names on occupational choices.

In the words of our concluding dad joke: Why did the statistician break up with the phlebotomist? He couldn't handle her constantly drawing conclusions!

As the curtain falls on this offbeat yet enlightening exploration, we assert with confidence that no further research is needed to establish the captivating connection between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. It's a statistical marvel that stands as a testament to the charmingly capricious nature of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Lighthearted Botanical Anecdotes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Nonsensical Botanical Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Liana Legacy: Lighthearted Look at Liana's Impact on Phlebotomists with an abstract of In this study, we undertook a whimsical inquiry into the relationship between the popularity of the first name Liana and the number of phlebotomists in West Virginia. Harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a pun-tastic journey to unveil whether there exists a statistically significant connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Despite the seemingly bizarre nature of the investigation, our findings revealed a whopping correlation coefficient of 0.9373231 and p < 0.01 for the years 2012 to 2022.
A dad joke to lighten the mood (and perhaps add some insight): What do you call a phlebotomist with a sense of humor? A comedi-ciserum!
Our quasi-serious yet light-hearted study sheds a humorous light on the potentially influential role of naming trends on occupational pathways. It is our hope that this offbeat investigation will add a dash of whimsy to the academic discourse and inspire further investigations into seemingly improbable correlations.

ChatGPT:

Liana popularity, phlebotomist, first name correlation, West Virginia, US Social Security Administration data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, naming trends, occupational pathways, whimsical inquiry, statistically significant connection

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Liana
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Liana
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Liana

The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of phlebotomists in West Virginia
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia

Correlation r = 0.9373231 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8785746 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Liana) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.07E-5. 0.0000206518978388648460000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.00207% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 48,422 random variables You don't actually need 48 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Liana (Babies born)545514522597684628646670668773696
The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia (Phlebotomists)80085081010701110100010901080110012801060




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([545,514,522,597,684,628,646,670,668,773,696,])
array_2 = np.array([800,850,810,1070,1110,1000,1090,1080,1100,1280,1060,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Liana"
array_2_name = "The number of phlebotomists in West Virginia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 1909 · Black Variable ID: 3628 · Red Variable ID: 19600
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0